Listening Test: Matching Questions (IELTS Academic: Listening): Study Material

Fabio Cerpelloni

Written by: Fabio Cerpelloni

Reviewed by: Emily M

Updated on

Matching questions in the listening test

  • In the Listening test, matching questions ask you to connect information you hear in the recording to a list of options on the question paper

  • You need to listen for the link between the numbered items  and the options

  • The questions (the numbered items) follow the order of information in the recording 

  • The options may not follow the order of information in the recording 

  • Each option can be used once or more than once

Examples of matching questions

Worked Example

Example 1 — Listening Part 3: Research Methods Matching

Questions 21–25

What research method is each study primarily associated with?

Match each study to a letter from A to H.

List of Research Methods

A

longitudinal tracking

B

naturalistic observation

C

neuroimaging

D

structured interviews

E

randomised controlled trial

F

experience sampling

G

cross-cultural comparison

H

meta-analysis

  1. The Whitehall II study

  2. The Marshmallow experiment

  3. The Hofstede cultural dimensions project

  4. The Edinburgh sleep and mood study

  5. The Cochrane review of CBT for anxiety

Example 1 — Listening Part 3: Research Methods Matching
00:00
/
00:00

Answer key:

Question

Study

Letter

Method

21

Whitehall II

A

longitudinal tracking

22

Marshmallow experiment

B

naturalistic observation

23

Hofstede cultural dimensions

G

cross-cultural comparison

24

Edinburgh sleep and mood

F

experience sampling

25

Cochrane review of CBT

H

meta-analysis

Explaining the distractors:

  • Whitehall II (A): Russell wrongly suggests structured interviews — Megan corrects to longitudinal tracking. Classic wrong-guess-corrected pattern

  • Marshmallow experiment (B): Russell assumes it's a controlled trial because of the lab setting — Megan clarifies the observation-based methodology. Tests whether candidates follow the reasoning or latch onto surface cues

  • Hofstede (G): Russell again suggests structured interviews (the survey instrument) — Megan redirects to the comparative framework. Same distractor (D) used twice across different questions, which is permitted in the matching format

  • Edinburgh (F): Russell confuses it with longitudinal tracking — Megan distinguishes experience sampling by granularity and real-time focus. Tests the A vs F distinction

  • Cochrane (H): Confirmed without misdirection, but the conversation explicitly mentions that the underlying studies are RCTs — weaker candidates may select E instead of H

  • Neuroimaging (C) and RCT (E): Both explicitly mentioned at the end as methods that don't apply to these five studies, preventing candidates from assigning leftover letters by elimination

  • Neuroimaging (C), structured interviews (D) and randomised controlled trial (E) are unused options

Worked Example

Example 2 — Listening Part 2: Leisure Facility Criticism Matching

Questions 11–16

Which main criticism does the speaker identify for each leisure facility?

Choose A, B or C. You may select any letter more than once.

CRITICISMS

A

limited parking / poor access by car

B

high membership or entry fees

C

restricted opening hours

Questions 11–16:

Match the facility to the correct criticism:

  1. Riverside Sports Centre

  2. The Hillside Gym

  3. Parkfield Leisure Complex

  4. Northgate Swimming Pool

  5. The Brampton Centre

  6. Cedar Road Sports Hall

Example 2 — Listening Part 2: Leisure Facility Criticism Matching
00:00
/
00:00

Answer Key & Analysis

Q

Facility

Key

Distractor Logic

11

Riverside

A

Fees reasonable (rules out B); open until 9pm (rules out C)

12

Hillside Gym

C

Large car park (rules out A); standard fees fine (rules out B)

13

Parkfield

B

Bus route/plentiful parking (rules out A); 6am-10pm (rules out C)

14

Northgate

B

Access manageable (rules out A); open until 9pm (rules out C)

15

Brampton

C

Free car park (rules out A); competitive fees (rules out B)

16

Cedar Road

A

Subsidised/accessible (rules out B); open late/weekends (rules out C)

Explaining the distractors:

  • Rule-out Patterns: The script systematically addresses the two non-critique categories (e.g., pricing and hours) before confirming the actual problem (e.g., parking). This requires candidates to follow the complete reasoning rather than selecting the first mentioned category

  • Lexical Paraphrasing: "Limited parking" is discussed via "permit zones" and "tiny lots," while "restricted opening hours" is linked to "closing early" and being "limiting for workers."

How to answer matching questions 

  • Read the instructions and both lists carefully 

  • Make sure you understand how the task works

  • When you scan both lists, highlight important keywords and think about what you might hear

  • Take a moment to think about synonyms for these keywords 

    • For example, if the text says “rural area,” you should anticipate hearing words like “countryside,” “remote location” or “agricultural region"”

  • Remember that the recording will rarely use the exact vocabulary found in the question paper

  • Be careful: the speaker might mention multiple options in a single turn, or use words that appear in the options as distractors to mislead you

  • Wait until the speaker has finished discussing that specific point before making your decision

  • Write the letter answer, not the word or phrase from the box

Sign up now for IELTS Academic

or
Fabio Cerpelloni

Author: Fabio Cerpelloni

Expertise: English Language Teaching Specialist

Fabio Cerpelloni is a learner of English turned English language teaching specialist, content writer, and editor for education brands. He holds an MA in Professional Development for Language Education and has worked with major English language schools, publishers, high-traffic language-learning blogs, and education platforms. If you send him an email, he'll reply. -- www.fabiocerpelloni.com

Emily M

Reviewer: Emily M

Expertise: English Language Teaching Specialist

Emily has been teaching Academic English to international students for over 10 years. She is a former IELTS examiner.