Scientific Decision-Making (AQA A Level Business) : Revision Note
Making decisions using data
Scientific decision making involves using data to make rational, logic-based decisions
This method lowers risk, but it isn’t perfect—good data cost money and numbers never tell the whole story
What the scientific approach involves
Set the objective
e.g. Increase sales of gym accessories to under‑25s by 5 % by November 2025
Collect data
A range of internal and external sources can provide useful insights
Internal data, such as
Sales and loyalty‑card records
Production logs
Finance systems
Website analytics
External data, such as
Government statistics
Industry reports
Social media trends
Customer reviews
Analyse data and select an option
Use statistics, A/B tests or forecasts to determine the best options, then make a choice with the strongest evidence
Implement the decision
Put in place the resources required, such finance, staff, equipment and premises
Review and learn
Compare outcomes with the original goal; make necessary changes to keep improving
Stages in the decision-making process
Scientific decision-making at Tesco
Stage | Explanation | Example |
---|---|---|
Setting objectives |
|
|
Gathering information |
|
|
Choosing an option |
|
|
Implementing the decision |
|
|
Reviewing the decision |
|
|
Benefits of scientific decision-making
Reduces risk
Decisions rest on evidence, not guess‑work
Firms using reliable data are more likely to report better outcomes
Justifies investment
Clear numbers help win the support of a board of directors, investors or lenders such as banks
Supports continuous improvement
Constant measurement helps a business to identify what works and what may need to be changed
Limitations of scientific decision-making
Cost and time
Gathering and analysing data is expensive
It may be unaffordable for smaller businesses or those with a poor cash situation
Data quality issues
Bad or biased data can lead to wrong or inappropriate decisions being made
Over‑reliance
Managers can ignore gut feel or ethics
They may miss out on opportunities that have a good chance of success because the data does not recognise their potential
Incomplete picture
Not all risks are measurable and relying on data means that businesses can miss surprises such as rapid market change
Intuition and decision-making
Managers sometimes rely on gut feel, experience and pattern‑spotting rather than detailed data analysis to choose a course of action
Experienced managers build quick mental shortcuts from years of experience, so their gut instantly signals, “This feels right”
Situations where intuitive decision-making may work best
Situation | Reason | Example |
---|---|---|
Little time for data |
|
|
No clear precedent |
|
|
Decision rests on human taste |
|
|
Benefits of intuitive decision-making
Speed
Rapid action can allow a business to seize opportunities before rivals can react
Creativity
It frees managers to pursue bold ideas that data might reject
Uses deep expertise
Experienced managers are based on past successes, failures and patterns
Limitations of intuitive decision-making
Bias and overconfidence
Personal likes or recent events can cloud judgement
Hard to justify
Convincing investors or lenders without data to back up ideas can be difficult
Riskier on big bets
A wrong hunch can be very costly, so managers risk their personal reputation in pursuing them
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?