Comparing Interpretations Questions (Edexcel GCSE History): Revision Note

Exam code: 1HI0

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary of Question 3 (b)

  • Question 3 (b) asks you to explain the difference between Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2

  • The interpretations used in Question 3 (b) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (c) and (d)

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Text discussing different views on German recovery from 1924-29, asking for the main difference and for details from both interpretations to be explained in the answer.
An example of Question 3 (b) in Paper 3

What is an interpretation question?

  • An interpretation is someone’s point of view about a historical event, person or time period

    • Interpretations focus on different ideas or evidence, so they may not always agree

  • These interpretations could be written:

    • After the event 

    • By people who were there at the time 

    • By historians

  • You will be given two interpretations from the Sources/ Interpretations Booklet

    • This is a separate booklet from your answer paper

    • It includes the key interpretations you’ll need for Section B

Interpretations of the Weimar Republic recovery. One emphasizes political stability and contentment from 1924-1929; the other focuses on economic fragility and dependence on foreign loans.
The two interpretations for the example Question 3 (b) in Weimar and Nazi Germany, 1918-1939 as they would look in the Sources/ Interpretations Booklet

Question 3 (b) - "What is the main difference?"

  • The interpretations used in in Question 3 (b) will always be different from one another

  • In the Edexcel Weimar and Nazi Germany 1918- 1939, interpretations are different based on the following themes:

    • Political developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi policies

    • Social and cultural developments e.g. Weimar or Nazi culture

    • Economic developments e.g. the effects of hyperinflation or the Wall Street Crash

"What is the main difference?" question structure

  • Your answer needs to:

    • Identify and explain the main difference in content between Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 (In)

    • Support your explanation with a short quote or clear summary from each interpretation (In)

  • To achieve full marks, you need to include both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 in your answer

Worked example of a "What is the main difference?" question

Worked Example

3 (b) Study Interpretations 1 and 2. They give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.

What is the main difference between these views?

Explain your answer, using details from both interpretations.

(4)

Two interpretations of Weimar Germany: one describes stability and contentment from 1924-1929; the other highlights economic fragility and dependence on U.S. loans.

Answer

Interpretations 1 and 2 have different views about how stable Germany's economic recovery was (In). Interpretation 1 argues that Germany was in a stable position by 1929. Interpretation 1 states that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). In comparison, Interpretation 2 believes that Germany had not recovered and its stability was fragile (In). It states that 'German prosperity was built on quicksand foundations' as it was 'dependent upon high-interest American loans' (In).

Summary of Question 3 (c)

  • Question 3 (c) asks you to explain why the interpretations are different

  • You should not repeat what you have written in Question 3 (b)

  • The interpretations used in Question 3 (c) will be the same interpretations used in Questions 3 (b) and (d)

  • You can use Sources B and C in this question

    • However, if you choose not to use them, you can receive full marks

Amount of marks 

4

The time that you should spend on the question 

No more than 5 minutes 

  • An example of the type of question you may encounter can be seen below:

Exam question asking to suggest one reason why two interpretations give different views about German recovery from 1924-29, using Sources B and C to explain. Worth 4 marks.
An example of Question 3 (c) in Paper 3

Question 3 (c) - "Why are interpretations different?"

  • Both Interpretation 1 and Interpretation 2 may have different interpretations due to:

    • The types of sources they have used

      • For example, some interpretations may have placed more weight on political sources whereas others may use more economic sources

    • The authors focus on short, medium or long-term developments or effects

      • For example, some interpretations may have focused on the short-term effects of an event, such as the Wall Street Crash

      • Others may focus on the long-term effects

  • Do not refer to provenance

    • You will not receive any marks for an explanation focused on the provenance

"Why are the interpretations different?" question structure

  • The most common way of structuring this answer is by using Sources B and C

    • One of the sources will support the argument made in Interpretation 1

    • The remaining source will agree with the argument given in Interpretation 2

    • Do not use Source A in your answer as you will not receive any marks

A comparison diagram showing how two interpretations match with two sources about Germany in the 1920s.

On the left side:

Interpretation 1 (by F. Reynoldson, 1996): Describes how the Weimar Republic was stronger from 1924 to 1929, with political cooperation and economic improvement. It says, “The Weimar Republic looked safe.”

Interpretation 2 (by E. Wilmott, 1997): Describes Germany’s economy as unstable, relying on American loans. It mentions that “small firms struggled and many went bankrupt.”

In the centre:

A light blue box explains: “Interpretation 1 matches Source B as it shows that some people believed by 1929, Germany had recovered from its economic challenges and was stable.”

A pink box explains: “Interpretation 2 matches Source C as it shows that some people knew that Germany’s stability was fragile and based on American economic support.”

On the right side:

Source B: A 1930 German journalist writes positively, saying Germany had raised itself up after Versailles and was recovering surprisingly quickly.

Source C: A 1929 speech by Gustav Stresemann says Germany is “dancing on a volcano” and warns that the economy would collapse if American loans were withdrawn.

Blue and red arrows connect the interpretations to the corresponding sources.
An illustration showing how to match up Sources B and C to Interpretations 1 and 2
  • Using this method, you would use the following structure in your answer:

    • State that the historians' viewpoints differ because they have given weight to different sources (In)

    • For Interpretation 1, state that they have looked at sources like Interpretation 1's matching source (either Source B or C)

    • Use quotes or details from the source and from Interpretation 1 to show how the connect (In)

    • Repeat this structure for Interpretation 2, using its matching source

  • Do not use irrelevant information from the interpretations that are not based on the question

    • For example, a student may focus on the mention of Nazis in Interpretation 1, and discuss Hitler's rise to power

    • This is not relevant and will not receive marks

Worked example of a "Why are the interpretations different?" question

Worked Example

3 (c) Suggest one reason why Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29.

You may use Sources B and C to help explain your answer.

(4)

Text from two historical sources about Germany's post-Versailles recovery. Source B: 1930 German journalist notes surprising progress. Source C: 1929 Gustav Stresemann speech warning economic fragility.
Two contrasting interpretations from different authors about the Weimar Republic, noting economic conditions and political stability from 1924 to 1929.

Answer

Interpretations 1 and 2 give different views about German recovery in the years 1924-29 because they have given weight to different sources (In). The author of Interpretation 1 will have considered historical sources like Source B. Source B is a journalist who argues how quickly Germany has 'raised herself up to shoulder the terrific burden of this peace'. This supports what is said in Interpretation 1 as they claim that 'the Weimar Republic was much stronger than it had been just after the war' (In). Whereas, Interpretation 2 will have studied sources like Source C. Source C is a speech by Stresemann which states that Germany in 1929 was 'dancing on a volcano' of economic stability. This supports what Interpretation 2 argues because it argues that Germany's stability was built on 'quicksand foundations' (In).

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.