Investigating the Effects of Random Sampling on Allele Frequencies (AQA A Level Biology): Revision Note

Exam code: 7402

Alistair Marjot

Written by: Alistair Marjot

Reviewed by: Ruth Brindle

Updated on

Random sampling & allele frequencies

  • Investigations to mimic the effects of random sampling on allele frequencies in a population can be devised using coloured beads, marbles or even sweets

  • An example of one such investigation is described below

Apparatus

  • 24 beads in one colour and 24 beads in a different colour

  • Jar or container

  • Paper

  • Pencil

  • Calculator

Method

  • Place 24 red beads and 24 white beads in a container

    • Red beads represent a dominant allele (R)

    • White beads represent a recessive allele (r)

  • Shake the container to ensure the beads are well mixed

  • Carry out a random 'mating' by drawing out two beads without looking

    • Each pair of beads drawn represents the fusing of a pair of sex cells containing either red or white alleles

  • Carry out 24 of these random 'matings' and note down the genotype of each offspring

    • Ensure you place the beads back into the container after each draw

  • The theoretical offspring genotype ratio (also known as the expected genotype ratio), if thousands of draws are made and there is no genetic drift, should be 1:2:1

    • RR = 25% (chance of drawing two red beads in a row)

    • Rr = 50% (chance of drawing a red bead, then a white bead or a white bead then a red bead)

    • rr = 25% (chance of drawing two white beads in a row)

  • A table of these theoretical results (for 24 random 'matings') is shown below:

Genotype

RR

Rr

rr

Tabulation

l l l l l l

l l l l l l l l l l l l

l l l l l l

Genotype frequency

(6/24) × 100 = 25%

(12/24) × 100 = 50%

(6/24) × 100 = 25%

Phenotype frequency

Red:

(18/24) × 100 = 75%

White:

(6/24) × 100 = 25%

Results

  • However, the chances of drawing exactly six double red beads (RR), twelve red and white beads (Rr) and six double white beads (rr), as shown in the table above, are very small

  • The effects of chance can mean that the offspring genotype ratio is likely to differ from the theoretical 1:2:1 offspring genotype ratio

    • This change in the expected offspring genotype ratio that occurs in a small breeding population is known as genetic drift

  • The table below shows some example results from 24 random "matings"

Genotype

RR

Rr

rr

Tabulation

l l l l l

l l l l l l l

l l l l l l l l l l l l

Genotype frequency

(5/24) × 100 = 20.8%

(7/24) × 100 = 29.2%

(12/24) × 100 = 50%

Phenotype frequency

Red:

(12/24) × 100 = 50%

White:

(12/24) × 100 = 50%

  • If these results now represent the alleles in a new population, the ratio of red and white alleles is different from the 24 red alleles and 24 white alleles in the original population:

    • Number of red alleles in new population = 5 x 2 (from RR) + 7 (from Rr) = 17

    • Number of white alleles in new population = 12 x 2 (from rr) + 7 (from Rr) = 31

  • As the white allele frequency has increased to 31 and the red allele frequency has decreased to 17, genetic drift has occurred

  • If 24 more random 'matings' are now carried out from the new population (i.e. by placing 17 red beads and 31 white beads in the container), the effect of genetic drift on the allele frequencies in the population can become even greater

  • The table below shows some example results from this second round of 24 random 'matings'

    • Number of red alleles in new population = 4 x 2 (from RR) + 5 (from Rr) = 13

    • Number of white alleles in new population = 15 x 2 (from rr) + 5 (from Rr) = 35

  • As the white allele frequency has now further increased to 35 and the red allele frequency has now further decreased to 13, an even greater amount of genetic drift has occurred

Genotype

RR

Rr

rr

Tabulation

l l l l

l l l l l

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Genotype frequency

(4/24) × 100 = 16.7%

(5/24) × 100 = 20.8%

(15/24) × 100 = 62.5%

Phenotype frequency

Red:

(9/24) × 100 = 37.5%

White:

(15/24) × 100 = 62.5%

Sampling & genetic drift

  • Using some simple maths, experiments like the one described above can be used to demonstrate genetic drift by calculating how allele frequencies change in a small population over multiple generations

  • For example, it is possible to calculate how the percentage frequency of the alleles in the population changes between generations:

    • In the first generation (original population) there were 24 red alleles and 24 white alleles. This means the percentage allele frequencies were:

      • (24 ÷ 48) × 100 = 50% red alleles

      • (24 ÷ 48) × 100 = 50% white alleles

    • In the second generation (after the first round of 'matings'), there were 17 red alleles and 31 white alleles. This means the percentage allele frequencies were:

      • (17 ÷ 48) × 100 = 35.4% red alleles

      • (31 ÷ 48) × 100 = 64.6% white alleles

      • This means that in one generation, the frequency of red alleles decreased by 14.6% and the frequency of white alleles increased by 14.6%

    • In the third generation (after the second round of 'matings'), there were 13 red alleles and 35 white alleles. This means the percentage allele frequencies were:

      • (13 ÷ 48) × 100 = 27.1% red alleles

      • (35 ÷ 48) × 100 = 72.9% white alleles

      • This means that in two generations (i.e. compared to the starting population before any 'matings' were carried out) the frequency of red alleles decreased by 22.9% and the frequency of white alleles increased by 22.9%

Modelling natural selection & genetic drift

  • Computer programs can simulate natural selection in a simplified population

  • Users can start off with a simple simulated population, with no particular selection pressures acting upon it

  • Natural selection can then be investigated by changing various factors and observing the effects on the simulated population. For example:

    • Selection pressures (e.g. predation, disease, food)

    • Mutation rates or introduce specific mutations

    • Dominance of alleles

    • Environmental changes

    • Adaptations of the species

  • These changes affect allele frequencies and simulate evolutionary outcomes

  • A key benefit is that evolutionary time can be sped up, allowing long-term effects to be observed quickly

  • Computer models can also simulate genetic drift, helping visualise how it differs from natural selection

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Alistair Marjot

Author: Alistair Marjot

Expertise: Environmental Systems and Societies & Biology Content Creator

Alistair graduated from Oxford University with a degree in Biological Sciences. He has taught GCSE/IGCSE Biology, as well as Biology and Environmental Systems & Societies for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. While teaching in Oxford, Alistair completed his MA Education as Head of Department for Environmental Systems & Societies. Alistair has continued to pursue his interests in ecology and environmental science, recently gaining an MSc in Wildlife Biology & Conservation with Edinburgh Napier University.

Ruth Brindle

Reviewer: Ruth Brindle

Expertise: Biology Content Creator

Ruth graduated from Sheffield University with a degree in Biology and went on to teach Science in London whilst also completing an MA in innovation in Education. With 10 years of teaching experience across the 3 key science disciplines, Ruth decided to set up a tutoring business to support students in her local area. Ruth has worked with several exam boards and loves to use her experience to produce educational materials which make the mark schemes accessible to all students.