IGCSE English Language CIE Examiner Report 2023: Summary

Examiner reports are invaluable resources for educators and students, offering insights into assessment criteria and highlighting common strengths and areas for improvement. 

The 2023 examiner report for CIE IGCSE First Language English (0500/11) offers invaluable guidance on where students are succeeding — and where they continue to struggle. Below is a summary of key messages from the report, with suggestions for how you might apply them in your teaching.

Key Messages

Students performed well when they:

• Worked through the paper in the set order, approaching each task systematically and building momentum across the paper

• Read the text introductions carefully, ensuring full understanding of the context and focus before answering

• Attempted all parts of every question, using the mark allocations to guide how much time and depth each response required

• Followed instructions accurately, basing their responses on the correct section of the text and addressing the task as set

• Responded directly to the command words, such as ‘explain’, ‘analyse’, or ‘summarise’, shaping their response accordingly

• Focused on demonstrating the specific skills assessed in each question, rather than offering unrelated or generalised answers

• Avoided repetition, invented content or irrelevant personal opinion, sticking closely to the text and the task

• Used their own words where required, particularly in summary and comprehension tasks, avoiding excessive quoting or copying

• Selected short, precise quotations when required, using them to support clear and focused analysis

• Planned their longer responses, ensuring ideas were logically organised and effectively developed

• Checked and edited their writing, correcting mistakes and refining unclear or incomplete points before finishing

Key Takeaways

Common Strengths

Paper 1: Reading Comprehension and Summary

• Well-structured responses that followed the order of the paper and used time effectively

• Focused use of textual evidence, particularly when students selected short, precise quotations rather than lifting whole sections

• Accurate comprehension in short-answer tasks, with students using their own words when required

• Improved language analysis, especially in Question 2(d), where stronger students explored the effect of word choices in context

• Effective interpretation in Question 3 (Response to Reading), with top candidates clearly understanding the character’s perspective and linking their writing closely to the text

Paper 2: Directed Writing and Composition

• Clear awareness of audience and purpose, especially in directed writing tasks

• Strong structure and paragraphing, helping candidates to organise their arguments or narratives clearly

• Creative engagement with prompts, with some students showing originality and flair in their narrative or descriptive writing

• Secure use of tone and register, with top responses demonstrating fluency and an appropriate voice throughout

Common Areas for Improvement

Paper 1: Reading Comprehension and Summary

• Failure to follow question instructions, particularly the requirement to use own words (e.g., Question 1(f))

• Over-reliance on copying, especially in the summary and extended questions, which limits evidence of understanding

• Superficial language analysis in Question 2(d), such as labelling techniques without exploring effects

• Poor time management, especially when students overwrote on early questions and rushed longer responses

• Loss of focus in Question 3, where weaker responses included irrelevant personal experiences or strayed from the perspective required

• Mechanical responses that repeated question wording or lacked original thinking

Paper 2: Directed Writing and Composition

• Weak openings and endings in both directed and creative writing — students often missed opportunities to hook or leave a lasting impression

• Lack of development in ideas — especially in narrative writing, where some responses were underdeveloped or lacked a clear resolution

• Limited vocabulary or repetitive phrasing, which hindered impact and reduced marks for style and accuracy

• Surface-level use of rhetorical features, especially in directed writing — e.g., listing devices without clear purpose or effect

• Errors in grammar and punctuation, which in some cases impeded meaning and communication

• Inconsistent tone — particularly in persuasive writing, where formal and informal styles were mixed inappropriately

Key Examiner Advice

For all papers

• Teach students to analyse language deeply rather than just identifying techniques

• Encourage precise references rather than excessive quotations

• Ensure students answer all parts of multi-part questions to maximise marks

• Help students practice summary skills regularly, focusing on conciseness and own words

• Improve writing clarity through structured planning and review

How to use the examiner report in the classroom

Research in assessment and feedback highlights that students improve when they clearly understand the expectations of examiners and can reflect on their own performance (Black & Wiliam, 1998).

One effective strategy is to present students with summarised insights from CIE examiner reports and ask them to analyse common mistakes and effective techniques. For example, students could review a list of key weaknesses (such as weak narrative structure or lack of focused analysis) and compare them to their own or a peer’s work. 

By identifying areas where they have made similar mistakes — or successfully applied high-scoring techniques — students gain a clearer understanding of what examiners look for and how they can refine their approach.

This process not only helps demystify assessment criteria, but also fosters a sense of accountability and self-regulated improvement, ensuring students actively engage with their learning rather than passively receiving feedback.

Addressing common issues

Below are some targeted classroom activities that could be used to address specific areas for improvement highlighted in the examiner report. 

By incorporating these strategies, teachers can help students internalise examiner expectations, leading to more confident, structured, and insightful responses in the CIE IGCSE English Language exam.

Improve Student Outcomes with Save My Exams

Over 1.5 million students use Save My Exams and they improve their grades by two grades on average. 

But we have plenty for teachers too. All of our resources have been created by teachers and examiners who know exactly what you need to support your students attain the highest grades. 

From fully annotated model answers to dozens of CIE IGCSE English Language past exam questions, to quiz-style questions to help retrieval practice, to bespoke mock exams (again, with full model answers), our tools help you to teach smarter, not harder.

Explore Save My Exams for Teachers

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: King’s College London School of Education.