Delegation & Accountability (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Business): Revision Note

Exam code: 9609

Lisa Eades

Written by: Lisa Eades

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

The relationship between delegation and accountability

  • Delegation occurs when responsibility for specific tasks is given to subordinates by managers 

    • It is particularly important in businesses with a flat organisational structure, where managers have a wide span of control

    • It usually involves transferring authority from manager to subordinate

      • E.g. The HR director of a large company delegates authority for recruitment and training to the Recruitment and Training Manager

    • Tasks that are delegated need to be well-defined, and instruction may be required

  • Accountability means that an individual has the responsibility to report on and explain their actions fully and honestly

    • Accountability requires several important components to be present

      • Clear expectations of anticipated outcomes are agreed upon

      • The accountable employee has appropriate skills, training and experience

      • Effective communication throughout the delegated task takes place, including ongoing feedback

      • There are clear consequences related to performance

  • Effective delegation involves giving both authority to subordinates to make decisions and demanding accountability for those decisions 

Implications of delegation

Implications for managers

Implications for workers

  • Allows managers to concentrate on important tasks

    • Managers do not have the time to do complete every task themselves

  • Delegation allows workers to feel empowered in decision-making

    • This can motivate staff as they are trusted to perform a job well

  • It helps managers measure the performance of their staff as they can judge how well subordinates carry out these tasks

  • Provides a form of training as workers learn on the job, thus increasing job opportunities to progress within the organisation

  • It can help reduce errors if managers delegate

    • Workers may be skilled in certain areas and have sufficient time to complete the task to a higher standard

  • Makes employees' work more interesting and rewarding

    • This could reduce absenteeism and labour turnover

  • When a manager delegates tasks, they give up a level of direct oversight

    • This can lead to inconsistent results if the task is not completed to the expected standard or if the employee lacks the required skills

  • Delegation can place stress on workers who may feel unprepared or unsupported when taking on more complex tasks.

    • If expectations are unclear or if the employee lacks confidence, added responsibility can reduce morale and lead to anxiety about making mistakes

  • Delegation may make it harder for a manager to stay informed about all aspects of the work

    • This is especially significant in fast-moving or high-stakes environments

  • When tasks are delegated, workers may do the work but not receive credit for their efforts

  • If the manager receives credit it can lead to frustration, demotivation and a sense of being undervalued

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In the exam, you could be asked to analyse delegation as a way to motivate workers. While some may see having more authority as a non-financial incentive that motivates them, some workers may be anxious about taking on extra responsibility or lack the appropriate skills. 

The difference between authority and responsibility 

  • Authority is the right or power to give orders, make decisions and control resources

    • It allows a person (usually a manager or supervisor) to direct others and take action to achieve business goals

  • Responsibility is the duty to complete a task or meet a target

    • It means being accountable for doing a job properly and on time, even if the task was delegated to someone else

Authority and responsibility: key considerations

  1. Authority and responsibility must go hand in hand

    • A person who is responsible for a task should also be given enough authority to carry it out effectively

  2. Authority should match responsibility:

    • For example, if a team leader is responsible for meeting a deadline, they need the authority to assign tasks, set priorities, and manage team members

    • If someone is responsible but has no authority, they might fail due to lack of power or resources

  3. Imbalance can cause problems

    • Too much authority but not enough responsibility can lead to misuse of power or unfair delegation

    • Too much responsibility but not enough authority can lead to frustration and failure to complete tasks

  4. Authority, responsibility and delegation

    • A manager may delegate authority and responsibility, but ultimate responsibility stays with the manager

    • For example, if a supervisor delegates stock checks to a worker, the worker is responsible for doing it, but the supervisor is still accountable overall

Conflicts between control and trust when delegating

  • Control is the manager’s need to monitor, direct, and ensure tasks are done correctly and on time

    • This control helps maintain standards and avoid mistakes and helps ensure the business is on track to achieve its goals

    • However, if a manager retains too much control, workers can feel micromanaged, reducing their morale and limiting their initiative

  • Trust is the belief that employees will complete tasks responsibly without needing constant supervision

    • When managers trust their subordinates, it builds confidence, improves relationships and increases motivation

    • However, too much trust without enough control may lead to errors, missed deadlines or a lack of accountability

Where conflict happens

Situation

Conflict

A manager gives a task but constantly checks in

  • This shows a lack of trust

  • Employee may feel they aren’t trusted to work independently, which can lead to low motivation, frustration and reduced confidence

  • It may also slow down progress if the employee keeps stopping to report back

A task is fully handed over with no follow-up

  • This shows too much trust without enough control

  • The manager may lose oversight of progress, miss early signs of problems or discover the task was done incorrectly too late

  • It puts the business at risk and can result in poor outcomes

An employee makes a mistake and the manager takes back control

  • This can damage future trust

  • If a manager quickly takes over after one mistake, the employee may become afraid to try again

  • This limits their growth, discourages learning from errors, prevents skill development, and also creates dependence on the manager

Case Study

Improving delegation at Fernside Hotels Group

Fernside Hotels is a small chain of boutique hotels across the UK.

The manager of one hotel, Sarah, needed to organise a last-minute promotional event to increase local bookings during a quiet season.

She delegated the task of planning the event to Callum, the hotel’s Events and Guest Experience Coordinator

Golden fern leaf beside the text "Fernsider Hotels Group" on a dark blue background, conveying a sense of elegance and luxury.

Conflict

  • Although Sarah delegated the task, she kept dropping in to check on Callum’s progress, making frequent suggestions and requesting small changes.

  • Callum began to feel undermined and frustrated

    • He had previously successfully managed smaller events and now felt a lack of trust

    • He became less confident about making decisions, which slowed down the planning process

  • Sarah was worried the event might not reflect the brand standards if she wasn’t closely involved

Conflict resolution

  • After an honest conversation, Sarah and Callum recognised the tension was hurting performance and morale

  • Sarah reflected on her approach and decided to manage delegation more effectively, using clear steps

Steps

Explanation

Clear expectations and deadlines

  • Sarah outlined the event goals of increasing weekend bookings, appealing to local families and reflecting the hotel’s eco-friendly image

  • She gave Callum a deadline for the full plan and explained the level of quality expected

Authority with support

  • Callum was given full responsibility for choosing suppliers, designing the promotional materials and managing bookings

  • Sarah made it clear she trusted him and that she’d be available for advice, but wouldn’t take over

Structured check-ins

  • They set two check-ins: one after the initial proposal and one closer to the event date

  • This allowed Sarah to stay informed and offer input only at useful points

Review of outcomes

  • After the event, which was a success and boosted weekend bookings by 30%, they sat down to reflect

  • Sarah praised Callum’s creativity and organisation, and they identified one or two areas for improvement next time

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lisa Eades

Author: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.