Evaluating Data on Lung Disease (AQA AS Biology): Revision Note

Exam code: 7401

Lára Marie McIvor

Written by: Lára Marie McIvor

Reviewed by: Naomi Holyoak

Updated on

Interpreting data: risk factors

  • A risk factor is any factor that is linked to an increased probability of suffering from a particular condition or disease

  • Lung disease risk factors include:

    • smoking

    • air pollution

    • exposure to certain chemicals at work

    • genetics

    • asthma

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You are not expected to know the lung disease risk factors, but you need to be able to interpret data on their relationship to the incidence of lung disease.

Worked Example

A medical research group considered the risk factors involved in worsening cases of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). They studied a group of 230 patients and calculated the effect of each risk factor as an odds ratio (OR), a value that represents the probability of worsening COPD in that group of patients in comparison to a group without exposure to that factor.

  • OR = 1: no association with worsening of COPD

  • OR > 1: associated with increased probability of worsening COPD

  • OR < 1: associated with decreased probability of worsening COPD

Risk factor

OR

Age 60+ years

1.05

Biological male

0.92

Current smoker

0.64

Hospitalised due to COPD in past year

3.26

Presence of other chronic conditions

1.5

Analyse the data to determine what they show about the risk factors studied and worsening of COPD.

[3]

Answer:

  • Being over 60 AND the presence of other chronic conditions have a slight association with increased probability of worsening COPD; [1 mark]

  • Being hospitalised in the past year has the strongest association with increased probability of worsening COPD; [1 mark]

  • Being male AND being a current smoker are associated with a decreased probability of worsening; [1 mark]

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The exam question above contains data that suggests that being male and being a smoker are not associated with increased risk from COPD, a finding that is contradictory to other data sources. In an exam you might be asked to consider why this has happened in this study; you could suggest explanations such as:

  • a small sample size

  • a lack of statistical testing

  • a failure to control other variables, e.g. diet

Evaluating data: risk factors

  • Data from studies into risk factors in disease incidence are often used to inform government policy, e.g. the introduction of health warnings on cigarettes, and bans on smoking in public places

  • This means that it is important that such data are interpreted accurately

  • There are several considerations that should be taken into account when analysing data from studies on risk factors:

    • Control variables: it is difficult to eliminate the effects of other variables, e.g. diet, activity levels and genetics, on the outcome of a study on a specific lifestyle factor

    • Sample size: the number of individuals in a study needs to be large enough to represent the population as a whole

    • Sample demographic: the sample needs to contain individuals that represent the target demographic

      • E.g. a study that includes women aged 20-40 cannot be used to determine the effect of a risk factor on men, or on women aged 50-60

    • Correlation vs causation: risk factor data tends to rely on correlation and does not always indicate a causal relationship

      • E.g. it would be unethical to conduct a controlled experiment that involves asking one random group of people to smoke 10 cigarettes every day for 10 years, and another to avoid smoking for 10 years, so researchers rely on asking people about their chosen lifestyle factors and looking for patterns in the data

    • Statistical tests: statistical testing should be used to determine whether any associations between variables are significant or due to chance

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Exam questions may ask you to evaluate conclusions from a data set. In this situation you must remember to consider all of the factors listed above; think about the design of the study, who it is meant to represent, whether we can correctly assume causation, and whether statistical tests have been carried out.

👀 You've read 1 of your 5 free revision notes this week
An illustration of students holding their exam resultsUnlock more revision notes. It’s free!

By signing up you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Log in

Did this page help you?

Lára Marie McIvor

Author: Lára Marie McIvor

Expertise: Biology, Psychology & Sociology Subject Lead

Lára graduated from Oxford University in Biological Sciences and has now been a science tutor working in the UK for several years. Lára has a particular interest in the area of infectious disease and epidemiology, and enjoys creating original educational materials that develop confidence and facilitate learning.

Naomi Holyoak

Reviewer: Naomi Holyoak

Expertise: Biology Content Creator

Naomi graduated from the University of Oxford with a degree in Biological Sciences. She has 8 years of classroom experience teaching Key Stage 3 up to A-Level biology, and is currently a tutor and A-Level examiner. Naomi especially enjoys creating resources that enable students to build a solid understanding of subject content, while also connecting their knowledge with biology’s exciting, real-world applications.

Download notes on Evaluating Data on Lung Disease