Political Influences (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Business): Revision Note
Exam code: 9609
An introduction to political influences
Political influences refer to the ways in which government actions, decisions, and policies can affect how a business operates
These can come from local, national or international governments
Laws and regulations
Businesses must follow rules related to health and safety, employment, consumer protection, and the environment
Breaking laws can lead to fines, damage to reputation or even being shut down
Taxation policy
Governments decide how much tax businesses must pay
Higher taxes can reduce profits
Lower taxes may encourage investment or expansion
Trade policies
Includes tariffs, quotas, and free trade agreements
These influence how easily businesses can buy and sell goods internationally
Government spending
When governments invest in infrastructure, such as roads, hospitals and schools, certain businesses benefit
During economic downturns, governments may also support industries through subsidies or grants
Political stability
Businesses prefer to operate in stable countries where laws and policies are predictable
In countries with unrest or frequent policy changes, there is more risk
Case Study
Nestlé India and changing environmental regulations
In 2019, the Indian government introduced strict environmental regulations to reduce plastic waste
This included phasing out single-use plastics, such as plastic straws and wrappers, used in food and beverage packaging
Responses
Nestlé India responded to the changing political environment by
Re-designing packaging for products, including Maggi noodles and chocolate bars
Investing in research to develop recyclable and biodegradable materials
Working with suppliers to source new eco-friendly packaging materials
Launching campaigns to inform customers of its new sustainability efforts
Impacts
Costs increased in the short term due to changes in materials and production
However, Nestlé improved its brand image, especially among environmentally aware consumers
The company avoided legal penalties and reputational damage by acting early
Privatisation
Privatisation occurs when government-owned firms are sold to the private sector
Examples of industries that are often privatised include transport, energy, telecommunications and healthcare services
Many government-owned firms have been partially privatised
The government retains a share in them so they can influence decision-making and receive a share of the profits
e.g. Shares in Singapore Airlines are 55% government-owned and 45% privately owned
Advantages of privatisation
1. Raises government revenue
Governments earn money from selling state-owned businesses
Funds can be used to reduce debt or invest in public services
2. Improves efficiency
Private firms aim to cut waste, boost productivity and earn profits
Often more innovative and customer-focused than public organisations
3. Reduces government spending
Running businesses is costly for governments
Selling them reduces long-term financial pressure
4. Encourages investment
Private ownership attracts both domestic and foreign investors
Can lead to more jobs and economic growth
E.g., Nigeria’s sale of NITEL helped expand mobile coverage
5. Increases competition and choice
Opens markets to new firms, giving consumers more options
Can lead to better services and lower prices
E.g. Privatising parts of Australia's rail and electricity sectors led to lower prices for customers
Disadvantages of privatisation
Disadvantage | Explanation | Example |
---|---|---|
Focus on profit over service |
|
|
Loss of public control |
|
|
Job losses |
|
|
Unequal access |
|
|
Risk of private monopoly |
|
|
Short-term thinking |
|
|
Nationalisation
Nationalisation is when a government takes ownership and control of a business or industry from the private sector
This means the service or company is now owned by the state and run on behalf of the public
Nationalisation usually happens in sectors that are considered essential or where private ownership has failed to meet the needs of society
Advantages of nationalisation
Nationalisation allows the government to directly manage industries that are vital to the economy or national security, such as transport, healthcare, or energy
This means it can set policies in the public interest, such as keeping prices affordable, ensuring services reach rural areas or responding quickly in times of crisis
Unlike private firms, state-owned businesses don’t need to maximise profit for shareholders
This means services can be designed to benefit citizens, workers and consumers more fairly
Prices may be lower, access more equal and working conditions more secure
When a business is nationalised, it may gain financial stability and access to long-term government investment
This can be especially helpful if the business was struggling under private ownership
Government backing also allows the company to focus on long-term goals, such as infrastructure development or environmental sustainability, without worrying about short-term profit pressures or investor demands
Disadvantages of nationalisation
Running a nationalised business can be very expensive
The government must fund day-to-day operations, invest in maintenance and improvements, and cover losses if the business isn’t profitable
This can place a strain on public finances, especially during economic downturns
Without the pressure to make a profit or compete with rivals, nationalised businesses may become less efficient
They might have more bureaucracy, slower customer service, or fewer incentives to innovate
Customers and workers may experience delays, outdated technology, or inconsistent quality
Nationalised businesses can be affected by political pressure, where decisions are made for short-term popularity rather than long-term success
Politicians may interfere in areas like pricing, recruitment or expansion, even if it goes against what’s best for the business
This can make planning and management difficult, especially as different governments often have diverse priorities
Case Study
Nationalisation of YPF – Argentina’s Oil Giant
Scenario
In 2012, the Argentine government made headlines when it nationalised 51% of YPF, the country’s largest oil company, which was majority-owned at the time by the Spanish firm Repsol. This dramatic shift brought a key energy asset back under state control

Reasons for nationalisation
Strategic industry control: Oil and gas are essential to Argentina’s economy and energy independence. The government argued that letting a foreign company control such a vital sector was risky
Falling investment: Repsol was accused of failing to reinvest enough in Argentina's oil infrastructure. As a result, domestic production was declining, forcing the country to import more energy, worsening its trade balance
Public interest and economic stability: The government believed nationalisation would allow Argentina to boost production, lower fuel import bills, and make energy more affordable and accessible, especially in rural and underserved regions
Outcome
Short-term benefits: Nationalisation helped stabilise energy supplies. The state could now steer investment toward long-term infrastructure goals and reduce reliance on imports
Increased government control: The move gave Argentina more control over pricing and supply, enabling subsidised fuel prices for domestic consumers
Legal and financial fallout: However, the nationalisation sparked international lawsuits. Argentina had to eventually compensate Repsol nearly $5 billion, which strained public finances
Efficiency concerns: Critics noted that YPF's productivity improved slowly, and the firm faced issues with bureaucracy, political interference, and a lack of innovation—typical drawbacks associated with state-run enterprises
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?