Flexible Organisations (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note

Exam code: 7132

Lisa Eades

Written by: Lisa Eades

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

The value of flexible organisations

  • A flexible organisation is one that can quickly change its structure, processes or resources in response to new challenges, such as shifting customer tastes, emerging technologies or unexpected events

Why is flexibility valuable?

  • Ultimately, flexibility will help to increase sales revenue or decrease costs

  • Several benefits of being a flexible business include:

  1. Rapid adaptation to change

    • When markets or customer needs change suddenly, a flexible firm can alter its products, prices or distribution channels without long delays, helping it stay competitive

  2. Efficient use of resources

    • Flexibility lets a business move staff, equipment or budgets to its busiest areas, so it avoids waste and makes the most of its available assets

  3. Boosts innovation

    • By encouraging teams to experiment and adjust how they work, flexible organisations create space for creative ideas and continuous improvement

  4. Stronger resilience

    • If there’s a supply chain disruption, new regulations or a sudden cost rise, a flexible company can reconfigure operations fast, reducing downtime and protecting profits

The flexibility to restructure

  • Restructuring is when a business makes significant changes to its organisation, operations or finance

  • It is intended to improve efficiency, cut costs or adapt to new circumstances

  • Restructuring might involve

    • Redrawing the organisational structure

      • Merging or splitting departments, redefining reporting lines and changing management roles

    • Divesting or combining business activities

      • Selling off non-core divisions or bringing separate activities under one roof

    • Outsourcing or insourcing functions

      • Shifting activities (e.g. payroll, IT or customer service) either to specialist external providers or back in-house

    • Financial reorganisation

      • Refinancing debt, renegotiating loans or altering the business's capital structure to reduce interest costs or improve cash flow

    • Workforce changes

      • Offering voluntary redundancies, making compulsory layoffs or redeploying staff to new roles

Advantages and disadvantages of restructuring

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Improved efficiency

    • Streamlining processes and removing duplicate roles helps work flow more smoothly.

  • Staff uncertainty

    • The fear of job losses or role changes can lower morale and productivity.

  • Cost reduction

    • Cutting overheads, selling assets or reducing the size of the workforce saves money over the long term

  • Up-front expenses

    • Redundancy payments, consulting fees and legal costs can be high

  • Sharper strategic focus

    • Divesting non-core activities lets a firm concentrate its resources on its strongest areas

  • Talent loss risk

    • Key employees may leave amid the upheaval, taking valuable skills with them

The flexibility to delayer

  • Delayering is the process of removing one or more tiers of management from an organisation’s hierarchy to create a flatter structure

Tall organisational structure

Flat organisational structure

Omby1HiR_1-4-3-different-types-of-organisation-structures---hierarchical
1-4-3-different-types-of-organisation-structures---flat
  • It usually means cutting out middle management levels and expanding the number of workers reporting directly to each remaining manager

Evaluating delayering

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Faster decisions

    • With fewer layers of hierarchy to navigate, approvals for decisions and feedback can reach staff quickly

  • Manager overload

    • Wider spans of control can leave managers stretched too thin, harming their focus and reducing the amount of support available for staff

  • Clearer communication

    • Messages and strategies pass through fewer intermediaries, reducing misunderstanding

  • Loss of experience

    • Removing layers may mean losing experienced managers whose knowledge and contacts vanish with them

  • Lower costs

    • Fewer managerial salaries and reduce overheads, improving profitability or freeing up funds for investment

  • Reduced morale

    • The upheaval and fear of redundancies can affect staff motivation and loyalty if they are not handled sensitively

  • Empowered teams

    • Remaining staff often take on more responsibility, which can increase their engagement and develop their skills

  • Limited promotion paths

    • With fewer management levels, opportunities for career progression are fewer, which can demotivate ambitious employees

Flexible employment contracts

  • Flexible working is the development of a culture where workers are equipped to do different roles or where they work in a range of employment patterns (full-time, part-time, zero hours contracts, work from home, etc)
     

  • Developing a flexible workforce can bring many benefits to a business

    • Each specific approach should be assessed, as there are potential disadvantages to each

Ways to develop a flexible workforce

Diagram showing ways to develop a flexible workforce: multi-skilling, flexible hours and home working, outsourcing, part-time and temporary roles.
Allowing workers to work from home is just one of several methods available to businesses to develop a flexible workforce 

1. Multi-skilling

  • Multi-skilling is the process of training workers to fulfil multiple job roles within a business

    • E.g. South West Airlines trains staff to handle multiple roles including check-in, baggage handling and customer service

Evaluating multi-skilling

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Business utilise their workforce more efficiently which reduces labour costs and increase productivity

  • It can help to improve patient outcomes in healthcare industries as workers with a broader range of skills can provide more comprehensive care

  • May require significant investment in training and development

  • May not be appropriate for all job roles, especially those that require a high level of expertise

 

2. Part-time and temporary working

  • Someone who works part-time may only work two or three days a week

  • Someone who works temporarily shows up for work whenever the business needs them

    • E.g. Amazon employs temporary workers to handle seasonal spikes in demand such as Christmas

Evaluating part-time and temporary working

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Flexible working arrangements can help businesses to attract and retain talent, especially staff who value work-life balance

  • This may improve productivity, as staff can work during their most productive hours and avoid distractions 

  • Flexible working arrangements can create challenges in terms of communication and collaboration (especially if staff are working remotely)

  • Monitoring and managing flexible workers can be more difficult 

3. Outsourcing

  • Apple outsources much of its manufacturing to Foxconn in China

    • This allows the company to produce products at a lower cost and maintain competitive pricing

Evaluating outsourcing

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • This may allow businesses to access specialised skills that may not be available in-house

  • May reduce labour costs

  • This may lead to a loss of control over quality and delivery, especially if the outsourcing partner is based in another country

  • This may create ethical concerns, especially if the partner is based in a country with lower labour standards or human rights abuses

4. Flexible hours

  • Flexible hours allow employees to schedule working hours around their individual needs and accommodate their commitments outside of work

  • A flexible hours schedule usually involves working some set hours, with the remainder of hours organised according to the employees' needs

    • E.g. An employee may be expected to be at work between the hours of 10am and 2pm, but can choose when they complete the rest of their working hours

5. Home working

  • Advances in communication technology have enabled a larger proportion of workers than ever before to work from home

    • Employees use tools such as email, instant messaging, collaborative software, scheduling apps and videoconferencing to carry out work remotely

  • Home working has a range of advantages and disadvantages for both the business and its employees

Evaluating homeworking

Advantages

Disadvantages

For the business

  • Smaller or fewer premises may be required, reducing costs

  • High quality workers may be attracted from a wide geographical area

  • Workers may be more productive if they work in isolation, away from distractions

  • The cost of equipping workers with technology to work remotely may be significant

  • There may be less opportunity for collaboration between workers, reducing innovation

  • Careful monitoring will be required to ensure remote workers remain focused on tasks

For the employee

  • Commuting costs, such as train fares, are eliminated

  • Stress reduced as a result of not having to travel to work

  • Some flexibility may be possible, allowing workers to manage other commitments

  • Staff may feel isolated from colleagues

  • Household costs such as electricity and heating may increase

  • A healthy division between work and home life may be difficult to manage

Organic versus mechanistic structures

1. Mechanistic structures

  • A mechanistic structure is a rigid, hierarchical design where decision-making is centralised, roles are clearly defined and communication follows formal channels

    • Everyone knows exactly who reports to whom and what procedures to follow

    • E.g. McDonalds staff follow standardised routines, managers make decisions centrally, and every restaurant follows the same strict operating manual

Evaluating mechanistic structures

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Clear authority

    • Everyone understands who makes decisions

  • Slow to change

    • Strict rules and layers of herarchy delay responses

  • Consistent quality

    • Standard procedures ensure uniform output

  • Low motivation

    • Few opportunities for staff to show initiative

  • Efficient scaling-up

    • Easy to roll out the same model widely

  • Poor innovation

    • Strict rules and routines stifle creative ideas

2. Organic structures

  • An organic structure is flexible and adaptive, with decentralised decision-making, few formal rules and open communication

    • Teams form and reform around tasks, and employees often take on broad, collaborative roles

    • E.g. Google’s engineers choose which projects to join, ideas flow between departments informally and decisions often happen at team level rather at the top of the business

Evaluating organic structures

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Quick adaptation

    • Teams can pivot fast from one focus to another when priorities change

  • Role uncertainty

    • Less rigid structures can confuse who’s responsible for tasks

  • Empowered employees

    • People feel trusted to solve problems, boosting their morale

  • Potential chaos

    • Too few rules can lead to duplicated efforts

  • Cross-functional teamwork

    • Removes barriers between teams and encourages innovative thinking

  • Coordination challenges

    • Teams may struggle to work toegther effectively without a clear chain of command

Knowledge and information management support organisational flexibility

  1. Faster decision-making

    • Access to real-time data helps staff make quick, informed decisions—essential in flat, decentralised structures

  2. Better collaboration

    • Shared systems enable teams across departments to work together smoothly in project-based or matrix structures

  3. Protects organisational memory

    • Captures key knowledge when roles change or layers are removed during restructuring or delayering

  4. Supports Flexible Working

    • Cloud-based systems allow remote teams to access and update information securely, anytime

  5. Encourages Innovation

    • Shared ideas, learnings and feedback loops help build a culture of continuous improvement

Case Study

Business Overview
SwiftConnect is a UK-based IT support and cloud solutions firm with 300 employees. In 2023, the company restructured into regional pods to improve agility and responsiveness.

To make this flexible model work, SwiftConnect invested heavily in knowledge and information systems.

Blue cloud with an upward graph line, accompanied by the words "Swift Connect IT" in bold blue text on a white background.

How KIM supported organisational flexibility

KIM Focus

Application at SwiftConnect

Faster decision-making

Regional leaders accessed live customer feedback and KPIs through shared dashboards

Collaboration across teams

All teams used central project hubs in Microsoft Teams to co-edit plans, track tasks, and share updates

Preserving knowledge

A searchable knowledge base documented fixes, FAQs, and onboarding materials

Flexible working

Cloud-based tools enabled remote access to all systems, reducing dependence on office-based staff

Driving innovation

Staff shared improvement ideas through an internal forum, reviewed monthly by management

Outcomes (in 6 months)

  • Decision speed improved: regional managers resolved 90% of issues without escalation

  • Project efficiency increased: 20% faster delivery of cross-departmental tasks

  • Knowledge base usage cut training time for new hires by 40%

  • Remote work uptake reached 85% with no drop in service quality

  • 14 employee-led improvements implemented from idea forum suggestions

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Did this page help you?

Lisa Eades

Author: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.