Problems With Strategy and Why Strategies Fail (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note
Exam code: 7132
The value of strategic planning
Strategic planning acts as a roadmap that aligns departments, guides decision-making, and helps businesses respond proactively to change
What is strategic planning?
Strategic planning typically involves:
Setting the mission, vision, and objectives of the business
Analysing the internal and external environment (e.g. using SWOT)
Making informed choices about competitive strategy, growth, resource use, and risk
Creating a coordinated action plan that links strategy to operations
Benefits of strategic planning
Benefit | Explanation |
---|---|
Provides clear direction |
|
Improves coordination |
|
Supports decision-making |
|
Encourages proactive thinking |
|
Increases accountability |
|
Builds investor and stakeholder confidence |
|
Strategic planning as a continuous process
Good strategic planning is not a one-time event—it is an ongoing cycle of:
Planning: setting objectives and strategies
Implementing: putting plans into action
Monitoring: tracking progress
Reviewing: updating the strategy in response to performance and environmental change
This ensures the strategy stays relevant and responsive over time
Difficulties of strategic decision making and implementing strategy
Creating a business strategy is challenging, but successfully delivering it is often even harder
Many well-intentioned strategies fail to achieve their goals due to:
Internal or external obstacles
Poor execution
Changes in the business environment
Poor planning
Lack of flexibility
Resistance to change
This section explores the pitfalls of strategic decision-making and implementation, and examines
The contrast between planned and emergent strategies
The causes and consequences of strategic drift, when a business’s strategy slowly loses relevance
The importance of evaluating strategic performance and being prepared for uncertainty through contingency planning and crisis management
By understanding why strategies fail, businesses can learn how to become more resilient, adaptive, and forward-thinking
Planned versus emergent strategy
A planned strategy is the deliberate approach that a business sets out in advance
It involves clear objectives, detailed plans, and specific actions intended to achieve certain goals.
An emergent strategy is an approach that develops over time as the business adapts to changing circumstances
It isn't deliberately planned from the beginning but arises in response to unexpected opportunities or challenges
Initially, a business’s planned strategy should align closely with its emergent strategy
However, businesses often find that their final strategy becomes a combination of planned intentions and emergent adaptations
Divergence of planned and emergent strategy
Changing external environment
New competitors, technological changes, or shifts in customer behaviour may force a business to adapt its planned strategy
Internal factors
Unexpected internal events, such as leadership changes or resource shortages, may cause a business to change its original plans
Opportunities and innovation
Businesses may discover new market opportunities or innovative ideas along the way, requiring a shift away from the original plan
Strategic drift
Initially, a business's strategy usually aligns well with external conditions, such as market trends, customer demands, and competitors’ actions
However, over time, the external environment can change, and if the business fails to adapt effectively, strategic drift occurs
Reasons for strategic drift
Slow response to change
Managers may fail to notice or underestimate the significance of external changes, leading to delayed responses
Resistance from employees and management
Staff or managers may resist changes to familiar ways of working, making adaptation difficult
Lack of innovation
Businesses that don’t continually innovate or refresh their approach risk falling behind competitors who do
Overconfidence and complacency
Previous success may lead managers to believe current strategies will always work, ignoring signs that change is needed
Consequences of strategic drift
If strategic drift isn't corrected, it can lead to:
Loss of competitive advantage
Declining sales and market share
Reduced profitability and financial instability
Ultimately, business failure if the drift continues unchecked
Case Study
Nokia’s strategic drift in the smartphone market
Finnish company Nokia was once the global market leader in mobile phones, known for reliability and innovation
However, from around 2007 onwards, Nokia experienced strategic drift, causing a significant decline in its competitiveness
Causes of strategic drift
Slow Response to Change:
Nokia underestimated the importance of touchscreen technology and user-friendly software, initially dismissing Apple’s iPhone as a niche product.
Resistance to Change:
Managers at Nokia believed their traditional strength in durable, reliable handsets would always dominate. This complacency meant they were slow to embrace the smartphone revolution.
Lack of Innovation:
Nokia failed to innovate quickly enough in smartphone technology, falling behind competitors like Apple and Samsung, who rapidly adapted to consumer demands.
Consequences of strategic drift
Nokia’s market share collapsed dramatically within a few years
The business became unprofitable and lost significant brand loyalty
Eventually, Nokia sold its phone division to Microsoft in 2014, highlighting how strategic drift can lead to business failure if not addressed effectively
Evaluating strategic performance
Once a strategy has been implemented, it’s essential for businesses to evaluate its effectiveness
This allows decision-makers to assess whether the strategy is meeting its objectives, identify areas for improvement, and ensure continued competitiveness
What is strategic performance evaluation?
Strategic performance evaluation is the process of measuring how well a chosen strategy is delivering its intended outcomes
It focuses on both quantitative data (e.g. profit margins, market share) and qualitative insights (e.g. employee morale, customer satisfaction)
Why evaluate strategic performance?
Purpose | Explanation |
---|---|
Measure success |
|
Inform future decisions |
|
Identify strengths and weaknesses |
|
Accountability |
|
Improve resource allocation |
|
Tools and metrics used
Tool / metric | What It evaluates |
---|---|
Financial data |
|
Market performance |
|
Balanced scorecard |
|
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) |
|
Benchmarking |
|
Stakeholder feedback |
|
When should evaluation occur?
Evaluation should be:
Ongoing: not just at the end of a strategic cycle
Built into the implementation process: through regular performance reviews
Responsive: results should be acted upon quickly where performance is off track
Challenges in evaluation
Unclear objectives
Makes it hard to measure success accurately
External factors
Market changes can affect outcomes beyond the business's control
Time lags
Some strategies take years to deliver measurable outcomes
Subjective judgement
Qualitative data may be harder to interpret consistently
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?