The Impact of Innovation on the Functional Areas (AQA A Level Business): Revision Note
Exam code: 7132
The impact of innovation on functional areas
Adopting an innovation strategy can have a significant impact on the various functional areas of a business
Impacts of innovation on functional areas
Functional area | How innovation can help | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|
Marketing |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Human Resources |
|
|
Operations / Production |
|
|
Case Study
EcoRide Ltd is a mid-sized UK manufacturer of electric bicycles based in the West Midlands
In 2024 the firm launched two big innovations at the same time:
Product innovation: an “AI-Assist” e-bike that adjusts power output to the rider’s habits and road gradients
Process innovation: a semi-automated frame-welding line using collaborative robots (“cobots”)
Why EcoRide chose to innovate
Sales growth had slowed to 4% a year as rivals copied its earlier models.
Rising labour costs threatened profit margins
A government grant covering 25% of capital spending on green technology made automation more affordable
Impacts on the main functional areas
Marketing
Positive: The AI-Assist bike grabbed media attention and won a “Best Commuter Tech” award, lifting website traffic by 60 % in four weeks
Negative: Some buyers found the companion app tricky to set up
Outcome: Step-by-step video guides were added to the app, and a live chat helpline was opened
Finance
Positive: The automated line cut welding labour cost per frame by 35 %, raising the gross margin on every bike by £42 once full output was reached
Negative: Up-front spending was heavy: £3.2 million on cobots and £1.1 million on software. Cash flow turned negative for two quarters, forcing EcoRide to extend an overdraft at 7% interest
Outcome: Management negotiated a £1.5 million, five-year green-technology loan at 3% to replace the costly overdraft
Human resources
Positive: Introducing “innovation days” (staff can spend Friday afternoons on their own improvement ideas) boosted employee-engagement scores from 68 % to 82%
Negative: The firm needed software engineers and data analysts to maintain the AI system. Average recruitment cost per specialist hire was £9,500, three times higher than for production staff, putting pressure on the wage bill
Outcome: A partnership with a local college launched a two-year software apprenticeship scheme, securing a future talent pipeline at lower cost
Operations
Positive: The cobot line increased maximum output from 1,200 to 1,800 frames per week and reduced defect rates from 3.5% to 1.2%
Negative: During the first month of installation, unplanned downtime ran to 42 hours while technicians adjusted sensor settings, delaying some deliveries to dealers
Outcome: A spare-parts trolley and rapid-response maintenance team were stationed next to the cobot cell to cut any future downtime
Outcome after one year
Revenue grew by 18%, reversing the earlier slowdown
Net profit margin rose from 8% to 10% despite higher interest charges
The AI-Assist model now makes up 35% of unit sales, with customer satisfaction at 4.6 / 5 after app improvements
Staff turnover fell from 12% to 8% thanks to the innovation day scheme and clearer career paths in software roles
The payback period on the automation project is on track at 2.8 years, slightly better than the original three-year forecast
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?