Punishment (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Punishment
Punishment is often seen as an important way to prevent crime and maintain social order
There are two key justifications:
Reduction
Retribution
Reduction (instrumental)
Punishment as a means to an end: its purpose is to reduce crime in the future
Deterrence:
Punishing offenders discourages them from reoffending, and 'making an example' deters the wider public
Rehabilitation:
Punishment reforms offenders so they no longer offend. E.g., prison education and training programmes to prepare offenders for work on release
Incapacitation:
Punishment physically prevents offenders from offending again. Imprisonment is the classic example – popular with politicians under the 'prison works' philosophy
Retribution (expressive)
Punishment as 'paying back': as offenders deserve to be punished for crimes already committed
Expresses society’s outrage and moral boundaries
Society takes its revenge, reaffirming the moral code
Retribution is not about future crime reduction but about symbolic justice
Sociological perspectives of punishment
Sociologists are interested in the relationship between punishment and society
They consider the punishment's function, why it varies over time, and how it relates to the society in which it is found
Functionalist view
Functionalists like Durkheim (1893) argue that punishment reinforces social solidarity and collective values
Rituals of order, such as public trial and punishment, reaffirm shared morality and unite society
Two types of justice
Retributive justice (traditional societies):
Harsh, expressive punishments (e.g., executions) were used to enforce conformity
Restitutive justice (modern societies):
Aims to repair damage and restore order (e.g., compensation)
Though largely instrumental, it also expresses collective emotion
Marxist view
Punishment serves the interests of the ruling class by defending property and maintaining the capitalist order
As part of the repressive state apparatus, prisons and harsh sentences discipline and control the working class
Melossi & Pavarini (1981)
Prisons mirror capitalist relations of production
Capitalism puts a price on time; e.g., prison 'repays a debt' by 'doing time'
Both prison and the factory involve strict discipline, subordination, and loss of liberty
Imprisonment today
Prisons are the main form of punishment in liberal democracies, but their effectiveness is questionable:
High reoffending rates: around two-thirds of prisoners reoffend, suggesting prisons can be seen as ‘universities of crime’ where prisoners learn additional criminal techniques
Costly and damaging: overcrowding, poor sanitation, bad food, lack of education/work opportunities (Carrabine et al., 2014)
Inequalities: The UK imprisons a higher proportion than most of Western Europe; the population is largely young, male, poorly educated, with ethnic minorities overrepresented
Mass incarceration
Garland (2001) argues that the USA has shifted into an era of mass incarceration:
In 1972, there were around 200,000 inmates in state/federal prisons
Now there are 1.5 million in state/federal prisons, plus 700,000 in local jails and 5 million under supervision in the criminal justice system
US imprisonment rates are 3× higher than in Europe, despite similar victimisation rates
The reason for this mass incarceration, according to Garland, is the growing politicisation of crime and 'tough on crime' policies
Transcarceration
Offenders often move between different institutions, such as being brought up in care, then sent to a youth offenders institution, adult prison and stay in psychiatric hospitals
This shows the blurring of boundaries between criminal justice and welfare systems
Although alternatives exist (community sentences, restorative justice), imprisonment remains central
Evaluation of punishment
Strengths
Visible form of justice
Punishment provides a clear social response to wrongdoing
Reassures victims and communities that justice is done, reinforcing trust in the system
Labelling theory support
Labelling theory supports rehabilitation: offering reform avoids stigmatising offenders as 'non-people'
Programmes like prison education or restorative justice can reduce reoffending if implemented effectively
Criticisms
High reoffending rates
Prisons often fail to rehabilitate, as many offenders return to crime after release
The high reoffending rates indicate that many are not put off by prison; therefore, punishment alone is not effective in reducing long-term offending
Class and power bias
Bias in the criminal justice system may mean some escape punishment
Laws and punishments disproportionately target the working class while ignoring corporate crime
Imprisonment acts as a tool of social control to protect ruling-class interests
Mass incarceration
Particularly in the US, imprisonment has reached crisis levels, with overcrowding and poor conditions
Critics argue that mass incarceration is about control and political posturing, not genuine crime reduction
Many prisoners need treatment (for mental illness or drug addiction), not punishment
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Be prepared to answer a short-answer question on why punishment may or may not be effective in controlling crime.
For a 4-mark question, make sure you:
Give two clear reasons (for or against effectiveness)
Add a short explanation to develop each point
Always link back to punishment and crime control
Examiners note that many students lose marks by writing vague responses, forgetting to mention punishment directly (e.g. prison), or wrongly focusing on displacement instead.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?