Crime & Globalisation (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
The global criminal economy
Globalisation has created a worldwide criminal economy worth over £1 trillion per year (Castells, 1998)
Forms include:
arms trafficking to illegal regimes and terrorists
trafficking nuclear materials from former communist states
smuggling illegal immigrants, e.g., Chinese Triads
trafficking women & children for sex work/slavery
trafficking endangered species for traditional medicine
trafficking body parts for organ transplants in rich countries
drug trade, e.g. cocaine from Colombia and heroin from Afghanistan
cybercrime, such as hacking, ID theft, viruses, and online fraud
money laundering of organised crime profits
Demand and supply
Demand comes mainly from the wealthy West (e.g., drugs, sex work, cheap goods)
Supply comes from low- and middle-income countries where crime (e.g., drug cultivation) provides income and survival
Global risk consciousness
Globalisation has produced new insecurities, such as terrorism, migration, and climate change
Risks are now seen as global rather than local
E.g., the movement of migrants and asylum seekers has fuelled anxieties about crime and disorder in Western countries
Much of our knowledge of risks comes from the media, which often exaggerates threats and fuels moral panics (e.g., 'migrant crisis')
The political response has often been increased border controls and surveillance
Globalisation and increasing crime
Globalisation has increased crime in several ways
Effects on local crime
Taylor (1997) argues that globalisation gives free rein to market forces, which increases inequality and rising crime
Deindustrialisation, where transnational corporations move manufacturing to low-wage countries, has led to job insecurity, unemployment, poverty and marginalisation
The impact of this is that the poor turn to crime and look for illegitimate job opportunities, e.g., drug dealing and gang crime
Drugwise (2016) estimated 306,000 heroin users in the UK were responsible for over 50% of property crime, funding global drug networks
Inequality
Globalisation has resulted in mass unemployment and poverty in the USA and UK
Marxists and left realists argue this is a major cause of crime because the poor feel envy, hostility and relative deprivation
Consumerism
Globalisation spreads consumerist values throughout the world
Reiner (2007) argues that the inability to achieve the status and goals marketed by capitalism leads to rising crime rates in Western societies
Marxists argue that capitalism is criminogenic – it produces crime both locally and globally
Opportunity
Globalisation creates new opportunities for crime and new types of crime, such as:
cybercrime
human and drug trafficking
money laundering
smuggling of goods and people
Crimes of the powerful
Global companies exploit global markets by:
moving production to low-cost countries with weaker labour and environmental laws
subcontracting 'flexible' workers, often below minimum wage, in illegal or unsafe conditions
using 24-hour offshore banking allows tax avoidance
exploiting deregulated financial markets for insider trading
These are examples of corporate crimes, showing how elites profit from globalisation while avoiding accountability
'Glocal' crime
Hobbs and Dunningham (1998) observe that the way crime is organised is linked to the economic changes brought by globalisation
They argue that crime is increasingly 'glocal' in character – local in organisation but linked to global networks
Individuals act as hubs in loose networks, combining legal and illegal opportunities
Crimes vary by local context but are shaped by global markets (e.g., drug supply chains)
Examples
Drugs trade: Prices/profits for UK dealers depend on global cartels’ ability to move drugs efficiently, while avoiding detection
Prostitution – National Crime Agency (2014) estimates 3,000–4,000 women trafficked annually into the UK by Eastern European gangs. to work against their will as constrained prostitutes
Smuggling – Glenny (2009) estimated the UK loses £6 billion annually in taxes from cigarettes smuggled in from Eastern Europe
Globalisation and decreasing crime
Globalisation has led to new ways of tackling crime more effectively, making it harder for offenders to operate across borders
Transnational policing & intelligence sharing
International agencies such as Interpol and Europol now share information across borders
This improves coordination, tracking, and extradition, making it harder for criminals to hide in other countries
Surveillance & biometrics
Shared databases (e.g. biometric passports), facial recognition, DNA records, and CCTV analytics make it easier to identify and trace offenders
Haggerty and Ericson (2000) describe how different technologies combine (e.g., CCTV, credit card data and GPS tracking) to create 'data doubles' of individuals, helping to monitor movement and activity
Risk management
In today’s 'risk society' (Beck), crime prevention focuses on predicting and preventing crime before it happens
Garland (2001) calls this 'actuarial justice', where resources are directed to high-risk groups and places
E.g., airports use passenger profiling to spot potential offenders or terrorists before boarding
Border governance & supply-chain controls
International agreements mean stronger checks at borders, container scanning, and shared watchlists
Nadelmann & Andreas show how global cooperation has tightened control over trafficking and smuggling routes
Evaluation of globalisation and crime
Strengths
Valuable research
Highlights new and serious forms of crime (e.g. cybercrime, trafficking, terrorism) that were previously overlooked
This helps criminologists and policymakers understand how global as well as local forces shape crime
Global–local connections
Shows how international processes such as migration, trade, and digital networks influence crime at the local level
Demonstrates that globalisation does not replace local crime but interacts with it in complex ways
Criticisms
Secretive and complex nature
Crimes like global financial fraud or trafficking are difficult to research because they require specialist knowledge
Reliable statistics are often unavailable, raising questions about the validity of research findings
Impact may be exaggerated
Globalisation has had a greater impact on crime in some regions than others, especially where corruption and weak policing are common
In countries with strong law enforcement, globalisation may have less of an effect on everyday crime patterns
Most crime is low-level
The majority of offences remain routine, everyday crimes committed within local communities
This suggests globalisation may play a smaller role than claimed in shaping overall crime rates
Examiner Tips and Tricks
When debating whether globalisation increases or decreases crime, make sure you cover both sides:
Increases crime:
Growth of transnational organised crime (Castells), such as drugs, trafficking, and cybercrime
Green crime (Beck; South) — environmental harm is global in cause and effect
State crime (Cohen; Green & Ward) — human rights abuses linked to war, terror, and global pressures
Decreases crime:
Transnational policing (Interpol, Europol) improves coordination, extradition, and intelligence
Surveillance and risk management (Haggerty & Ericson; Beck; Garland) predict and prevent crime across borders
In 30-mark essay questions, balance both sides and end with a judgement about whether globalisation overall strengthens or weakens crime control.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?