Sociology & Social Policy (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Social policy
Social policy can be defined as:
A government strategy to tackle social issues such as poverty, unemployment, child abuse, domestic violence, and homelessness
Examples of social policies include
education reforms
welfare policies
health and housing initiatives
laws on crime and justice
Policies are usually based on research evidence, political ideology, and practical concerns
Sociology plays a role in studying how policies affect society and sometimes provides evidence to guide new policies
Social problems and sociological problems
Worsley (1977) provides a clear distinction between social problems and sociological problems
Social problems
Issues in society that cause personal troubles or public conflict
E.g., poverty, domestic violence, educational failure, and crime
Governments often commission sociologists to research these issues and design solutions
Sociological problems
Any pattern or behaviour in society that sociologists want to study, whether or not it is seen as a 'problem', e.g.,
why people follow religion
why working-class children underachieve
why some groups commit more crime than others
Researchers aim to increase our understanding of society, not always to solve problems through policy
The influence of sociology on policy
Sociologists may research social problems, but this doesn’t mean their findings will shape government action
The impact of sociological research depends on several factors:
Electoral popularity
Ideological and political bias
Interest groups
Globalisation
Critical sociology
Cost of implementation
Funding
Electoral popularity
Politicians are more likely to adopt policies that win votes
Research findings that suggest 'unpopular' solutions may be ignored
E.g., higher taxes on the wealthy might reduce inequality, but could lose votes
Ideological and political bias
Governments tend to favour research that fits their political values and ideology
E.g., a Conservative government is more likely to use New Right research (such as Murray on welfare dependency) than Marxist research that blames inequality on capitalism
Interest groups
Powerful groups (e.g., businesses, media) can pressure governments to reject or adopt certain policies
E.g., persuading the government not to raise the minimum wage, even though it may reduce poverty
Globalisation
International organisations (e.g., the EU, UN, IMF, and World Bank) influence national policies, sometimes more than domestic sociologists
Governments may follow their advice or requirements, regardless of local sociological research
Critical sociology
Governments are less likely to use research from perspectives that challenge the status quo, such as Marxism or radical feminism
Such research may be seen as too 'ideological' or threatening to power
Cost of implementation
Even if research suggests effective policies, governments may reject them as too expensive or impractical
E.g., expanding welfare provision or education reform often requires heavy investment
Funding and policymakers
The source of funding can shape what kind of research is done and whether findings are taken seriously
Research commissioned by government departments may be more likely to influence policy than independent critical research
Perspectives on social policy and sociology
Some sociological perspectives argue that social policies should improve opportunity, equality and justice, particularly for poorer sections of society
They believe that more social policy is required in the form of spending on education and investment in inner-city areas to create jobs
Others, e.g., the New Right, believe that government interference in people's lives should be kept to a minimum
Positivism and functionalism
Positivism and functionalism see sociology as a science that should provide objective solutions to social problems
Functionalists argue that policies help society run smoothly by fixing dysfunctions
E.g., Durkheim supported education as a way to promote social solidarity
Functionalists prefer social policy that brings about gradual social change that promotes consensus and social integration rather than radical transformation
E.g., the 1944 Butler Education Act was a gradual reform aimed at extending opportunity and social mobility
However, this view can be argued to be too optimistic as it ignores inequality and power interests
Social democratic perspective
Sociology should highlight inequalities and provide evidence for reform
Social democrats advocate social policy that aids the redistribution of wealth to reduce poverty and promote fairness
E.g., the Black Report (1980) highlighted class inequalities in health and recommended reforms via welfare spending
However, Marxists argue that such policies only 'patch up' capitalism, tackling symptoms, not causes
Marxism
Marxists see society as divided by class conflict
Social policy is shaped by the capitalist nature of the state and mainly benefits the ruling class, not the working class
Policies may give the illusion of helping workers, but they maintain exploitation and prevent revolution
E.g., welfare benefits keep workers healthy enough to work, but don’t remove inequality
However, critics argue that this view is too deterministic and ignores policies that have genuinely improved working-class lives
Feminism
Policies can promote equality of opportunities for women
E.g., liberal feminists advocate social policies on equal pay, anti-discrimination, and domestic violence support
Radical feminists see some policies as reflecting patriarchy and reinforcing gender roles
E.g., tax and benefit systems assume women are dependent on men
However, critics argue that the feminist view generalises all women's experiences and ignores progress made
Left realism
Sociology should directly inform policy, especially on crime
Left realists believe that crime can only be reduced by social policies that tackle deprivation, poverty and inequality
E.g., practical reforms like community policing to reduce crime and fear of crime
However, this perspective can be criticised for being too reformist – it doesn't challenge deeper inequalities
The New Right
The New Right advocate minimal state intervention
Sociology should criticise policies that create welfare dependency and undermine personal responsibility
The New Right supports policies that encourage self-reliance and strong families and punish deviance
E.g., Charles Murray (1984) argued that welfare benefits create an 'underclass' dependent on the state
However, this view is seen as blaming the poor for inequality and ignoring the structural causes of problems
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In a 10-mark Theory & Methods question, you could be asked to outline and explain two perspectives on the purpose of social policy. To score well, you must:
Identify a perspective (e.g. functionalism, Marxism, feminism, New Right)
Explain how it sees the purpose of policy (e.g. functionalists: policies maintain social solidarity and stability; Marxists: policies maintain ruling-class power)
Give specific examples of policies to illustrate (e.g. NHS and Butler Education Act for functionalism; welfare cuts or EMA for Marxism; childcare provision for feminism; welfare dependency for New Right)
Keep focus on the question — it’s about the purpose of policy, not just describing the theory or the policy in isolation
Don’t just describe theories or list policies — you need to show how each perspective links policies to their role in society.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?