Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2025

First exams 2027

Solutions to Market Failure: Other Solutions (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE Economics): Revision Note

Exam code: 0455 & 0987

Steve Vorster

Written by: Steve Vorster

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

Direct provision and regulation

Direct provision of goods and services

  • Public goods are beneficial for society and are not provided by private firms due to the free rider problem

  • The government will often step in and provide these goods for its citizens

    • Examples include roads, parks, lighthouses, national defence

  • Merit goods are provided by the free market, but they are underprovided so governments will step in to fill the provision gap

  • The government will often step in and provide these goods for its citizens

    • Examples include education and healthcare

Evaluating direct provision to solve market failure

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • They are usually provided free at the point of consumption

  • Accessible to everyone regardless of income

  • Usually provide both private and external benefits to society

  • Paid for through general taxation

  • There is an opportunity cost associated with their provision

  • Products which are free may result in excess demand and long waiting times

    • For example, patients may wait for necessary operations at public hospitals for months or years

Regulation

  • Governments create rules to limit harm from the external costs of consumption/production

  • They often create regulatory agencies to monitor that the rules are not broken

Evaluating the use of regulation to solve market failure

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Individuals or firms may be fined or imprisoned for breaking the rules

    • For example, selling cigarettes to minors is a punishable offence

  • They help to reduce the external costs of demerit goods

  • Fines can generate extra government revenue

  • Enforcing laws requires the government to hire more people to work for the regulatory agencies

  • Enforcing laws can be difficult as it is a complex process to determine if firms or consumers are breaking the laws

  • The regulation may create underground (illegal) markets which could generate even higher external costs on society

Privatisation and nationalisation

Privatisation

  • Privatisation occurs when governments transfer ownership and control of firms or assets from the state (public sector) to the private sector (private firms)

  • Many state firms are monopolies

    • By privatising them, it encourages more competition in those markets

  • This may result in more efficiency and lower prices for consumers

Evaluating privatisation to solve market failure

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Increases government revenue in the year the asset is sold

  • Private firms may run the business more efficiently

  • The government no longer needs to manage the business or hire people to work for it – this reduces government expenditure

  • Government assets are often sold well below their actual market value

  • Private firms often provide a substandard good or service as they cut quality to increase profits

  • The price of the good or service usually increases as firms seek to maximise their profit

  • Many privatised companies still maintain considerable market power and have to be regulated, e.g. water companies

Nationalisation

  • Nationalisation occurs when the government takes control and ownership of firms which were in the private sector

    • Sometime they will pay to nationalise firms

    • Other times they will seize the assets and assume ownership

Evaluating nationalisation to solve market failure

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Nationalisation can generate efficiencies, especially when delivering utilities (gas, water, electricity) to the national population

  • It creates more equity in society, as all citizens have the same access to the same resource at the same price

    • e.g. Norway nationalised much of the oil industry when oil was first discovered in 1972. The profits belong to the citizens

  • The business can generate significant revenue for the government

  • Government firms can often run very inefficiently

  • There is an opportunity cost associated with the money required to run it

  • The government may lack the expertise to run the business

Case Study

Nationalisation of YPF in Argentina

In 2012, the Argentine government nationalised YPF, the country’s largest oil and gas company, which had previously been majority-owned by the Spanish firm Repsol.

Businessman in a suit stands beside a handshake, a contract, and an industrial factory labelled "YPF", symbolising corporate agreement and industry.

Context

  • Argentina had been facing energy shortages and a growing dependence on imported fuel

  • The government accused Repsol of under-investing in oil exploration and production, leading to falling output

The nationalisation

  • The Argentine state took control of 51% of YPF’s shares

  • The aim was to increase domestic energy production, reduce reliance on imports, and protect strategic national interests

Benefits (from the government's perspective)

  • More control over a key industry: Energy is vital to economic stability and growth

  • Increased public investment: The government could direct funds into exploration and infrastructure

  • Reduced fuel imports: Boosting domestic output helped reduce Argentina’s trade deficit

Challenges and drawbacks

  • Legal disputes: Repsol demanded compensation, resulting in a lengthy legal and diplomatic conflict

  • Reduced foreign investor confidence: Nationalisation created uncertainty for other foreign companies

  • Mixed performance: While production improved slightly, efficiency and profitability remained issues

Outcome

The nationalisation of YPF shows how governments may intervene in strategic industries to protect national interests

However, it also highlights trade-offs between sovereignty and market efficiency and the potential risks to international investment

Quotas

  • A quota is a government-imposed limit on the quantity of a good or service that can be produced, consumed or imported over a specific period

    • Quotas can be used to conserve resources, protect domestic industries or control market outcomes

  • In the context of natural resources, a quota may limit the amount of extraction (e.g. tonnes of coal or barrels of oil) allowed per year

    • For example, a government might set a quota of 200,000 tonnes per year on timber extraction to prevent deforestation

Evaluating the use of quotas to solve market failure

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Protects scarce natural resources

    • Helps ensure long-term sustainability of resources like forests, fish stocks or minerals

  • Supports environmental goals

    • Reduces overexploitation and negative externalities such as pollution or habitat loss

  • Stabilises markets

    • By limiting supply, quotas can prevent oversupply and sharp price falls (especially in agriculture or energy)

  • Risk of illegal activity

    • Strict limits may encourage black markets or unregulated over-extraction

  • Can raise prices

    • Reduced supply may lead to higher prices for consumers, especially if demand is inelastic

  • Difficult to enforce

    • Especially in developing countries or remote areas, monitoring and enforcement can be costly or ineffective

Case Study

New Zealand’s Fishing Quotas and Natural Resource Management

Context
New Zealand has some of the richest fishing waters in the world. To prevent overfishing, the government introduced a Quota Management System (QMS) in 1986, placing annual limits on how much fish could be caught for each species.

It was designed to conserve stocks, protect biodiversity and ensure long-term industry sustainability

Man holding fish with New Zealand map, fishing boat on water, fish icon, and quotas chart.

Using quotas

  • The government set a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) based on scientific data

  • Each fishery was allocated a quota share, which limited how much they could catch

  • These quotas were also tradable, allowing fishers to buy or sell unused portions

  • This system made sure natural resources weren’t overexploited and encouraged more responsible fishing practices

The outcome

  • Some overfished species like hoki have since recovered to sustainable levels

  • The industry became more efficient, with fishers investing in better practices

  • Illegal fishing reduced due to improved monitoring and enforcement

Why It worked
By using quotas to directly control supply, the New Zealand government successfully protected fish stocks, reduced overfishing and balanced economic and environmental goals

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Steve Vorster

Author: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.