Opposition to the New Deal (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE History): Revision Note

Exam code: 0470 & 0977

James Ball

Written by: James Ball

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Summary

Although President Roosevelt had been elected on an enormous landslide, his New Deal was not popular with everybody. It came under fierce criticism from many different groups in American society. Some argued it went too far and interfered with business and the American way of life. Others argued it did not go far enough and that the wealth of the super-rich should be confiscated. The Supreme Court even ruled that some aspects of the New Deal were unconstitutional.

Republican opposition to the New Deal

  • The New Deal went against everything that the supporters of the Republican Party believe in:

    • Republicans believe in a “small government” that stays out of people’s lives and leaves them to succeed — or fail — on their own

    • Republicans believed that the New Deal would make Americans lazy and cause them to wait for government “handouts”

    • Republicans also believed that Roosevelt had overreached his powers and was becoming too powerful

Wealthy opponents to the New Deal

  • The New Deal was expensive

  • To help pay for it, Roosevelt increased the amount of tax that wealthy people paid

    • Wealthy people deeply resented their money being used to plant trees or being given to homeless people

Business opponents to the New Deal

  • Many business leaders were supporters of the Republican Party and did not want the government to interfere in their lives or the way they ran their companies

    • The National Recovery Administration (NRA) forced business leaders to:

      • Improve working conditions

      • Pay a minimum wage 

      • Set limits on the number of hours a person could work

    • Business leaders believed this impacted how much money they could make and how competitive they could be

Radical opposition to the New Deal

  • Roosevelt also faced criticism from people at the other end of the political spectrum from the Republicans

  • Huey Long argued that every penny a person owned over $5 million should be confiscated by the government

    • The money should then be distributed amongst the American people

    • Long believed this would get the government enough money to enable it to give every family in America a house, a radio and a car

Man in a suit making a speech with expressive hand gestures, appearing engaged and energetic, set against a blurred dark background.
Senator Huey Long of Louisiana was a radical who argued that the reforms of the New Deal did not go far enough

The reaction of the US Supreme Court

  • The Supreme Court ruled that Roosevelt had broken the rules over how much power a president has

  • It ruled that: 

    • The NRA had tried to set prices and wages that only Congress, not the president, could do

    • The Agricultural Adjustment Association (AAA) had paid farmers to not grow food, which the Supreme Court ruled was the role of the state governments — not the president

Worked Example

Describe the reasons why there was opposition to the New Deal

[4 marks]

Answer:

One reason why there was opposition to the New Deal was that most Republicans believed in a small government that stayed out of people’s lives. The New Deal meant that the government had become more involved in the American people’s lives than ever before.

Another reason for the opposition to the New Deal was that some people did not believe it went far enough in correcting the problems in American society. Radicals such as Huey Long argued that the extreme wealth of the super-rich should be taken from them by the government and shared amongst the American people. Under Long’s plans, nobody could own more than $5 million.

Examiner Tips and Tricks

When answering the 6 mark “Why…?” question, make sure you use the PEEL format.

  • P — Point 

  • E — Evidence 

  • E — Explain 

  • L — Link your explanation back to the question

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

James Ball

Author: James Ball

Expertise: Content Creator

After a career in journalism James decided to switch to education to share his love of studying the past. He has over two decades of experience in the classroom where he successfully led both history and humanities departments. James is also a published author and now works full-time as a writer of history content and textbooks.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.