Religious Attitudes on End of Life (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Religious Studies): Revision Note
Exam code: C120
Christian attitudes to euthanasia
There is no single Christian teaching on euthanasia
Different denominations take different views, but most agree that:
Life is precious and must be treated with respect
Life is a sacred gift from God
Only God has the authority to end it
The sanctity of life and the Bible
The Bible teaches that humans are made in God’s image
“So God created mankind in his own image” (Genesis 1:27)
This means every person has dignity and worth, and life should be valued and protected
It also means that all Christians believe in the sanctity of life: all human life is sacred because it comes from God
The Ten Commandments say:
“You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13)
Many Christians believe euthanasia breaks this commandment
The Book of Job reminds believers that life and death are part of God’s plan:
“The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away; may the name of the Lord be praised” (Job 1:21)
Christians believe God knows and cares for each person:
“Even the hairs of your head have all been counted” (Luke 12:7)
Many Christians see the final stage of life as a spiritual time to prepare for death and draw closer to God
Because of these beliefs, most Christians reject euthanasia, trusting God to decide when life should end
Roman Catholic and Orthodox views
The Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches teach that euthanasia is always wrong because it deliberately ends an innocent human life
The Catholic Declaration on Euthanasia states:
“Nothing and no one can in any way permit the killing of an innocent human being … one who is suffering from an incurable disease, or a person who is dying”
The Catechism of the Catholic Church says:
“Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable”
Pope John Paul II wrote in Evangelium Vitae (1995):
“I confirm that euthanasia is a grave violation of the law of God, since it is the deliberate and morally unacceptable killing of a human person”
Catholics believe ending life early interferes with God’s plan
Life must be respected and protected, not shortened
Suffering can have spiritual value, helping people grow closer to God and develop compassion for others
They follow the principle of double effect: methods for easing suffering — even if they may shorten life — are acceptable, provided the intention is not to kill
Catholics support palliative care, which relieves pain without intending death
The Church strongly supports hospice care, helping people die with dignity rather than ending life early
“We should concern ourselves with the quality of life as well as its length” (Dame Cicely Saunders)
Anglican and Protestant views
The Church of England teaches that life is sacred but recognises that moral decisions can be complex
It generally opposes euthanasia. However, there may be rare cases where ending life could be seen as the “lesser of two evils”
Some Anglicans and Protestants take a situation ethics approach, deciding what is most loving in each case
If a person is suffering terribly and wishes to die, helping them could be viewed as an act of compassion
Others believe that love means providing care, not ending life
The Presbyterian Church teaches that Christians should focus on caring for the dying rather than ending life
“We believe Christians should urge government and society to adopt the other choices that are available for the alleviation of pain and suffering”
Liberal and Evangelical views
Evangelical Christians often take an absolutist view, believing that all forms of euthanasia are wrong because the Bible is the literal word of God
They see euthanasia as a breach of God’s commandments and the sanctity of life
Liberal Christians may take a relativist or compassionate approach
They might agree that turning off life support is acceptable if doctors are certain the person has experienced brain death
They may also accept withholding treatment that only prolongs suffering, following Jesus’s teaching to love others
However, they would still oppose deliberate killing or involuntary euthanasia
Alternatives to euthanasia: Hospices and palliative care
Many Christian churches promote hospice care as an alternative to euthanasia
Hospices provide medical, emotional and spiritual care for terminally ill people and their families
They help patients die with dignity, surrounded by love and care, while managing pain through palliative care
They also support families emotionally and spiritually during and after a loved one’s death
The first modern hospice was Saint Christopher’s Hospice, founded by Dame Cicely Saunders in 1967 in London
Saunders was inspired by her Christian faith
She aimed to relieve suffering and uphold the sanctity of life
Muslim attitudes to euthanasia
Most Muslims believe that euthanasia is always wrong (haram) because it goes against the sanctity of life
Life is a sacred gift from Allah, and only Allah has the right to give life and to take it away
“It is He [Allah] who gives death and life” (Qur’an 53:44)
Ending life deliberately through euthanasia is seen as a rejection of Allah’s gift
The sanctity of life
Muslims believe that all life has been created by Allah and has a purpose
Each person’s life follows a plan set by Allah, and no one should interfere with that plan
“And no person can ever die except by Allah’s leave and at an appointed term” (Qur’an 3:145)
Islam teaches that all life should be valued equally, whether healthy, disabled, young or old
It considers euthanasia as interfering with Allah’s will and plan
Euthanasia also prevents a person from completing the test of life that Allah has given them, which may affect what happens at their judgment and in the afterlife
Muslims believe that suffering can have spiritual value and is part of the test of life
“God does not burden any soul with more than it can bear” (Qur’an 2:286)
Those who remain patient and faithful during illness may receive great reward in the afterlife
Families who support and care for a loved one through illness are also carrying out an important religious duty
Although Islam teaches compassion, deliberately ending life to end pain is never seen as acceptable
Even when the body is weak, the soul remains pure and valuable
What matters most to Allah is the soul’s condition, not physical health
Muslims show compassion by providing medical treatment, emotional support and prayer, not by taking life away
Medical decisions and end-of-life care
Islam recognises that there are times when medical treatment cannot restore life
In these cases, Muslim scholars say it is acceptable to stop treatment that only delays death
This is not euthanasia, as it allows the natural process of dying to take place
The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics supports this view
“If it is scientifically certain that life cannot be restored, then it is futile to keep the patient in a vegetative state by heroic means”
Turning off a life support machine when recovery is impossible may therefore be permitted
Some scholars also allow a do not resuscitate (DNR) order when further treatment would only prolong suffering
However, deliberately causing death through medication or other active measures is strictly forbidden
Hospices and palliative care are encouraged as compassionate alternatives, helping patients manage pain and maintain dignity without ending life early
Humanist attitudes to euthanasia
Humanists do not believe that life is sacred because it was created by God, as they do not believe in God or an afterlife
Instead, they focus on the value and quality of life in the here and now
Humanists believe that each person has the right to make decisions about their own life, including how it should end
This is sometimes called self-determination
Therefore, many humanists support voluntary euthanasia and assisted dying
Individuals should have the right to choose how and when they die
Humanists uphold the right to life, but they believe that life should not be prolonged when it brings only pain or distress
They argue that if someone is suffering and there is no chance of recovery, choosing to die peacefully may be the most compassionate option
Many humanists also point out that people often end an animal’s suffering when it is in pain, so allowing a person to suffer without choice seems inconsistent or cruel
They see being able to die with dignity as a fundamental human right, and they believe that good end-of-life care should include the option of assisted dying for those who want it
Rather than focusing on the sanctity of life, humanists emphasise quality of life
They believe that when quality of life is lost beyond recovery, an individual should have the choice to end life on their own terms
This should only apply when the person is mentally capable of making that decision and has not been pressured by others
Humanists UK and other organisations, such as Dignity in Dying, have campaigned to legalise assisted dying and voluntary euthanasia in the UK
The organisations argue that:
People who are terminally ill and mentally competent should have the legal right to choose assisted dying
Suffering should not be prolonged when death is inevitable
Assisted dying should be strictly controlled and only carried out at the person’s own request
Dignity in Dying calls for the law to be limited to terminally ill adults who are mentally competent, to prevent abuse or pressure
This approach is designed to give people a choice while protecting the vulnerable
Worked Example
What is meant by “sanctity of life”?
[2 marks]
Answer:
The sanctity of life principle is the belief that all life is sacred because it is given by God, so only God has the authority to take it away.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Remember that the idea of euthanasia links back to sanctity of life teachings from the previous page on abortion. Some of the Christian and Muslim teachings about sanctity of life appear again on this page.
Learning these key teachings will also help you with other topics in this section, such as abortion.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?