Marxism (AQA AS Sociology): Revision Note
Marxism
Marxism is a conflict theory developed by Karl Marx
It focuses on the economic structure of society, particularly in capitalist systems, which Marxists see as unequal and exploitative
Unlike consensus theories (e.g., Functionalism), Marxism argues that society is held together not by shared values, but by conflict between social classes over wealth, power, and resources
Social classes under capitalism
Marx saw capitalism as based on a two-class system:
The bourgeoisie
These are the ruling class, who own the means of production, i.e., land, factories, and raw materials
They control wealth, decision-making, and institutions
The proletariat
The working class, who own nothing but their labour
They sell their labour to the bourgeoisie in exchange for a wage
According to Marx, this relationship is unequal and exploitative
This is because the wages paid to workers are less than the value of what they produce
The difference becomes profit for the bourgeoisie
This creates class conflict because:
workers want higher wages and better conditions
employers want more profit, which often means keeping wages low
Marx’s base-superstructure model
Marx argued that the economic system (the base or infrastructure) shapes all other non-economic parts of society (the superstructure), such as education, media, law, religion and ideology
These institutions help maintain and justify the economic system, creating a society that works in the interests of the ruling class
Classical Marxism sees this relationship as largely one-way: the base determines the superstructure
False consciousness & alienation
The ruling class controls ideology via institutions like education, religion, and media
This creates false consciousness, where workers believe inequality is normal or deserved
Workers are alienated because:
They have no control over the production process
Work is repetitive, meaningless, and for profit—not fulfilment
Alienation separates workers from their humanity and each other
Social change and revolution
Marx believed that the class struggle would eventually lead to social change
Wages are suppressed, and working conditions worsen
Eventually the working class becomes more aware of their shared oppression (developing class consciousness)
They will unite and challenge the capitalist system
This would lead to a revolution where the proletariat overthrows the bourgeoisie
The result would be communism: a classless and stateless society in which the means of production and wealth are owned collectively and exploitation is abolished
Evaluation of Marxism
Strengths
Provides a basis for social change
Marxist theory doesn't just describe inequality—it seeks to challenge and change it
By exposing exploitation and class conflict, it has inspired social movements and policies aimed at promoting greater equality
Criticisms
Economic determinism
Marx’s theory places too much emphasis on the economy as the key force shaping society
The base-superstructure model overstates the role of the economy in shaping the superstructure (e.g., law, media, education)
Structuralist Marxists like Althusser argue that the superstructure can also influence the base (a more two-way or relative autonomy view)
Overlooks other inequalities
Marx focused almost entirely on class, neglecting other important sources of inequality
Feminists argue he failed to address patriarchy and the oppression of women
Critics also highlight that racial and ethnic inequalities are overlooked in classical Marxist theory
Failed predictions
Marx predicted revolution in advanced capitalist countries, but this has not occurred
Countries like the UK and USA remain capitalist with no major working-class uprising
Capitalism has proven more adaptable than Marx expected
Underestimates reform and mobility
Modern societies have introduced reforms that reduce inequality
State welfare, minimum wage laws, and educational opportunities have improved life for many
This challenges the idea that all workers are uniformly exploited or remain powerless
Narrow view of power
Sociologists like Max Weber argue that status and power (e.g., lifestyle, education, prestige) are just as important as class in shaping inequality
Marxism is seen as too one-dimensional, focusing only on economic class
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?