RUAE Skills: Evaluation (SQA National 5 English): Revision Note
Exam code: X824 75
Evaluation requires you to move beyond understanding and analysis to make a justified, well-reasoned judgement. Examiners want to see whether you can weigh up ideas, assess the reliability or effectiveness of a text, and explain your decision clearly.
Strong evaluation shows awareness of bias, purpose and audience, and uses evidence to support balanced reasoning. It is not enough to point out strengths or weaknesses: you must comment on why they matter and how they influence the overall effectiveness of the text.
Making a personal judgement
To evaluate well, you must form a clear, defensible opinion based on the writer’s ideas, evidence and techniques. Your personal judgement should be rooted in the passage, not your own external knowledge.
How to form a strong judgement
Identify the focus of the question
Ask yourself: what exactly are you being asked to evaluate?Consider the writer’s methods
Think about:how convincing the evidence is
the clarity of the reasoning
the tone and style
the organisation of ideas
Acknowledge limitations
Strong answers recognise where the text is less successful or where an argument is underdeveloped. Is there a counter-argument they haven’t considered?Reach a clear conclusion
State your judgement confidently and summarise the key reasons for it.
Supporting your judgement with relevant evidence and reasoning
To achieve top marks, you must not only select the best details, but also explain their relevance. The examiner is looking for reasoning that links evidence to your final conclusion.
Key principles when selecting evidence
Be selective: choose only the points that genuinely strengthen your judgement
Be contextual: show how the evidence functions within the passage
Be reasoned: explain the significance of each point, not just what it shows
Be balanced when required: show that you have considered more than one side
Developing your reasoning
When evaluating a text, ask yourself:
How does this detail increase or reduce the text’s effectiveness?
Does the writer support their claims logically?
Is the language appropriate for the audience and purpose?
For a really effective evaluation, you need to move from what a particular language feature suggests, to why it supports your judgement:
Evidence | What it suggests | Why it supports your judgement |
|---|---|---|
use of statistics | factual grounding | strengthens reliability and credibility |
emotive language | emotional appeal | enhances persuasion but may reduce objectivity |
Linking evidence directly to your conclusion shows clarity of thought and strong evaluative control.
Assessing a writer’s purpose, bias, and objectivity
Understanding a writer’s perspective is central to effective evaluation. Writers may present information fairly, or they may select details that support a particular agenda. Your job is to judge how far this affects the text’s reliability or success.
How to assess purpose
Identify whether the writer aims to inform, persuade, entertain or argue
Consider whether the chosen techniques (for example, rhetorical questions or direct address) match this purpose effectively
How to assess bias
Look for selective evidence, one-sided arguments, exaggerated language or emotive appeals
Ask whether the writer acknowledges alternative viewpoints or contradicting evidence
How to assess objectivity
A text is more objective when it presents balanced information, uses neutral tone and offers credible evidence
Consider whether subjective opinions are presented as facts:
For example, some newspaper articles called columns often present opinions as facts in order to persuade a reader
Questions to ask yourself when evaluating a text
Question | What it reveals |
|---|---|
Is the writer fair? | The extent of balance and acknowledgement of other views |
Is the evidence strong? | Reliability and credibility |
Is the tone appropriate? | Whether style enhances or undermines purpose |
Evaluating purpose and bias helps you reach a nuanced, well-supported judgement.
Evaluating overall impact and techniques
Your final step is to judge how successfully the writer achieves their overall aim. This means considering the combined effect of language, structure, evidence and tone. A text might be persuasive because its reasoning is clear, or ineffective because its tone is exaggerated or its structure confused.
What to consider
Language choices: Do they enhance clarity, create impact, or distort meaning?
Structural organisation: Does the order of ideas strengthen or weaken the argument?
Use of evidence: Is it relevant, accurate and convincing?
Tone and register: Are they appropriate for the audience and purpose?
Making your final evaluation
Summarise the writer’s main strengths
Acknowledge any weaknesses or limitations
State a clear, final judgement, based on the focus of the evaluation from the question
Learn more
Discover more SQA National 5 English RUAE exam tips in our expert revision notes:
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?