RUAE Skills: Evaluation (SQA National 5 English): Revision Note

Exam code: X824 75

Nick Redgrove

Written by: Nick Redgrove

Reviewed by: Deb Orrock

Updated on

Evaluation requires you to move beyond understanding and analysis to make a justified, well-reasoned judgement. Examiners want to see whether you can weigh up ideas, assess the reliability or effectiveness of a text, and explain your decision clearly. 

Strong evaluation shows awareness of bias, purpose and audience, and uses evidence to support balanced reasoning. It is not enough to point out strengths or weaknesses: you must comment on why they matter and how they influence the overall effectiveness of the text.

Making a personal judgement

To evaluate well, you must form a clear, defensible opinion based on the writer’s ideas, evidence and techniques. Your personal judgement should be rooted in the passage, not your own external knowledge.

How to form a strong judgement

  1. Identify the focus of the question
    Ask yourself: what exactly are you being asked to evaluate?

  2. Consider the writer’s methods
    Think about:

    • how convincing the evidence is

    • the clarity of the reasoning

    • the tone and style

    • the organisation of ideas

  3. Acknowledge limitations
    Strong answers recognise where the text is less successful or where an argument is underdeveloped. Is there a counter-argument they haven’t considered?

  4. Reach a clear conclusion
    State your judgement confidently and summarise the key reasons for it.

Supporting your judgement with relevant evidence and reasoning

To achieve top marks, you must not only select the best details, but also explain their relevance. The examiner is looking for reasoning that links evidence to your final conclusion.

Key principles when selecting evidence

  • Be selective: choose only the points that genuinely strengthen your judgement

  • Be contextual: show how the evidence functions within the passage

  • Be reasoned: explain the significance of each point, not just what it shows

  • Be balanced when required: show that you have considered more than one side

Developing your reasoning

When evaluating a text, ask yourself:

  • How does this detail increase or reduce the text’s effectiveness?

  • Does the writer support their claims logically?

  • Is the language appropriate for the audience and purpose?

For a really effective evaluation, you need to move from what a particular language feature suggests, to why it supports your judgement:

Evidence

What it suggests

Why it supports your judgement

use of statistics

factual grounding

strengthens reliability and credibility

emotive language

emotional appeal

enhances persuasion but may reduce objectivity

Linking evidence directly to your conclusion shows clarity of thought and strong evaluative control.

Assessing a writer’s purpose, bias, and objectivity

Understanding a writer’s perspective is central to effective evaluation. Writers may present information fairly, or they may select details that support a particular agenda. Your job is to judge how far this affects the text’s reliability or success.

How to assess purpose

  • Identify whether the writer aims to inform, persuade, entertain or argue

  • Consider whether the chosen techniques (for example, rhetorical questions or direct address) match this purpose effectively

How to assess bias

  • Look for selective evidence, one-sided arguments, exaggerated language or emotive appeals

  • Ask whether the writer acknowledges alternative viewpoints or contradicting evidence

How to assess objectivity

  • A text is more objective when it presents balanced information, uses neutral tone and offers credible evidence

  • Consider whether subjective opinions are presented as facts:

    • For example, some newspaper articles called columns often present opinions as facts in order to persuade a reader

Questions to ask yourself when evaluating a text

Question

What it reveals

Is the writer fair?

The extent of balance and acknowledgement of other views

Is the evidence strong?

Reliability and credibility

Is the tone appropriate?

Whether style enhances or undermines purpose

Evaluating purpose and bias helps you reach a nuanced, well-supported judgement.

Evaluating overall impact and techniques

Your final step is to judge how successfully the writer achieves their overall aim. This means considering the combined effect of language, structure, evidence and tone. A text might be persuasive because its reasoning is clear, or ineffective because its tone is exaggerated or its structure confused.

What to consider

  • Language choices: Do they enhance clarity, create impact, or distort meaning?

  • Structural organisation: Does the order of ideas strengthen or weaken the argument?

  • Use of evidence: Is it relevant, accurate and convincing?

  • Tone and register: Are they appropriate for the audience and purpose?

Making your final evaluation

  1. Summarise the writer’s main strengths

  2. Acknowledge any weaknesses or limitations

  3. State a clear, final judgement, based on the focus of the evaluation from the question

Learn more

Discover more SQA National 5 English RUAE exam tips in our expert revision notes: 

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.

Deb Orrock

Reviewer: Deb Orrock

Expertise: English Content Creator

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.