Paper 1 Topics: The Environment (Cambridge (CIE) AS English General Paper): Revision Note
Exam code: 8021
Paper 1 essay summary
Paper 1 of the CIE AS English General Paper is the essay component
You will select one question from a list of ten options to write an essay of approximately 600-700 words
The questions concern contemporary issues
Here, we will focus on the theme of the environment, which falls into the topic area of science, environmental issues, technology and mathematics. The theme can include:
Climate change and environmental concerns
Natural disasters
Rural and urban concerns
Environmental impacts of human activity
These questions are designed to promote argument and evaluation rather than mere description.
Why the environment matters in Paper 1
Many General Paper science and technology questions ask you to analyse, evaluate and discuss contemporary issues, ethics and impacts related to these fields.
The exam is not testing your specialist knowledge, but rather your ability to think critically, write clearly and use examples effectively, which are all part of the Assessment Objectives.
To achieve a Level 5 essay, you will need to:
Select and apply relevant information and examples (AO1)
Analyse and evaluate arguments from more than one perspective (AO2)
Communicate fluently and accurately in a formal style (AO3)
Remember, your essay on any topic is rewarded for balanced thinking. Avoid one-sided answers, as examiners look for essays that weigh different points of view before drawing a conclusion.
Paper 1 exam-style essay questions on the environment
1. Natural disasters
To what extent should more be done to prepare for possible natural disasters in your country?
To answer this question, you can draw heavily on the information contained in the revision notes indicated below on natural hazards, mitigation, and planning.
Arguments supporting increased preparation could emphasise that investing in disaster risk reduction has the potential to save many lives. Disaster risk reduction also helps to stabilise the economic development of a country. Investing more in prevention reduces the eventual need for emergency funding, and knowing that a country is investing supports the well-being of its citizens. Specific preparatory measures include earthquake-resistant building codes, land use planning to situate essential services away from high-risk areas, regular earthquake drills, and the use of satellite technology in weather forecasting and disaster response.
Counter-arguments against increasing immediate preparation could argue that it is difficult and costly to prepare for unpredictable events. The benefits of some preventative actions are difficult to measure. The return on investment for preventative actions is not usually immediate or certain. Additionally, national budgets need to be prioritised for more immediate and pressing issues.
You can read more about this topic in the following revision notes:
2. Human impact on the environment
People should reduce the amount of meat they eat to protect the environment. Discuss.
To answer this question, you can draw heavily on the information contained in the revision notes indicated below on diet, agriculture, and climate change.
Arguments supporting the reduction of meat consumption could highlight that meat production typically requires more resources, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions. It contributes significantly to deforestation and pollution compared to vegetarian alternatives, and the meat industry uses a disproportionate amount of the world's fresh water supply. Some scientists believe eating less meat is the most effective way for lowering carbon footprint. Furthermore, livestock agriculture requires land conversion, which reduces the biosphere's capacity to sequester carbon dioxide.
Counter-arguments addressing the difficulties of this change could focus on the economic and social fallout. Reducing meat consumption directly affects the prosperity of meat producers and their communities. In agriculture, changing crops or livestock to suit new climatic conditions may be required, and increasing food insecurity might lead countries to look for quick fixes. There is a necessity to rely on existing methods of carbon removal like photosynthesis (by planting trees), rather than placing the entire burden on individual consumption habits.
You can read more about this topic in the following revision notes:
3. Fragile environments
To what extent has deforestation and land conversion irreversibly degraded the Earth's most fragile environments?
To answer this question, you can draw heavily on the information contained in the revision notes indicated below on the impacts and responses to deforestation and fragile environments.
Arguments supporting the view of irreversible degradation include evidence that deforestation reduces interception and infiltration, increasing soil erosion. This process leads to the loss of carbon storage in soil and biomass and reduces carbon dioxide intake during photosynthesis. Deforestation also leads to local climate changes, such as increased temperature and reduced precipitation, and monocultures reduce biodiversity.
In arid and semi-arid environments, shallow, infertile soils make recovery difficult. Ocean acidification, exacerbated by increasing CO2 uptake, increases the risk of permanent damage to marine ecosystems.
Counter-arguments presenting a case for reversibility could mention that afforestation and reforestation are beneficial for carbon dioxide sequestration. Successful long-term reduction of forest loss requires protective legislation and community involvement. Examples such as Brazil and the USA having large National Parks and Forest Reserves demonstrate conservation efforts. Strategies like agroforestry combine agriculture with forestry to reduce soil erosion, increase infiltration, and add nutrients to the soil. Furthermore, the Environmental Kuznets curve suggests that communities may reach a point where exploitation shifts toward protection.
You can read more about this topic in the following revision notes:
4. Water
Water is becoming a major reason for conflict between nations. Discuss.
To answer this question, you can draw heavily on the information contained in the revision notes indicated below on environmental concerns, resource security, and social/political issues.
Arguments supporting the claim of water as a major conflict reason include that threats to the supply of water for drinking and agriculture are caused by factors like overpopulation or drought. Actions taken by one nation can severely threaten the supply and distribution of water to neighbouring nations. Furthermore, rising sea levels caused by climate change threaten low-lying countries, creating environmental pressures that fuel disputes. The refusal of wealthier countries to act to alleviate environmental impacts felt by poorer nations creates geopolitical tensions.
Counter-arguments minimising water's direct role in conflict suggest that access to fresh, clean water is considered a human right. Conflicts may often be rooted in other geopolitical power struggles, such as the role of oceans and strategic ports in trade. Mitigation and adaptation strategies, if successful, could reduce tensions; these include water conservation and management, improving flood defences, and desalination to increase water supply. Solutions to climate change focus on international cooperation and agreements such as the Paris Agreement.
You can read more about this topic in the following revision notes:
For an example of a full, top-scoring model answer for this topic, please see our Model Answer on The Environment.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?