Voting Systems (Edexcel GCSE Citizenship Studies): Revision Note

Exam code: 1CS0

Michael Mitchell

Written by: Michael Mitchell

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

First-past-the-post

  • First Past the Post (FPTP) is the voting system used in UK general elections and many local elections

  • Each voter chooses one candidate by placing a cross (X) next to their name on a secret ballot paper, which is placed into a sealed ballot box at a polling station (or submitted by post)

An example ballot paper

Ballot paper for Anytown Parliamentary election, listing six candidates from different parties, each with a checkbox for voting.

How First Past the Post works

  • In a general election, each area, known as a constituency, elects one Member of Parliament (MP)

  • The candidate who receives the most votes wins the seat

    • They do not need a majority (over 50%) of the votes

  • In local elections, the process is similar

    • Electors select their chosen candidate to represent a specific ward

  • All other votes are not counted towards representation

  • This system is described as winner takes all

Evaluation of First Past the Post

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • FPTP is easy to understand

    • Voters simply choose one candidate

  • Voting is quick and simple

  • The counting process is straightforward

  • Results are declared quickly, often on the same night

  • FPTP usually produces a clear winner

    • This often leads to strong and stable governments

  • It creates a strong link between voters and their local MP

    • Each constituency elects one MP, so voters know exactly who represents them and who to contact if they have a problem or concern

    • This can improve accountability, because voters can clearly reward or punish their MP at the next election

  • Winning candidates often receive less than 50% of the vote

    • This means many voters are not represented by their MP

  • Many votes are described as wasted votes

    • These are votes that do not help elect a candidate

    • Voters in safe seats may feel their vote does not matter

  • Political parties may focus only on marginal seats

    • Safe seats are often ignored during campaigns

  • The national result may not reflect how people voted overall

    • For example, a party can win a general election without winning the most votes nationwide

  • Smaller parties, such as The Green Party, may gain millions of votes but very few MPs

Why FPTP is controversial

  • Supporters argue it creates stable governments

  • Critics argue it is unfair and unrepresentative

  • This debate has led to calls for electoral reform, such as proportional representation

Proportional representation

  • Proportional voting systems help ensure that the number of seats a party or group wins closely matches the share of votes they receive

  • Proportional systems aim to make election results fairer and more representative

    • Fewer votes are wasted and smaller parties have a better chance of gaining representation

Proportional voting systems used in the UK

Flowchart showing three election systems: Supplementary Vote, Single Transferable Vote, and Additional Member System, connected with lines.

Supplementary Vote (SV)

  • Supplementary Vote has been used for directly elected mayors and Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs) in England

How the system works

  • Voters choose a first-choice and a second-choice candidate

    • If one candidate receives more than 50% of first-choice votes, they win outright

    • If no candidate reaches 50%, all but the top two candidates are eliminated

    • The second-choice votes of eliminated candidates are then transferred if they chose one of the remaining two

    • The candidate with the most votes after transfers wins

Key points

  • SV encourages candidates to appeal to a broader range of voters

  • It reduces the chance of a winner being elected on a very small share of the vote

Single Transferable Vote (STV)

  • The Single Transferable Vote is used for elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly

  • It is also used in local elections in Northern Ireland and Scotland

How the system works

  • Voters rank candidates in order of preference (1, 2, 3, etc.)

  • A quota of votes is needed to be elected

    • If a candidate receives more votes than the quota, their surplus votes are transferred to voters’ next choices

    • If no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are transferred

    • This process continues until all seats are filled

Key points

  • STV produces very proportional results

  • Voters have more choice, including between candidates from the same party

  • Elections using STV often result in coalition or power-sharing governments, especially in Northern Ireland

Additional Member System (AMS)

  • The Additional Member System is used to elect members to:

    • The Scottish Parliament

    • The Welsh Parliament (Senedd)

    • The London Assembly

How the system works

  • Voters are given two ballot papers:

    • One to elect a constituency representative using First Past the Post (FPTP)

    • One to vote for a party list in a wider region

  • Seats from the party list are allocated to correct imbalances created by FPTP

    • For example, if a party deserves 15 seats overall based on its list vote but has already won 5 constituency seats, it receives 10 additional seats from its list

Key points

  • AMS is a mixed system, combining FPTP and proportional representation

  • It keeps a local representative while making results fairer overall

  • Smaller parties gain better representation than under FPTP alone

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • To gain marks on elections questions, always link the voting system to its outcome

    • For example, explain how FPTP can create strong governments but wasted votes, or how proportional systems improve fairness but often lead to coalitions

  • Evaluating impact, not just describing the system, is what examiners look for

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Michael Mitchell

Author: Michael Mitchell

Expertise: Content Writer

Michael Mitchell is a pioneer of Citizenship education and a former Chief Examiner and Chief Moderator across all qualification levels. Michael's aim is to enable students to participate and become active citizens and not just passive members of society. He designed national specifications and, later, trained the next generation of teachers as the PGCE Subject Leader at the University of Plymouth, where he also ran a national Master's-level CPD program.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.