Rights, Duties & Values: Current Debates (Edexcel GCSE Citizenship Studies): Revision Note

Exam code: 1CS0

Lisa Eades

Written by: Lisa Eades

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

Do we all have a right to privacy?

  • The right to privacy is the expectation that personal life, information and communications are protected

    • This includes home life, family relationships, medical information and online data

The right to privacy in the UK

  • Privacy is generally expected, but not absolute

    • Most people expect privacy in their home and personal communications

    • However, privacy can be limited in certain situations

  • Public interest can justify limits on privacy

    • Privacy may be reduced to protect others or society as a whole

    • For example, police may monitor suspects to prevent serious crime

  • Privacy differs between individuals

    • Public figures often have less privacy than private individuals

    • This is because their actions may affect the public

  • Technology has increased privacy concerns

    • Social media and smartphones collect large amounts of personal data

    • For example, apps tracking location raise questions about consent and surveillance

  • The media plays a key role in privacy debates

    • Journalists must balance informing the public with respecting private life

    • Publishing private details without strong justification can cause harm

Reasons we DO have a right to privacy

Reasons privacy can be limited

  • Privacy protects dignity and personal freedom

  • People need private space to live safely and independently

  • Personal data, such as medical records, should remain confidential

  • Protects individuals from harassment and media intrusion

  • Builds trust between citizens and institutions

  • Privacy may be restricted to prevent serious crime or terrorism

  • Police surveillance may be necessary for public safety

  • Public figures may be scrutinised due to their influence

  • The media may expose wrongdoing in the public interest

  • Technology and security measures increase monitoring

Does freedom of speech have limits?

  • Freedom of speech is the right to express opinions, ideas and beliefs without unfair punishment

    • This includes spoken words, writing, protest, art and online expression

  • It is a key democratic value

    • It allows debate, criticism of those in power and the sharing of different viewpoints

Freedom of speech in the UK

  • Freedom of speech is protected but not absolute

    • People are generally free to express views, including criticism of the government

    • However, speech can be limited where it causes harm to others

  • Harmful speech is restricted

    • Hate speech, threats and incitement to violence are not protected

    • For example, racist or religious hatred is illegal

  • Public order and safety can limit speech

    • Speech that risks serious disorder or violence may be restricted

    • For example, police may place conditions on protests to prevent disruption

  • The media has freedom but also responsibilities

    • Journalists can report on matters of public interest

    • They must avoid defamation and respect privacy

  • Online speech raises new challenges

    • Social media allows speech to spread quickly and widely

    • Platforms and laws aim to limit harmful or misleading content

Reasons freedom of speech SHOULD be protected

Reasons freedom of speech SHOULD have limits

  • Supports democracy and open debate

  • Allows criticism of government and those in power

  • Encourages diverse opinions and minority views

  • Helps expose wrongdoing and injustice

  • Promotes tolerance through discussion

  • Hate speech can harm individuals and communities

  • Speech can incite violence or disorder

  • Misinformation can cause public harm

  • Protects the rights and safety of others

  • Prevents abuse, harassment and intimidation

Case Study

Tommy Robinson and limits on freedom of speech

Man in blue blazer and light blue shirt touching his face, standing outdoors. Short hair, wearing wristbands and a button with a blurred background.
  • In 2018, Tommy Robinson filmed and live-streamed outside Leeds Crown Court

    • The trial involved grooming gang defendants and had reporting restrictions in place

    • The restrictions aimed to protect the fairness of the trial

      • Especially to prevent jurors being influenced by media coverage

  • Robinson claimed he was exercising freedom of speech and press freedom

    • He argued the public had a right to know about the case

  • Supporters said filming outside a court was a form of journalism

    • They believed restrictions limited free expression

Why freedom of speech was limited

  • Courts ruled the broadcast risked seriously prejudicing the trial

    • Jurors could have seen the video online

  • Protecting the right to a fair trial was prioritised

    • This is essential to justice and the rule of law

Outcome

  • Robinson was found in contempt of court

    • He received a prison sentence, later subject to appeal and retrial

  • Judges stressed the case was not about opinions, but about protecting justice

Freedoms and the terrorism threat

  • Terrorism involves the use of violence or threats to create fear and influence society or government

    • In the UK, terrorism is linked to threats from extremist groups and lone actors

  • Terrorism aims to damage democratic freedoms

    • By creating fear, it can change how people live and behave

How terrorism affects freedoms in the UK

  • Limits on freedom of movement

    • Police can stop and search individuals to prevent attacks

    • Increased security at airports, events and public spaces

      • For example, bag checks at concerts and transport hubs

  • Limits on privacy

    • Surveillance powers allow authorities to monitor suspected extremists

    • Online activity and communications may be monitored

      • Aimed at preventing attacks before they happen

  • Limits on freedom of speech

    • It is illegal to support or encourage terrorism

    • Online extremist content can be removed

      • Prevents radicalisation and recruitment

  • Limits on freedom of association

    • Terrorist organisations are banned in the UK

    • Joining or supporting them is a criminal offence

Why freedoms may be limited due to terrorism

Flowchart with three columns: Protect public safety, Prevent radicalisation, Support the rule of law. Each includes explanatory text below.

Concerns about limiting freedoms

  • Restrictions may affect innocent people

    • For example, stop and search can feel unfair or discriminatory

  • Surveillance raises privacy concerns

    • Some argue it goes too far

  • There is ongoing debate about balance

    • How much freedom should be limited to stay safe

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Lisa Eades

Author: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.