RUAE Skills: Analysing Language and Techniques (SQA National 5 English): Revision Note

Exam code: X824 75

Nick Redgrove

Written by: Nick Redgrove

Reviewed by: Deb Orrock

Updated on

Being able to explain how a writer’s choices create meaning is important in any English exam paper. Analysis goes beyond spotting a technique: you must show how the language works and why the writer has used it

The best analysis requires close attention to detail, a secure understanding of vocabulary, and the ability to link effects to purpose: you need to show the examiner that you can interpret not just what the writer says, but how they shape the reader’s response.

Analysing the writer’s language choices

When analysing, it helps to divide your thinking between why the writer has made a certain choice and how that choice creates its effect. Identifying a technique alone does not gain marks; you must interpret its impact.

Step-by-step approach to analysing a text

  1. Identify the question focus
    First, read the question and identify what you are being asked to analyse.

  2. Select your evidence carefully
    Choose the most relevant word or phrase rather than an entire sentence.

  3. Explain the connotations
    What ideas, emotions or associations does the word carry? How does this shape the reader’s understanding?

  4. Link to the writer’s purpose
    Is the writer trying to persuade? Create tension? Build sympathy? Show how the language helps achieve that aim.

A writer always has a purpose in mind when they write a text. Their purpose might be:

  • to create an atmosphere

  • to highlight contrast

  • to present a viewpoint

  • to influence the reader’s emotions or attitudes

Helpful two-part structure when analysing texts

  1. "The writer uses X (technique/word).

  2. This suggests/creates Y (effect), because…"

This approach keeps your analysis precise and purposeful.

Analysing word choice and imagery

Word choice and imagery often provide the strongest evidence for analysis questions. The examiner expects you to explore the associations behind a word or image, not simply restate it.

How to analyse word choice

  1. Select the one key word

  2. Identify its main connotations

  3. Explain how these connotations contribute to the writer’s overall meaning or tone

How to analyse imagery

When analysing imagery, you are required to explore the comparison being made by the author. A writer might be comparing something to something figurative, using techniques such as personification, metaphor or simile. It is your job to dig into these comparisons and explain why the writer is making them.

Use the “Just as… so…” method:

  • Just as the literal image creates a certain idea…

  • So the writer conveys a similar idea in the context of the passage

Examples of analysis of word choice and imagery

Technique

What to comment on

Example of analytical focus

Word choice

Connotations and tone

“‘brutal’ suggests harshness and violence, emphasising the difficulty of the experience.”

Simile

Comparison and effect

“Just as a ‘caged bird’ is restricted, so the writer suggests she feels trapped.”

Metaphor

Implied comparison

“Describing the crowd as a ‘sea’ conveys its overwhelming size and movement.”

Good analysis avoids description. Instead of “This makes the reader imagine…”, focus on why the writer chose that particular comparison.

Analysing structural techniques

Writers also shape meaning through structure: the order of ideas, the length and type of sentences, and the development of arguments or narratives. These choices influence pace, emphasis and tone.

Useful structural features to analyse

  • Sentence structure: short sentences to create tension or emphasis; longer, flowing ones to develop reflection or description

  • Ordering of ideas: whether the writer builds to a climax, contrasts viewpoints, or shifts from general to specific

  • Use of lists: can suggest abundance, chaos or emphasis

  • Paragraph development: each paragraph often shifts focus or tone

How to analyse structure

  1. Identify what the writer is doing (e.g., shifting from one setting to another, or from one perspective to another)

  2. Explain the effect on the reader or the meaning

  3. Link back to the passage’s overall purpose and the focus of the question

It’s a good idea to think about analysing structure in three parts:

Stage of analysis

Example sentence

  1. Identification

“The writer uses a short, abrupt sentence.”

  1. Effect

“This creates a moment of impact, emphasising the suddenness of the change.”

  1. Purpose

“This highlights the significance of the event in the narrative.”

Structural analysis is most successful when it comments on how ideas unfold rather than simply spotting features.

Explaining the effects of language

Good analysis answers the question “So what?” Every technique creates an effect, but you must show how that effect is achieved.

Key questions to ask when exploring the effects of language

  • What does this make the reader think or understand?

  • What emotion or atmosphere does it create?

  • How does it support the writer’s viewpoint or argument?

Typical effects to consider

Type of effect

What to look for

Emotional

fear, sympathy, humour, admiration

Atmospheric

tension, calmness, urgency

Persuasive

pressure, authority, credibility

Avoid generic phrases like “This draws the reader in”. Be specific: What about it draws the reader in? Why?

Precise explanations show you fully understand what the writer is trying to achieve.

Developing your explanations

The highest-mark answers show developed, well-reasoned explanations. This means moving from basic identification to insightful commentary.

Strategies for developing explanations

  1. Use multiple layers of detail
    Instead of stopping at one connotation, explore two or three related ideas.

  2. Connect ideas logically
    Show how the writer’s choice leads to a particular interpretation. Some great sentence structures to use are:

    • “This suggests… because…”

    • “This emphasises… by…”

    • “This reinforces… as…”

  3. Link language to wider meaning
    Demonstrate awareness of a text’s overall ideas or theme, a particular character’s attitude or the development of a writer’s argument.

  4. Consider alternatives
    Why this word and not another? What else could this particular choice of language suggest?

Example of developed analysis

Basic analysis

“The word ‘harsh’ shows it was unpleasant.”

Developed analysis

“The word ‘harsh’ suggests a severity and coldness that make the conditions seem not only unpleasant but actively punishing, reinforcing the writer’s sense of struggle.”

Developing your analysis shows a deeper level of understanding and secures higher marks.

Learn more

Discover more SQA National 5 English RUAE exam tips in our expert revision notes: 

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Nick Redgrove

Author: Nick Redgrove

Expertise: English Content Creator

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.

Deb Orrock

Reviewer: Deb Orrock

Expertise: English Content Creator

Deb is a graduate of Lancaster University and The University of Wolverhampton. After some time travelling and a successful career in the travel industry, she re-trained in education, specialising in literacy. She has over 16 years’ experience of working in education, teaching English Literature, English Language, Functional Skills English, ESOL and on Access to HE courses. She has also held curriculum and quality manager roles, and worked with organisations on embedding literacy and numeracy into vocational curriculums. She most recently managed a post-16 English curriculum as well as writing educational content and resources.