State Power & Contemporary Global Issues (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

Changing states, conflict and poverty

  • Conflict and poverty are interconnected global political challenges that threaten state sovereignty and security

    • Conflict can lead to poverty

    • Interstate or intrastate conflict can cause many negative situations that result in poverty, including

      • the destruction of infrastructure, supplies and business

      • the disruption of daily life and access to education or work 

      • shortages of daily necessities such as food, water or medicine 

    • Poverty can fuel conflict

      • Frustration can build in communities where daily life is a struggle due to poverty and often this results in violence 

      • With time, conflict and poverty can become part of a vicious cycle of violence and deprivation.

Changing relationships between states in addressing conflict and poverty 

  • Historically, the state was responsible for the poverty of its citizens

    • Over time the global community came together to see these problems as interconnected global political challenges

  • The UN and other IGOs and NGOs have made development (economic and other forms)  and the eradication of poverty a priority for two main reasons:

    1. To promote the importance that all people should live in dignity 

    2. To prevent conflict  

Changing states and human rights

  • The idea that all human beings deserve to live a life of dignity is not a new one

    • Widely accepted definitions of state sovereignty meant historically states could decide the rights awarded to their citizens 

  • In the 20th century with the formation of IGOs such as the United Nations and the establishment of NGOs such as Amnesty International, the ideal of universal rights challenged the idea that states should have the power to decide what rights are awarded to citizens

    • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was introduced by the United Nations in 1948

      • It signified a shift in thinking, as every member state of the UN eventually recognised this document and promised to uphold it

    • Subsequent UN Human rights laws and treaties have been signed and ratified by most states, demonstrating a shift in global norms toward human rights 

  • Although sovereignty continues to be an obstacle protecting and monitoring human rights continues to be a key issues amongst states in global politics

Changing states and the environment

  • The 20th century saw a growing acceptance that state sovereignty and borders had little relevance in terms of global environmental damage

  • A wider appreciation of the  tragedy of the commons has led to a cooperative approach by states toward finding solutions to multiple environmental concerns

International agreements and the environment 

Agreement 

Purpose 

Impact

Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), 1973

  • Restricts the buying and selling of over 35,000 products which come from endangered animals/plants

    • Ivory

    • Rhino products 

    • Tiger products 

    • Some orchids and types of wood

  • Almost all states support CITES 

  • It has been effective in reducing the decline of endangered species and fauna.

  • However, illegal trade continues to persist beyond the control of the state.

Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, 1989

  • Restricts the movement of hazardous materials which could endanger health of both people and flora and fauna

  • Almost all states support this convention

  • It has helped shape global norms regarding the international transportation of materials which threaten the environment

  • Less economically developed states struggle to enforce this convention, and illegal dumping of waste, particularly at sea, continues to be problematic

The Paris Agreement-United Nations Climate Fund, 2015

  • An agreement for states to take measures to reduce global warming to less than 2 degrees and, ideally 1.5 degrees

  • Some argue it has been effective at establishing a global framework and norms of state cooperation to address climate change. 

  • The core goal of reducing global temperatures has not been met

  • The interconnected and interdependent nature of conflict, poverty, human rights and the environment has made these issues of primary importance to the global community 

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.