Syllabus Edition
First teaching 2025
First exams 2027
Six Key Concepts in IB DP Psychology (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note
Overview of the six key concepts
IB DP Psychology is built around six key concepts that run throughout the entire course:
Bias
Causality
Change
Measurement
Perspective
Responsibility
These concepts appear across all content areas, which include:
biological approach
cognitive approach
sociocultural approach
These concepts also apply to all of the contexts, which include:
Health & wellbeing
Human development
Human relationships
Learning and cognition
Concepts help you to analyse, evaluate and connect psychological knowledge, rather than simply describe studies or theories
They are also Theory of Knowledge (TOK) concepts, meaning they link psychology to wider questions about how knowledge is produced, evaluated and applied across subjects
Understanding the key concepts supports critical thinking, allowing you to make balanced judgements about psychological research and theories by considering strengths, limitations and implications
How should concepts be applied?
When studying any psychology topic, you should ask the following questions:
How is psychological knowledge constructed here?
What assumptions underlie the research or theory?
What limitations affect the findings?
How does this connect to other theories, approaches or contexts?
There is no single correct way to apply concepts and they often overlap, e.g.
the same idea (e.g. reductionism) may relate to more than one concept
You do not need to use all six concepts in every response; typically 3–4 relevant concepts are sufficient
Concepts should be treated as tools for thinking, not as content to memorise
Bias
Bias refers to a limitation in objective thinking, where information is interpreted through a filter of experience, expectations or preferences
In psychology, bias can influence:
How research is designed and conducted
How data is interpreted
How theories are constructed
Everyday decision-making and judgement
Bias may be explicit or implicit, and psychologists attempt to reduce it through careful research design while recognising that complete objectivity is difficult
Relevant examples of bias
Researcher bias and participant bias, including demand characteristics and social desirability bias, where expectations or awareness of the study influence behaviour, data collection, or interpretation
Sampling bias and the role of sampling techniques, including how opportunity, self-selected, or restricted samples reduce representativeness and limit generalisability
Confirmation bias and publication bias, including the tendency to favour results that support existing theories and the greater likelihood of positive findings being published, which can distort the research evidence base
Gender bias and cultural bias, including ethnocentrism, where findings are based on one gender or culture and inappropriately generalised to others
Cognitive biases, including availability, anchoring, and representativeness heuristics, which influence perception, judgement, memory, and decision-making in participants, observers, and researchers
Determinism, including biological and environmental determinism, and how these perspectives may bias interpretations of behaviour by underestimating human agency and choice
Credibility and reflexivity, particularly in qualitative research, including researchers’ awareness of their own assumptions and the role of inter-rater reliability in reducing interpretive bias
Positivism and reductionism, contrasted with holistic approaches, including how epistemological positions may shape research focus, methods, and conclusions by oversimplifying complex psychological phenomena
Causality
Causality refers to establishing cause-and-effect relationships between variables
In psychology causality is difficult to establish because:
behaviour is often influenced by multiple interacting variables
relationships between variables may be indirect or bidirectional
correlation does not imply causation
Psychologists attempt to establish causality using controlled research methods, although ethical and practical constraints often limit the level of control
Relevant examples of causality
Correlation and causation, including the distinction between statistical association and true cause-and-effect relationships
Bidirectional ambiguity, including situations where it is unclear whether variable A causes variable B, variable B causes variable A, or both influence each other
Reductionist and complex explanations, including the extent to which causal accounts oversimplify behaviour or acknowledge interactions between biological, cognitive, and sociocultural factors
Internal and external validity, including whether a study’s design allows confident causal conclusions and whether those conclusions can be generalised beyond the research setting
Control of extraneous and confounding variables, including the use of standardisation, random allocation, and controlled procedures to strengthen causal inference
Placebos, double-blind procedures, and wait-list controls, including their role in reducing expectancy effects and alternative explanations in experimental research
Statistical significance and effect size, including the distinction between meaningful causal effects and findings that are statistically significant but limited in practical importance
Agency and motivation, including how human choice, intention, and meaning complicate simple cause-and-effect explanations
Change
Change refers to how behaviour develops, adapts or is altered over time
In psychology, change can be:
gradual, such as development and maturation
sudden, such as mood or behavioural changes
planned, such as therapy, education or health interventions
unplanned, such as illness or trauma
A key debate in psychology concerns the extent to which behaviour is shaped by free will (agency) versus determinism
Psychologists investigate how behaviour can be changed and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions at individual, community and global levels
Relevant examples of change
Development and maturation, including natural changes in behaviour, cognition, or emotion over time that may occur independently of specific interventions or experiences
Biological and environmental determinism, including how genetic, neurological, or environmental factors may constrain or facilitate the extent to which change is possible
Agency and motivation, including the role of individual choice, effort, and readiness to change, and how personal motivation influences the success of behavioural or psychological change
Barriers to change and resistance to change, including habits, social pressures, structural inequalities, stigma, or lack of resources that may prevent or slow change
Prevalence of behaviours, including changes in how common certain behaviours, attitudes, or conditions are over time within a population, often linked to social or cultural change
Intervention, prevention, and health promotion strategies, including attempts to bring about change at the individual, group, or population level through education, policy, or psychological intervention
Effectiveness of treatments, including whether observed changes are meaningful, sustained over time, and superior to no treatment or alternative approaches
Use of longitudinal and repeated-measures designs, including their role in tracking change over time and distinguishing short-term effects from lasting change
Measurement
Measurement refers to how psychologists observe, define and quantify behaviour
Human behaviour is often:
difficult to observe directly
context-dependent
influenced by interpretation
To measure behaviour effectively, psychologists must:
operationalise variables clearly
choose appropriate research methods
ensure reliability and validity
Measurement may involve a range of evidence types and often benefits from triangulation to increase credibility
Relevant examples of measurement
Choice of research method, including how experiments, interviews, surveys, observations, or case studies influence what can be measured and the type of data produced
Constructs and variables, including the distinction between abstract psychological constructs (e.g. self-esteem, stress) and the variables used to represent them in research
Operationalisation of variables, including how constructs are translated into measurable variables through tasks, scales, or indicators, and how this affects validity
Quantitative and qualitative data, including differences in numerical measurement versus descriptive data and how each contributes to understanding psychological phenomena
Self-reported, empirical, and anecdotal data, including strengths and limitations of relying on participants’ reports compared to observed or objectively recorded data
Direct and indirect measures, including whether behaviour or psychological processes are measured directly or inferred from indicators such as test performance or physiological responses
Brain imaging techniques (e.g. MRI, fMRI), including their use in measuring brain structure or activity and the assumptions involved in linking neural data to behaviour or cognition
Statistical significance and Type I / Type II errors, including the risk of false positives or false negatives when interpreting measured effects
Longitudinal and cross-sectional designs, including how repeated measurement over time compares with single-time-point measurement in capturing change
Prospective and retrospective approaches, including differences between measuring variables as events unfold versus relying on participants’ recall of past experiences
Perspective
A perspective refers to a particular way of understanding and explaining behaviour
IB DP Psychology uses three main perspectives:
biological
cognitive
sociocultural
Each perspective:
is based on different assumptions about behaviour
uses different research methods
offers different explanations of behaviour
No single perspective fully explains behaviour; a multi-perspective approach provides a more complete understanding
Relevant examples of perspective
Psychological theories and models, including how different theoretical frameworks (e.g. biological, cognitive, sociocultural) shape research questions, methods, and interpretations of behaviour
Reductionism and holism, including whether behaviour is explained by breaking it down into simpler components or by considering interactions between biological, cognitive, and sociocultural factors
Emic and etic approaches, including the use of culture-specific (emic) versus cross-cultural (etic) perspectives in understanding behaviour and experience
Deductive and inductive reasoning and data analysis, including theory-driven hypothesis testing versus data-driven theory building
Alternative explanations and interpretations, including the consideration of competing accounts for findings and the extent to which conclusions are tentative or open to revision
Cultural and Indigenous perspectives, including the recognition of diverse ways of knowing, valuing, and understanding psychological phenomena, and the importance of context and cultural meaning in interpretation
Responsibility
Responsibility refers to the ethical and social obligations of psychologists in their research and practice
Because psychologists work with humans (and sometimes animals), ethical standards are essential to:
protect participants
minimise harm
maximise benefits
Ethical considerations can influence research design, participant behaviour and the validity of findings
Psychologists are also responsible for how research is applied in society
Relevant examples of responsibility
Ethical standards in research, including adherence to professional guidelines that ensure respect, dignity, and protection for participants throughout the research process
Informed consent, including providing participants with sufficient information about the study’s purpose, procedures, and potential risks so that participation is voluntary and informed
Right to withdraw, including participants’ ability to leave the study at any time without penalty or negative consequences
Protection from harm, including minimising physical, psychological, and social risks, particularly when research involves sensitive topics or vulnerable groups
Use of deception and debriefing, including the ethical justification for deception and the responsibility to fully explain the true purpose of the study afterwards
Anonymity and confidentiality, including safeguarding participants’ identities and personal data to prevent embarrassment, distress, or social harm
Cost–benefit analysis, including weighing the potential benefits of the research against any risks or discomfort to participants
Use of animals and child participants, including additional ethical safeguards, minimising harm, and ensuring research is necessary and justified
Socially sensitive research, stigma, and advocacy, including researchers’ responsibility to avoid reinforcing stereotypes, to communicate findings carefully, and to advocate for positive social change where appropriate
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The best preparation for concept-based questions is to practise conceptual thinking. After studying each topic or research method, consider how it can be linked to different key concepts and how those concepts influence the interpretation of findings.
When using concepts in exam answers, make sure they are clearly applied to the study or context being discussed, rather than explained in isolation.
You may be asked to discuss any key concept in relation to any IB Psychology context. However, you will not be asked a question that focuses on a single narrow aspect of a concept (e.g. gender bias or barriers to change).
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?