Combatting Crime in Tudor Times (WJEC Eduqas GCSE History): Revision Note

Exam code: C100

Natasha Smith

Written by: Natasha Smith

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

How was crime tackled during Tudor times? - Summary 

During the Tudor period, many methods of combating crime from medieval times continued to be used. Local communities still played an important role in maintaining law and order, and traditional systems such as the hue and cry and posse comitatus were still used to catch criminals. However, there were also some important changes. The most significant was the growing role of the justices of the peace (JPs). These unpaid local landowners were responsible for enforcing laws, organising punishments, and keeping peace in their area. Without their work, maintaining law and order would have been almost impossible. Although policing was still based on local responsibility rather than a professional force, the Tudors relied heavily on JPs to control crime and ensure that the Tudor monarch's laws were enforced.

The Role & Effectiveness of Tudor Justices of the Peace

  • A justice of the peace was chosen from the landowners in the country 

    • They were voluntary positions, but they gained a lot of power in their local areas 

  • In the Tudor period, the justice of the peace was made responsible for 

    • All other local officials 

      • Including sheriffs and constables 

      • JPs appointed the chief constables in every hundred 

    • Maintaining law and order 

      • They acted as a magistrate 

      • They would try minor crimes, including theft, fighting, and drunkenness

      • Two or three JPs would meet at a petty session 

      • JPs met four times a year at the quarter sessions 

    • Enforcing over 300 laws, including: 

      • The 1601 Elizabethan Poor Law, including distributing the poor relief 

      • Create houses of correction 

      • Issue vagrants with licenses 

      • Regulate wages

    • Following orders given to them by the Privy Council 

      • Enforcing any laws passed by the Privy Council

      • In Wales, this also included laws passed by the Council in the Marches

How Effective Were Justices of the Peace?   

  • Overall, Justices of the peace were seen as effective in the Tudor period, as they were

    • Well respected locally 

      • Wealthy and influential, people tended to respect their decisions

    • Powerful

      • JPs were responsible for monitoring and upholding hundreds of laws 

    • Supported royal control 

      • JPs helped the monarch to extend their power in England and Wales 

      • Without them, Tudor monarchs would not have been able to maintain law and order or keep the peace 

  • However, JPs were sometimes seen as ineffective because they were

    • Voluntary positions 

      • As JPs were not paid, the quality of their work varied 

      • Some JPs became lazy or corrupt 

    • Limited 

      • They relied heavily on constables and watchmen who were often part-time and poorly trained 

      • In very remote areas, law enforcement was weak due to communications issues 

    • Politically bias 

      • As JPs were appointed locally, they might enforce laws unevenly, depending on their own interests or loyalty to the monarch 

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In Question 4, you may be asked to “Explain why new methods of combating crime were introduced.” During the Tudor period, many of these methods developed because of rising poverty and vagrancy. Governments saw unemployment and wandering beggars as threats to social order, so they passed laws to control them.

To achieve the higher levels in Question 4, don’t just describe the new laws; instead, you should explain why they were introduced. Always link your examples to wider problems such as poverty, unemployment, and fear of disorder.

The Role & Effectiveness of Other Parish Officers

Parish Constables & Night Watchmen 

  • The parish constable and night watchmen held similar positions, but in different areas 

    • A parish constable kept the peace in more rural settings 

    • Whereas a night watchman maintained law and order in more urban areas 

  • The parish constable was chosen from ordinary village or townspeople 

    • They were not paid and only served as a parish constable for a year 

  • The parish constable was responsible for 

    • Maintaining order 

      • Including breaking up fights and arresting suspected individuals 

      • Watching over their local area at night 

    • Enforcing the law 

      • Carrying out punishments, including whippings, and organising the stocks 

      • On vagrancy and other laws

    • Collecting fines 

    • Maintaining the local areas 

      • Repairing roads

  • In 1285, King Edward I ordered all towns to be patrolled at night 

    • This was the responsibility of the night watchman or bellman 

      • They were the town equivalent of a parish constable 

  • By 1663, King Charles II created a force of paid watchmen, known as ‘charlies’ 

    • They were not paid a lot and often needed to have another job

    • They were responsible for patrolling the streets for criminals and observing people 

How Effective Were Parish Constables & Night Watchmen? 

  • Parish constables and night watchmen were considered to be effective, as they were 

    • Knowledgeable of their local area and people 

      • They could easily recognise strangers or those who would make trouble 

    • Maintained order 

      • Their presence prevented crime 

    • Supported JPs

      • They helped JPs enforce laws on vagrancy and religious issues 

  • However, they were also seen as ineffective because they were

    • Untrained 

      • They received no training and were only in the post for a year, so many did not bother to apply for the role 

    • Unpaid 

      • Even paid watchmen ‘charlies’ were not paid enough and often attracted poor applicants 

      • Some saw them as lazy and ineffective 

    • Part-time 

      • Not many people wanted to do the job, as they would have to have another job

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Natasha Smith

Author: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.