Punishments in the Saxon & Medieval Eras (WJEC Eduqas GCSE History): Revision Note
Exam code: C100
What Influenced Punishments in the Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Periods? - Summary
Punishments in Saxon and Medieval England were influenced by religion and community values. People believed that God decided guilt or innocence, which is why trials like trial by ordeal were common. Local communities played an important role in maintaining order, with juries of villagers who knew the accused.
Most punishments were designed to deter crime and shame the offender, such as public whippings, fines, or being placed in the stocks. For repeat offenders, mutilation or even execution could be used. After the Norman Conquest, new ideas such as the murdrum fine and trial by combat showed that punishment was becoming more controlled by the king’s justice, not just local customs.
Harsh Punishments in the Saxon Era
Anglo-Saxon Punishments
There were two types of trial in Anglo-Saxon England:
Trial by jury
Trial by ordeal
Trial by jury
Took place in a court
Men from the village tithing made up the jury
They had to reach a verdict
They did this by listening to accounts from the accused, the accuser and any witnesses
They could also use their knowledge of people’s characters to help
Some cases were settled using oaths to swear innocence
The jury could support the accused by being ‘oath helpers’
These oaths, also known as compurgation, were made ‘before God’
People believed that God would punish those who lied under oath
Trial by ordeal
Often took place in a church
Occurred if a local jury could not reach a verdict
The judgment was then handed over to God
The accused would fast for three days and then hear Mass before the trial
A priest was always present
Ended in 1215
Methods of trial by ordeal
There were different trial by ordeal methods used by the Anglo-Saxons, including
Trial by hot iron
Taken by women (usually)
They would pick up a red-hot weight and walk three paces with it
Their hand would be bandaged up and unwrapped three days later
They were seen as innocent if the wound was healing cleanly after three days
They were seen as guilty if their wound were festering after three days
Trial by hot water
Taken by men (usually)
They would put their hand in boiling water to pick up an object
Their hand would be bandaged and unwrapped after three days
They were seen as innocent if the wound was healing cleanly after three days
They were seen as guilty if the wound was festering after three days
Trial by cold water
Taken by men (usually)
They were tired to a rope and lowered into the water
They were seen as innocent if they sank, as they were accepted by God's pure water
They were seen as guilty if they floated, as they were rejected by God's pure water
Trial by blessed/consecrated bread
Taken by priests (exclusively)
The accused would eat bread blessed by a priest, who prayed that God would choke them if they were guilty
They were seen as innocent if they did not choke
They were seen as guilty if they choked
Anglo-Saxons also used the blood feud system as a form of punishment
A system where a family had the right to murder a member of another family in retaliation for a death
This often led to
Even more violence
Long-running disputes between families
The Anglo-Saxon wergild became an alternative to this
It was more about compensation than retribution
It made further violence much less likely
Fines and compensation became the most common punishments in the Anglo-Saxon era
Criminals had to pay a fine to their victims or their victims’ families
Used for many crimes, including murder
Also used in cases of physical injury
Corporal punishment was fairly common
Frequently, the punishment for reoffenders
Mutilation was used on those who continued to commit petty theft
Offenders had their hand cut off
Capital punishment was rarely used
Reserved for the most serious crimes, like arson or treason
The stocks and pillory were other forms of punishment
Used to humiliate criminals in public
Often punished crimes like public disorder
Medieval Punishments
Many punishments continued into the medieval era, including
Fines
Money collected by wergild fines went to the Crown instead of to the victims
Whipping or flogging
For many different crimes, including not attending church or being a beggar
Stocks and pillories
For minor crimes, including drunkenness
Imprisonment in gaols
For those awaiting a trial or those in debt
Mutilation
For those who regularly commit crimes like theft
They would have their hands or fingers cut off
Execution
For the most serious crimes, including treason and heresy
People were executed by being hanged, burnt alive (for the crime of heresy) or hanged, drawn and executed
The Normans did introduce some changes, such as
The murdrum fine
This had to be paid by the whole region if a Norman was killed
Trial by combat
Men would fight each other over a dispute
Whoever lost the fight or was killed was seen as guilty
If you survived the trial but lost, you would be hanged
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In Question 4, you could be asked to “Explain why punishments were harsh in the Medieval period”. To achieve the higher levels, you need to link your examples to the beliefs and values of the time. Do not just describe what happened.
For example, People in the Anglo-Saxon and medieval periods believed that God decided guilt, so punishments such as trial by ordeal were seen as religious as well as legal.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?