Genesis Creation Accounts (AQA GCSE Religious Studies B): Revision Note

Exam code: 8063

Angela Yates

Written by: Angela Yates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

The literary type of the Genesis accounts

  • The Catholic Church teaches that the two Genesis accounts of creation in the Bible should not be interpreted literally

  • It accepts that they come from a time when myths were common and that they reflect the time in which they were written

    • Genesis 2 was probably written around 950–900 BCE, and Genesis 1 was a poem written around 400 BCE. But spoken (oral) versions of both would have existed long before that time

  • Both accounts can be seen as myths, and they should not be read literally

  • However, Christians believe that they contain deep spiritual truths about the role of God in Creation

  • Catholics believe these truths are:

    • God created everything

    • Everything that God made was good

    • Humans are the pinnacle of God’s creation, made in the “image” of God

  • The Church teaches that when people interpret these texts today, they must look at the deeper truths that the writers intended to convey:

“The interpreter of Sacred Scripture … should carefully investigate what meaning the sacred writers really intended, and what God wanted to manifest by means of their words” (Dei Verbum)

  • Because Catholics do not need to interpret the Genesis accounts literally, they are free to accept scientific accounts about how the world came into existence, such as the Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution

  • Pope Francis explained this in 2014, saying:

“The Big Bang … does not contradict the divine act of creating, but rather requires it. The evolution of nature does not contrast with the notion of Creation, as evolution presupposes the creation of beings that evolve.” (Pope Francis, 27th October 2014)

Different Christian understandings of the Genesis accounts

  • Not all Christians interpret the Genesis Creation stories in the same way

  • Fundamentalist Christians interpret the Bible more literally

    • The Bible is the divinely inspired Word of God and therefore must be accurate in all ways

  • Fundamentalists would argue that the Genesis Creation account is a factual account of what happened and that it should be taken at face value

  • The world and everything in it were literally created in six days, as Genesis 1 describes

    • This rules out the theory of evolution

  • Some would also say that the world is much younger than scientists claim

    • They might agree with Archbishop Ussher, who worked out in the seventeenth century that the Earth was created on 23rd October 4004 BCE 

    • This means that they believe the Earth is just over 6,000 years old

  • Fundamentalist Christians have different interpretations of the Creation accounts

    • Some would say that the Earth is older than Ussher claimed but would still say that the Earth was made in six days

    • Others would say that the word “day did not mean a 24-hour period but a longer period of time

      • This means they believe that the world was created in six time periods” and in the same order described in Genesis 1

    • Some people accept the Big Bang theory, as Genesis 1 starts with God’s first command: Let there be light

      • They do not agree with evolution, as Genesis 2 shows that God made humans separately from animals, rather than humans evolving from animals

  • Catholics would say that those who take the Genesis stories literally and call scientists wrong are making a “category mistake

    • This means they are reading the texts in the wrong way, seeing poetry and myth as factual, historical accounts

Worked Example

Give two messages of the creation stories for Catholics

[2 marks]

Answer:

One message is that God created everything [1 mark]

A second message is that humans are the high point of God’s creation [1 mark]

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You may get a 12-mark question on this topic. For example:

“Modern Christians should interpret the Genesis creation accounts symbolically rather than literally.”

Evaluate this statement. Be sure to include more than one point of view, and refer to Catholic beliefs and teachings in your answer. [12 marks]

For top marks, you must explain different Christian viewpoints and reach a justified conclusion

  • Start by explaining why Catholics support a symbolic interpretation, using teachings such as Dei Verbum and the Church’s acceptance of science. 

  • Then explain why some Christians, such as fundamentalists, reject this view and interpret Genesis literally. 

  • Finally, give your own reasoned judgement, explaining which view you think is more convincing and why. 

To reach the top level, make sure both sides of your argument are developed and linked clearly to Christian beliefs and teachings.

Try practising your answers to these statements from 12-mark questions:

  • “The fundamentalist approach is the only meaningful way to understand the Genesis creation stories.”

  • “Interpreting the Genesis creation stories symbolically weakens Christian belief in God as Creator.”

  • “Scientific theories such as evolution make the Genesis creation accounts unnecessary for Christians today.”

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Angela Yates

Author: Angela Yates

Expertise: Religious Studies Content Creator

Angela graduated with a first-class degree in Theology and Religious Studies from the University of Manchester. After completing a PGCE and CCRS, she taught RE for around fifteen years before becoming a full-time writer and educational content creator. Angela is passionate about creating Religious Education resources to enable students to achieve their full potential.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.