Genesis Creation Accounts (AQA GCSE Religious Studies B): Revision Note
Exam code: 8063
The literary type of the Genesis accounts
The Catholic Church teaches that the two Genesis accounts of creation in the Bible should not be interpreted literally
It accepts that they come from a time when myths were common and that they reflect the time in which they were written
Genesis 2 was probably written around 950–900 BCE, and Genesis 1 was a poem written around 400 BCE. But spoken (oral) versions of both would have existed long before that time
Both accounts can be seen as myths, and they should not be read literally
However, Christians believe that they contain deep spiritual truths about the role of God in Creation
Catholics believe these truths are:
God created everything
Everything that God made was good
Humans are the pinnacle of God’s creation, made in the “image” of God
The Church teaches that when people interpret these texts today, they must look at the deeper truths that the writers intended to convey:
“The interpreter of Sacred Scripture … should carefully investigate what meaning the sacred writers really intended, and what God wanted to manifest by means of their words” (Dei Verbum)
Because Catholics do not need to interpret the Genesis accounts literally, they are free to accept scientific accounts about how the world came into existence, such as the Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution
Pope Francis explained this in 2014, saying:
“The Big Bang … does not contradict the divine act of creating, but rather requires it. The evolution of nature does not contrast with the notion of Creation, as evolution presupposes the creation of beings that evolve.” (Pope Francis, 27th October 2014)
Different Christian understandings of the Genesis accounts
Not all Christians interpret the Genesis Creation stories in the same way
Fundamentalist Christians interpret the Bible more literally
The Bible is the divinely inspired Word of God and therefore must be accurate in all ways
Fundamentalists would argue that the Genesis Creation account is a factual account of what happened and that it should be taken at face value
The world and everything in it were literally created in six days, as Genesis 1 describes
This rules out the theory of evolution
Some would also say that the world is much younger than scientists claim
They might agree with Archbishop Ussher, who worked out in the seventeenth century that the Earth was created on 23rd October 4004 BCE
This means that they believe the Earth is just over 6,000 years old
Fundamentalist Christians have different interpretations of the Creation accounts
Some would say that the Earth is older than Ussher claimed but would still say that the Earth was made in six days
Others would say that the word “day” did not mean a 24-hour period but a longer period of time
This means they believe that the world was created in six “time periods” and in the same order described in Genesis 1
Some people accept the Big Bang theory, as Genesis 1 starts with God’s first command: “Let there be light”
They do not agree with evolution, as Genesis 2 shows that God made humans separately from animals, rather than humans evolving from animals
Catholics would say that those who take the Genesis stories literally and call scientists wrong are making a “category mistake”
This means they are reading the texts in the wrong way, seeing poetry and myth as factual, historical accounts
Worked Example
Give two messages of the creation stories for Catholics
[2 marks]
Answer:
One message is that God created everything [1 mark]
A second message is that humans are the high point of God’s creation [1 mark]
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You may get a 12-mark question on this topic. For example:
“Modern Christians should interpret the Genesis creation accounts symbolically rather than literally.”
Evaluate this statement. Be sure to include more than one point of view, and refer to Catholic beliefs and teachings in your answer. [12 marks]
For top marks, you must explain different Christian viewpoints and reach a justified conclusion.
Start by explaining why Catholics support a symbolic interpretation, using teachings such as Dei Verbum and the Church’s acceptance of science.
Then explain why some Christians, such as fundamentalists, reject this view and interpret Genesis literally.
Finally, give your own reasoned judgement, explaining which view you think is more convincing and why.
To reach the top level, make sure both sides of your argument are developed and linked clearly to Christian beliefs and teachings.
Try practising your answers to these statements from 12-mark questions:
“The fundamentalist approach is the only meaningful way to understand the Genesis creation stories.”
“Interpreting the Genesis creation stories symbolically weakens Christian belief in God as Creator.”
“Scientific theories such as evolution make the Genesis creation accounts unnecessary for Christians today.”
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?