Catholic Tradition & Redemption (AQA GCSE Religious Studies B): Revision Note

Exam code: 8063

Angela Yates

Written by: Angela Yates

Reviewed by: Bridgette Barrett

Updated on

Salvation metaphors in Irenaeus and Anselm

Saint Irenaeus

  • Saint Irenaeus of Lyon (c AD 130–202) was one of the leading teachers of the early Christian Church

  • Irenaeus uses the metaphor of a tree to compare:

    • The event that created the need for salvation (the fall of Adam and Eve) 

    • The event that brought about salvation (Jesus’s sacrificial death)

  • Irenaeus highlights the parallels between these two events by comparing two trees

    • The tree of the knowledge of good and evil

    • The tree of the cross

  • Humans were lost through one tree

    • By eating the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, Adam and Eve disobeyed God and were lost

  • Humans were saved by the tree of the cross

    • Jesus showed total obedience to God by dying on the cross, and this brought salvation from sin

  • Adam and Eve broke humanity’s relationship with God through their disobedience

    • Jesus restored humanity’s relationship with God by accepting God’s will

  • Adam and Eve brought death to humanity by separating humans from God through sin

    • Jesus brought life by offering eternal life in heaven with God to everyone

  • Saint Irenaeus presents Jesus as the “new Adam”, who succeeds where Adam had failed and restores humanity to its intended nature

  • This theory is sometimes known as the recapitulation theory

Saint Anselm

  • Saint Anselm (AD1033–1109) was a leading Christian theologian who served as Archbishop of Canterbury

  • Saint Anselm used a metaphor from slavery to explain Jesus’s redemption

  • He compared Jesus’s death with the idea of “paying a ransom

    • At the time of slavery, a slave could be freed by paying their owner a sum of money. The payment was known as a ransom

  • After the fall of Adam and Eve, humans became slaves to sin

  • The only way to atone — or make up — for this is by showing total obedience to God

  • Through his complete obedience to God, Jesus paid the ransom for the sins of all humans, which only he could do — humans could not repay this debt on their own

  • This meant that Jesus’s sacrifice was a “satisfaction” to God’s honour, allowing all humans to be freed from sin

  • This theory is sometimes known as the satisfaction theory of atonement

Views on Irenaeus’s and Anselm’s metaphors

  • Saint Irenaeus’s metaphor shows a close parallel between the events that led to humanity needing redemption and those that brought about redemption

  • It helps believers to understand that Jesus’s death and resurrection were a complete victory over sin and death

  • Some Christians may disagree with the way that Irenaeus interpreted the story of Adam and Eve

  • Saint Anselm’s metaphor is popular because it illustrates the idea of humans being slaves to sin very well, and this reflects how many people feel about sin

  • Some Christians may not like the idea that humans play no part in salvation because everything was achieved by Jesus

    • However, others believe that it demonstrates the complete power of God

  • Some Christians do not like the idea of a “ransom” payment, questioning to whom it would be paid. This suggests that there may be someone greater than God

    • However, others believe that paying the ransom was necessary to show obedience to God and atone for past disobedience

Worked Example

Which one of the following people compared Jesus’s death with the idea of paying a ransom?

[1 mark]

  1. Saint Anselm

  2. Pope Francis

  3. Saint Paul

  4. Saint Irenaeus

Answer:

  1. Saint Anselm said that Jesus’s obedience paid a ransom for the sins of humanity

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Make sure you can explain how both Saint Irenaeus’s and Saint Anselm’s metaphors help Christians understand salvation. It may help to make a diagram or flow chart to explain each metaphor.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Angela Yates

Author: Angela Yates

Expertise: Religious Studies Content Creator

Angela graduated with a first-class degree in Theology and Religious Studies from the University of Manchester. After completing a PGCE and CCRS, she taught RE for around fifteen years before becoming a full-time writer and educational content creator. Angela is passionate about creating Religious Education resources to enable students to achieve their full potential.

Bridgette Barrett

Reviewer: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.