Catholic Tradition & Redemption (AQA GCSE Religious Studies B): Revision Note
Exam code: 8063
Salvation metaphors in Irenaeus and Anselm
Saint Irenaeus
Saint Irenaeus of Lyon (c AD 130–202) was one of the leading teachers of the early Christian Church
Irenaeus uses the metaphor of a tree to compare:
The event that created the need for salvation (the fall of Adam and Eve)
The event that brought about salvation (Jesus’s sacrificial death)
Irenaeus highlights the parallels between these two events by comparing two trees
The tree of the knowledge of good and evil
The tree of the cross
Humans were lost through one tree
By eating the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, Adam and Eve disobeyed God and were lost
Humans were saved by the tree of the cross
Jesus showed total obedience to God by dying on the cross, and this brought salvation from sin
Adam and Eve broke humanity’s relationship with God through their disobedience
Jesus restored humanity’s relationship with God by accepting God’s will
Adam and Eve brought death to humanity by separating humans from God through sin
Jesus brought life by offering eternal life in heaven with God to everyone
Saint Irenaeus presents Jesus as the “new Adam”, who succeeds where Adam had failed and restores humanity to its intended nature
This theory is sometimes known as the recapitulation theory
Saint Anselm
Saint Anselm (AD1033–1109) was a leading Christian theologian who served as Archbishop of Canterbury
Saint Anselm used a metaphor from slavery to explain Jesus’s redemption
He compared Jesus’s death with the idea of “paying a ransom”
At the time of slavery, a slave could be freed by paying their owner a sum of money. The payment was known as a ransom
After the fall of Adam and Eve, humans became slaves to sin
The only way to atone — or make up — for this is by showing total obedience to God
Through his complete obedience to God, Jesus “paid the ransom” for the sins of all humans, which only he could do — humans could not repay this debt on their own
This meant that Jesus’s sacrifice was a “satisfaction” to God’s honour, allowing all humans to be freed from sin
This theory is sometimes known as the satisfaction theory of atonement
Views on Irenaeus’s and Anselm’s metaphors
Saint Irenaeus’s metaphor shows a close parallel between the events that led to humanity needing redemption and those that brought about redemption
It helps believers to understand that Jesus’s death and resurrection were a complete victory over sin and death
Some Christians may disagree with the way that Irenaeus interpreted the story of Adam and Eve
Saint Anselm’s metaphor is popular because it illustrates the idea of humans being slaves to sin very well, and this reflects how many people feel about sin
Some Christians may not like the idea that humans play no part in salvation because everything was achieved by Jesus
However, others believe that it demonstrates the complete power of God
Some Christians do not like the idea of a “ransom” payment, questioning to whom it would be paid. This suggests that there may be someone greater than God
However, others believe that paying the ransom was necessary to show obedience to God and atone for past disobedience
Worked Example
Which one of the following people compared Jesus’s death with the idea of paying a ransom?
[1 mark]
Saint Anselm
Pope Francis
Saint Paul
Saint Irenaeus
Answer:
Saint Anselm said that Jesus’s obedience paid a ransom for the sins of humanity
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Make sure you can explain how both Saint Irenaeus’s and Saint Anselm’s metaphors help Christians understand salvation. It may help to make a diagram or flow chart to explain each metaphor.
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?