The Treatment of Criminals (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Religious Studies): Revision Note
Exam code: C120
Prison reform
There is a long history of prison reformers in Britain, and many of them were inspired by their religious faith
John Howard was a Calvinist (Protestant) Christian who inspected prisons in the late 18th century
At this time, most prisons were privately run for profit
He gave evidence of the poor conditions to Parliament
He gave recommendations for improvement, including clean running water and access to doctors for inmates. He called for more staff to ensure better safety
Elizabeth Fry was a Quaker who became a prison reformer in the early 19th century
She worked for better education for prison inmates, especially women
She tried to find ways to help prisoners reform so that they would not reoffend
She held Bible readings for inmates
Campaigns by reformers such as Howard and Fry led to widespread changes in UK prisons from the late 19th century onwards

Attribution:
Portrait of Elizabeth Fry by Joseph Simpson, Public Domain
Original source:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elizabeth_Fry_by_Joseph_Simpson.jpg (opens in a new tab)
Prison life in 21st-century Britain
According to UK government statistics, the UK prison population numbers about 98,000 (March 2024 data shows a total of 97,700 prisoners)
Reoffending rates are high, which keeps prison populations high
Concerns have been raised about the treatment of prisoners, eg overcrowding, poor treatment, lack of access to services
Opinions differ about the conditions prisoners should be kept in and the extent to which they should be allowed privileges such as access to TVs or computers
However, all prisoners are entitled to humane treatment that respects their basic human rights
Many believe that prisoners need to have the opportunity of rehabilitation and reform during their sentence to address the problems that led them to commit crimes
The government has highlighted the need for reform of prisons, with education as a key priority
Only 53 per cent of the prison population have any qualifications, compared to 85 per cent of the working-age population
There are still prison reform campaigns today. The Prison Reform Trust works across the UK. It aims to:
Reduce unnecessary imprisonment
Improve treatment and conditions for prisoners
Promote equality and human rights in the justice system
Care for prisoners
Prison chaplains are ministers or leaders who provide pastoral care for prisoners and their families
Chaplains have a range of essential roles, including:
Counselling to inmates
Support and emotional care for a wide range of needs and feelings, such as guilt, fear, loneliness and concern for family
Practical support and advice
Prayer and spiritual support
Working with prison staff, parole officers and volunteers to help with prisoner rehabilitation
Supporting the family and loved ones of the prisoner
Supporting victims of crime
Most chaplains are religious, although they do not have to be. The British Humanist Society runs pastoral support networks at prisons including Winchester Prison
Non-religious chaplains provide similar support but without prayer and religious discussion
The death penalty
The death penalty means the state’s execution of criminals who have committed the worst crimes
It has not been used in the UK since 1969 but is still a common punishment elsewhere in the world for crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and rape
The purpose of the death penalty is to:
Punish the most severe crimes
Bring justice to the victims and their families
Act as a deterrent to others and prevent further crime
Stop that person from committing the serious crime again
Christian attitudes to the death penalty
Christian attitudes to the death penalty vary. This is because of different interpretations of the Bible and teachings about justice, forgiveness and the sanctity of life
Christian arguments against the death penalty
The sanctity of life means that only God has the right to take life
It breaks one of the Ten Commandments:
“You shall not murder.” (Exodus 20:13)
Jesus rejected retribution, teaching instead:
“If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also.” (Matthew 5:38–39)
Jesus also taught love for enemies:
“Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you.” (Matthew 5:44)
Capital punishment goes against Jesus’s teachings and his example
When Jesus was on the cross, he prayed for his executors, saying, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:33–34)
Execution removes the chance for repentance and reformation
It goes against the dignity of the human person and does not uphold their human rights
There is always the risk of error: A wrongful conviction cannot be reversed
History shows that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent
Pope Francis and many modern Christian leaders have spoken out against it, saying it is inadmissible and inconsistent with Christian mercy and human dignity
Older Catholic teaching did support execution only if there was no other way to protect society, but newer teaching adds that modern systems make this almost unnecessary
“The dignity of the human person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes.” (Pope John Paul II, The Gospel of Life)
Quakers have campaigned against the death penalty for almost 200 years because they believe:
Every person contains a reflection of the image of God
All life must be treated with respect
Punishment must always be for reform, never retribution
Christian arguments for the death penalty
The death penalty is justified in the Old Testament
“Whoever sheds human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed.” (Genesis 9:6)
Some Christians believe in retribution: If someone takes a life, they should lose their own. This is based on the Old Testament teaching:
“An eye for an eye.” (Exodus 21:24)
The sanctity of life means life is sacred and holy. Some argue that killing a murderer upholds this by showing the seriousness of taking life
Jesus never directly said the death penalty was wrong
In the Middle Ages, the death penalty was used to punish crimes against Church authority
St Paul taught that people should obey those in authority:
“Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established.” (Romans 13:1)
Some Christians interpret this as support for the state’s right to use capital punishment
The death penalty is seen as giving justice to the victim and their family
It is also seen as an effective deterrent, helping to maintain law and order
Muslim attitudes to the death penalty
Muslim arguments for the death penalty
The Qur’an supports the death penalty for the most serious crimes where justice requires it
Shari’ah law allows capital punishment for certain offences, including:
Murder (qisas / retributive justice)
Adultery (in some interpretations)
Violent crimes that threaten society
Treason or openly attacking the Muslim community
The Qur’an teaches that life is sacred but may be taken “with just cause” (Qur’an 17:33), meaning in cases where justice requires it
“Do not take life, which God has made sacred, except by right.” (Qur’an 6:151)
Some Muslims believe the death penalty protects the ummah by removing dangerous offenders
Others argue it gives retributive justice (qisas) to victims’ families by matching the seriousness of the crime
In some Islamic legal systems, the death penalty is seen as a strong deterrent intended to prevent further crime
Muslim arguments against the death penalty
A growing number of Muslims disagree with the death penalty and call for it to be abolished
They support this using the same Qur’an verse as those who support it, but they place greater emphasis on the first part of the teaching:
“Never take life, which God has made sacred, except for a just cause.” (Qur’an 17:33)
The sanctity of life means all life belongs to Allah, and no one but Allah should ever take a life
The Qur’an teaches that those who show mercy will be rewarded (Qur’an 5:45)
Some Muslims allow the victim or family to receive compensation or “blood money” instead of imposing the death penalty
Many Muslims support this because it promotes peace and reconciliation
Some Muslim scholars argue that human justice systems can make mistakes, so irreversible punishments should be avoided
In countries where the death penalty is outlawed, Muslims accept the law of the land as long as it does not force them to act against their faith
Many Muslims believe that prison sentences can still protect society while allowing offenders to repent and reform
All Muslims believe that everyone will face Allah’s perfect justice on the Day of Judgment, so some argue that earthly execution is unnecessary
A number of modern Muslim thinkers argue that capital punishment has been misused by corrupt governments and applied unfairly, which goes against Islamic justice
Humanist views of the death penalty
Most humanists oppose the death penalty
They do not use religious ideas such as the sanctity of life
They use principles of human rights and compassion to support their views
Justice should focus on protecting society, supporting victims and giving offenders a chance to reform
Reasons humanists reject the death penalty include:
Human rights: All people should be treated with dignity, even those who commit serious crimes
Possibility of error: Miscarriages of justice cannot be corrected once someone is executed
Lack of evidence: Research shows the death penalty does not work as an effective deterrent
Reform is possible: People can change. Execution removes any chance of rehabilitation
Discrimination: In many countries, the death penalty is applied unfairly, often affecting poorer people or minority groups
State power: Premeditated killing is wrong, even when carried out by the state
Worked Example
What is meant by “capital punishment”?
[2 marks]
Answer:
Capital punishment is the legally authorised killing of someone as a punishment for a serious crime, usually murder.
Examiner Tips and Tricks
You may be asked about attitudes to the death penalty in both C-type and D-type questions.
C-type questions (Explain)
Example:
“Explain, from either two religions or two religious traditions, attitudes to the death penalty.” [8 marks]
For these, you must explain the views clearly and support them with evidence, such as teachings, quotes or key principles.
D-type questions (Discuss/evaluate)
Example:
“‘The death penalty is justified for murderers.’ Discuss this statement.”
You need to analyse and evaluate, which means using evidence, explaining both sides and giving a well-reasoned judgement.
A good way to prepare is to make a short list of the strongest points and key teachings for each viewpoint.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?