Management Decision-Making (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Accounting): Revision Note

Exam code: 9706

Seina Murakami

Written by: Seina Murakami

Reviewed by: Dan Finlay

Updated on

Make-or-buy

How is make-or-buy decision-making supported by marginal costing data?

  • Sometimes the owners of a business have to decide whether to make a product themselves or buy it from a supplier

  • Marginal costing focuses on variable costs 

    • Variable cost per unit of producing internally can be compared with the purchase price from an external supplier to make decisions on whether it is better to make in-house or buy externally 

  • Marginal costing excludes fixed overheads from cost calculation 

    • This prevents overestimating the cost of in-house production, so fair comparisons can be made

Worked Example

Company A manufactures Product X and the following budgeted information is available.

Selling price

$100 per unit

Direct materials

$30 per unit

Direct labour

5 hours at $10 per hour

Monthly capacity

20 000 units

Monthly output and sales

14 000 units

Company A is aware there is an external supplier that can provide 13 000 units of Product X a month, resulting in a contribution of $30 per unit.

Advise Company A on whether they should continue manufacturing Product X internally or purchase from the external supplier.

Answer:

Contribution per unit of producing internally:

Contribution = Selling price - Direct materials - Direct labour

$100 - $30 - (5 × $10) = $20 per unit

This shows that purchasing from the external supplier would give a greater contribution; $30 per unit compared to $20 per unit.

Purchasing from the external supplier is better than producing Product X internally.

However, Company A must also make note that the external supplier can only supply 13 000 units each month, which is 1 000 units less than the monthly sales, meaning 1 000 units of sales will be lost each month.

Special orders

How is decision-making for special orders supported by marginal costing data?

  • A special order is when a product is sold a lower price than usual

  • Special orders are accepted if they have a positive contribution 

    • Contribution スペース イコール スペース Sales スペース revenue スペース ひく スペース Variable スペース costs

    • Traditional absorption costing may make a product look unprofitable if fixed overheads are allocated

  • However, sometimes orders with negative contributions may be accepted to:

    • avoid redundancies

    • stimulate future orders

    • raise brand awareness

    • break into a new market

    • dispose of discontinued inventory

Worked Example

Z Limited manufactures product Q and the following data is available.

Selling price per unit

$35

Contribution per unit

$20

Fixed costs per month

$19 000

Factory capacity per month

2 000 units (currently the factory is operating at 70% capacity)

The directors are considering accepting a special order from a customer. The order is for 500 units and there are slight changes to the product design which will add $2.50 per unit to variable costs. The customer has offered to pay $30 per unit.

Advise the directors whether or not they should accept the special order from the customer.

Answer:

Original variable cost per unit:

Selling price per unit - Contribution per unit

$35 - $20 = $15 per unit

New variable cost per unit:

$15 + $2.50 = $17.50 per unit

Contribution per unit from special order:

$30 - $17.50 = $12.50 per unit

The directors should accept the special order. Although the contribution is less than normal orders ($12.50 per unit compared to $15 per unit), the special order still provides positive contribution. Fixed costs remain unchanged and the special order contributes to covering fixed costs. The factory is currently producing 1 400 units (2 000 × 70%) and is able to accept the 500 unit special order which will prevent redundancies.

The directors must ensure the special order is kept separate from regular orders and that regular orders are met comfortably and prioritised.

Closure of a business unit

How is decision-making for the closure of a business unit supported using marginal costing data?

  • Decisions regarding discontinuation of a product line and closure of a business unit can be supported using marginal costing data

  • Calculating the contribution can help with the decision-making 

    • If a unit has a positive contribution, closing the unit will reduce overall profit, even if it appears unprofitable after fixed cost allocation 

    • Positive contributions will help to cover common fixed costs across units

Worked Example

A factory manufactures Product C and D. There is a forecasted loss of Product D.

The directors are considering discontinuing Product D.

Discontinuing D would result in redundancy costs of $2 000 (because the supervisor for Product D would no longer be required) but is expected to increase the sales revenue of Product C by 20%.

Product C
$

Product D
$

Sales revenue

10 000

8 000

Direct materials

5 000

4 000

Direct labour

1 500

2 000

Supervisor fixed salaries

500

1 500

Variable overheads

1 000

500

Fixed factory overheads

500

400

Advise the directors on whether they should discontinue Product D or not.

Answer:

Find the profit/loss for both products

Product C
$

Product D
$

Revenue

10 000

8 000

Direct materials

(5 000)

(4 000)

Direct labour

(1 500)

(2 000)

Variable overheads

(1 000)

(500)

Contribution

2 500

1 500

Less: Fixed costs

Supervisor fixed salaries

(500)

(1 500)

Fixed factory overheads

(500)

(400)

Profit/loss

1 500

(400)

Current net profit:

$1 500 - $400 = $1 100

Product C new sale revenue

$10 000 × 20% = $2 000

$10 000 + $2 000 = $12 000

Product C new profit:

$1 500 + $2 000 = $3 500

Redundancy cost incurred $2 000

New net profit

$3 500 - $2 000 = $1 500

The directors should discontinue product D. The net profit increases by $400 if product D is discontinued. However, directors must consider how reliable the forecast that sales revenue will increase by 20% is. They also must consider how staff redundancy will impact staff morale and motivation. Existing customers may also be made unhappy by the discontinuation of product D and may be lost to competitors.

Limiting factors

How is decision-making regarding limiting factor supported by marginal costing data?

  • Decision-making regarding which products should be prioritised in the product mix when there is a limiting factor can be supported using marginal costing data

  • Limited factors could be:

    • limited materials

    • limited labour

  • STEP 1

    Calculate contribution per unit of limiting factor

    • To identify which product gives the highest return per constrained resource

      • E.g. if machine hours are limiting:

      • Contribution スペース per スペース machine スペース hour スペース イコール スペース Machine スペース hours スペース per スペース unit 分の Contribution スペース per スペース unit 分数の終わり

  • STEP 2

    Rank the products by contribution per unit of limiting factor

    • Allocate the limiting resource to the higher ranking products first and continue until limiting resource is fully used

Worked Example

G Limited manufactures the following products and the following data is available.

Product F:

Product G:

Product H:

Selling price per unit

$50 per unit

$30 per unit

$40 per unit

Monthly demand

1 000 units

5 000 units

2 500 units

Materials used per unit

10kg

4kg

7kg

Material cost per kg

$2 per kg

$2 per kg

$2 per kg

Labour cost per unit

$15 per unit

$12 per unit

$8 per unit

Monthly fixed costs

$5 000

$4 500

$1 900

Only 40 000kg of materials are available in the month of February.

Calculate the optimum production plan to maximise profit.

Answer:

Calculate the contribution per unit per kg

Product F

$

Product G

$

Product H

$

Selling price

50

30

40

Direct materials

2 × 10

(20)

2 × 4

(8)

2 × 7

(14)

Direct labour

(15)

(12)

(8)

Contribution per unit

15

10

18

Contribution per kg

15 ÷ 10

1.50

10 ÷ 4

2.50

18 ÷ 7

2.57

Use the resources in the following order:

  • Priority 1: Product H

  • Priority 2: Product G

  • Priority 3: Product F

Product H

2 500 units × 7kg = 17 500kg

Product G

40 000kg - 17 500kg = 22 500kg

5 000 units × 4kg = 20 000kg

Product F

22 500kg - 20 000kg = 2 500kg

2 500kg ÷ 10kg = 250 units

The optimum production plan is:

Product F

Product G

Product H

250 units

5 000 units

2 500 units

Target profit

How is decision-making regarding target profit supported by marginal costing data?

  • Sales to achieve target profit can be calculated using marginal costing

    • Number スペース of スペース units スペース to スペース achieve スペース target スペース profit スペース イコール スペース Contribution スペース per スペース unit 分の Fixed スペース costs スペース たす スペース Target スペース profit 分数の終わり

    • Sales スペース revenue スペース to スペース achieve スペース target スペース profit スペース イコール スペース Contribution スペース to スペース sales スペース ratio 分の Fixed スペース costs スペース たす スペース Target スペース profit 分数の終わり

  • Determines how many units must be sold to reach a desired profit 

  • Helps make decisions on selling price to ensure the target profit will be reached within expected sales volume 

  • Identifies how changes in variable costs or fixed costs would impact the ability to reach target profit 

  • Calculation of margin of safety Margin スペース of スペース safety スペース in スペース units スペース イコール スペース Forecast スペース sales スペース units スペース ひく スペース Number スペース of スペース units スペース to スペース achieve スペース target スペース profit

    • Assists risk assessment 

      • Shows how much sales can drop before the company fails to meet the target profit

Worked Example

Company Z manufactures a single product and the following data is available for a month.

$

Sales revenue

500 000

Variable costs

150 000

Fixed costs

50 000

The directors require a target profit of $75 000 next month.

Calculate the sale revenue required to achieve the target profit.

Answer:

Calculation the contribution

Contribution = Sales revenue - Variable costs

$500 000 - $150 000 = $350 000

Calculate the contribution to sales revenue

Contribution to sales ratio = Contribution ÷ Sales revenue

$350 000 ÷ $500 000 = 0.70

Use the formula

Sales revenue required to achieve target profit = (Fixed costs + Target profit) ÷ Contribution to sales ratio

($50 000 + $75 000) ÷ 0.70 = $178 571.4286

Sales revenue required is $178 572

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Seina Murakami

Author: Seina Murakami

Expertise: Accounting Content Creator

Seina studied Pharmacology at UCL, though her professional passion lies deeply in the world of accounting and finance. With an A* in CIE A-Level Accounting and extensive experience tutoring IGCSE and IAL students, she specializes in making complex financial concepts accessible. From developing comprehensive revision resources to collaborating with faculty on lesson materials, Seina is dedicated to helping students bridge the gap between struggling with content and mastering it.

Dan Finlay

Reviewer: Dan Finlay

Expertise: Maths Subject Lead

Dan graduated from the University of Oxford with a First class degree in mathematics. As well as teaching maths for over 8 years, Dan has marked a range of exams for Edexcel, tutored students and taught A Level Accounting. Dan has a keen interest in statistics and probability and their real-life applications.