State Control of the Economy (Edexcel A Level History): Revision Note

Exam code: 9HI0

Zoe Wade

Written by: Zoe Wade

Reviewed by: Natasha Smith

Updated on

Timeline & Summary

A timeline diagram showing key economic developments and ideological shifts in the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1928.

Top row (above the timeline):

1917: “Creation of Vesenkha: Central control of economy begins” (pink box – Left/pro-command economy).

1923: “Scissors Crisis: Agriculture recovers faster than industry” (blue box – Right/pro-NEP).

1927–28: “Grain Procurement Crisis & failures of the NEP: Party turns towards the Left” (purple box – shift point).

Bottom row (below the timeline):

1921: “Introduction of the NEP: Shift towards limited private trade” (blue box – Right/pro-NEP).

Mid-1920s: “Great Industrialisation Debate: The Party is divided into Left, Centre and Right” (grey box – neutral).
  • This note will examine why state control of the economy was fundamental in the Soviet state

  • The Bolsheviks established Vesenkha to centralise and direct the economy after the Revolution

  • Party debates in the 1920s revealed deep divisions over the pace and method of industrialisation

    • This is known as the Great Industrialisation Debate

  • The eventual adoption of a command economy was shaped by:

    • Political necessity

    • Ideological arguments

    • Economic crisis

  • Historians debate whether the command economy was inevitable or a product of Stalin’s leadership

The Vesenkha

  • The government established Vesenkha in December 1917

    • Its full name is the Supreme Council of the National Economy

    • It was tasked with managing industry and finance

  • Its roles included:

    • Reorganising industry to improve efficiency

    • Nationalising banks, transport, and large-scale industry

    • Setting production targets and directing resources to key sectors

  • Vesenkha became the most important institution of economic management

  • By the 1920s, its role expanded to:

    • Supervising state-run businesses

    • Coordinating long-term economic planning

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Students often confuse Vesenkha with other Bolshevik organisations, such as Sovnarkom or the Politburo.

The key difference is Vesenkha was solely focused on the economy, whereas Sovnarkom or the Politburo had broader political responsibilities and oversight.

Party opinions on the economy

  • The Communist Party was deeply divided in the 1920s over how to rebuild the economy after War Communism and the NEP

The Left: “Dictatorship of Industry”

Key ideas

  • Rapid industrialisation led by the state

  • Prioritise heavy industry to build socialism quickly

  • Forced collectivisation in agriculture

    • The state could take all of the profits from farms and fund industrialisation

    • They acknowledged that the policy would anger peasants

Supporters of the Left

  • Trotsky

  • Zinoviev

  • Kamenev

The Right: “Building Socialism with Capitalist Hands”

Key ideas

  • A continuation of the NEP

  • Allowing private trade and small-scale capitalism to help the economy recover before socialism could be achieved

  • Saw peasants as essential allies who should not be alienated

Supporters of the Right

  • Bukharin

  • Rykov

  • Tomsky

The Centre: Pragmatism

Key ideas

  • Adopted a flexible approach

    • They believed that 'whatever works' at the time was the right policy

  • Economic policy should be decided on the nation's demands, not ideology

  • Initially supported the NEP until 1927, when economic growth slowed

Supporters of the Centre

  • Stalin

An illustration showing key Bolshevik leaders in the power struggle after Lenin’s death. In the center is Stalin, positioned between left-wing and right-wing figures. On the left-wing are Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev. On the right-wing are Bukharin, Rykov, and Tomsky. A pink arrow runs from "Left-wing" to "Right-wing" at the bottom, showing the ideological spectrum.
An illustration showing the political opinions of key members of the Communist Party

The Great Industrialisation Debate (1920s)

  • This debate dominated Party politics in the 1920s

  • During the 1920s, the Right won countless debates in Congress

    • This made it impossible for supporters of the Left to take power

      • Economic policy was one of the reasons why the Party turned against Trotsky

  • As economic problems worsened. the Centre, led by Stalin, eventually shifted towards the Left position

    • This won a lot of support from most members of the Party

  • The debate laid the groundwork for:

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Understanding the political Left and Right in the Great Industrialisation Debate is key for essays on Stalin’s rise to power.

Try creating a revision mnemonic or drawing to help you identify the aims of the Left and Right. An example can be seen below:

"The Left launch, and the Right rest"

A cartoon-style educational image depicting three figures representing key Soviet leaders and their economic policy choices. In the center stands Joseph Stalin with a stern expression, arms folded, and a blue industrial symbol behind him. He is flanked by two contrasting characters:

On the left, a cheerful and energetic Leon Trotsky is leaping into the air with a fist raised. Below him, blue text reads:
"LAUNCH into fast industrialisation".

On the right, a relaxed and content-looking Nikolai Bukharin is sitting back comfortably in an armchair with eyes closed and hands behind his head. Below him, grey text reads:
"REST and continue with the NEP".

Beneath Stalin is the central question in bold text:
"STALIN – LAUNCH or REST?"
A revision mnemonic to help the memorisation of the economic aims of the Left and Right in the 1920s

Why did the USSR adopt a command economy?

  • By the late 1920s, the NEP was seen as inadequate to deal with the USSR’s economic challenges

Economic pressures

Agriculture

  • Peasants were reluctant to sell grain at the low, fixed state prices

    • In 1927–28, this led to the grain procurement crisis

      • Peasants hoarded grain instead of selling it, creating shortages in the towns

  • The crisis revealed that the NEP had not solved the 'grain problem'

    • The state could not guarantee enough food supplies for the growing urban workforce

Industry

  • Industrial recovery under the NEP was much slower than agricultural recovery

  • The gap between agriculture and industry meant peasants had little incentive to trade grain for overpriced manufactured goods

    • This convinced many Bolsheviks that the NEP could not deliver the rapid industrialisation needed to strengthen socialism

Political pressures

  • Stalin used the failures of the NEP to:

    • Discredit the Right

    • Win the support of the Left and the Centre of the Party

    • Consolidate his own authority

Ideological goals

  • Many Bolsheviks saw rapid industrialisation as essential to:

    • Building socialism

    • Defending the USSR from capitalist powers

International context

  • Fear of war with the West made self-sufficiency through industrialisation seem urgent

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Zoe Wade

Author: Zoe Wade

Expertise: History Content Creator

Zoe has worked in education for 10 years as a teaching assistant and a teacher. This has given her an in-depth perspective on how to support all learners to achieve to the best of their ability. She has been the Lead of Key Stage 4 History, showing her expertise in the Edexcel GCSE syllabus and how best to revise. Ever since she was a child, Zoe has been passionate about history. She believes now, more than ever, the study of history is vital to explaining the ever-changing world around us. Zoe’s focus is to create accessible content that breaks down key historical concepts and themes to achieve GCSE success.

Natasha Smith

Reviewer: Natasha Smith

Expertise: History Content Creator

After graduating with a degree in history, Natasha gained her PGCE at Keele University. With more than 10 years of teaching experience, Natasha taught history at both GCSE and A Level. Natasha's specialism is modern world history. As an educator, Natasha channels this passion into her work, aiming to instil in students the same love for history that has fuelled her own curiosity.