Pressure Group Influence (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note
Exam code: 9PL0
The classification of pressure groups
Pressure groups are organisations that seek to influence government policy without putting candidates forward for election
They play a major role in UK democracy by providing expertise, representing interests and mobilising public participation
Their influence depends on their type, methods and relationship with the government
Types of pressure groups
Sectional groups
These represent a specific section of society, such as a profession or union
E.g., the British Medical Association (BMA) represents doctors and campaigns on pay, working conditions, and NHS policy — membership is limited to qualified medics
Causal groups
These groups campaign for a cause that benefits wider society, rather than just members
E.g., Greenpeace promotes environmental protection and climate action for everyone
Insider groups
These have close links with government and are often consulted on new laws or policy decisions
E.g. The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) regularly advises DEFRA on farming and food policy, for example, meeting with the new DEFRA Secretary of State on her first day in office in 2025
Outsider groups
These lack government access and therefore rely on public pressure, media, and protest
E.g., Extinction Rebellion (XR) uses non-violent direct action and high-profile protests to draw attention to climate change
How pressure groups exert influence
Pressure groups use a range of methods to influence government, including lobbying ministers, organising direct action, launching legal challenges and running media or petition campaigns
Method | Successful example | Unsuccessful example |
|---|---|---|
Lobbying government ministers |
|
|
Direct Action: including protests, advertising and civil disobedience |
|
|
Legal action: using the courts to challenge government decisions |
|
|
Media campaigns and petitions |
|
|
Factors affecting pressure group success
Insider status gives direct access to decision-makers
Public support increases media coverage and political attention
Resources fund staff, research, campaigns and legal action
Expertise makes groups valuable to government when drafting complex policy
Opposition from rival groups or government reduces chances of success
Methods can raise awareness, but disruptive action risks alienating the public
Comparing pressure group activity
How pressure groups support democracy
Promote participation
Provide opportunities to engage in politics between elections
E.g., Around 300,000 people joined pro-Palestinian protests in London in 2024
Improve political education
Raise awareness of issues neglected by government
E.g., River Action drew attention to river pollution during the 2024 Boat Race
Represent minority interests
Give a voice to groups overlooked by political parties
E.g.,Liberty supported John Walker’s successful case for equal pension rights in 2017
Hold government to account
Challenge government actions in courts and the media
E.g.,Liberty’s continued challenges to surveillance powers under the Investigatory Powers Act
Provide expertise
Offer specialist knowledge that improves decision-making
E.g., Domestic abuse groups informed testing of emergency phone alerts
How pressure groups can hinder democracy
Lack of accountability
Unelected groups can heavily influence policy
E.g., The IEA was linked to Truss’ mini-budget but could not be held accountable for its impact
Elitism and unequal influence
Wealthy or well-connected groups gain disproportionate access
Seen in the influence of various “Tufton Street” organisations
Disruptive or unlawful activity
Actions can inconvenience the public or undermine support
E.g., Insulate Britain and Just Stop Oil caused major disruption to motorists
Distortion of debate
Some groups spread disinformation that misleads the public
Includes anti-vaccine groups and conspiracy-driven campaigns
Case Study
Comparing pressure group activity

Case study 1: National Farmers’ Union (NFU)
(insider, expertise-based influence)
Represents farmers and agricultural producers
Insider group with strong government access
Methods: lobbying ministers, providing expert evidence, participating in consultations
E.g.,met with new DEFRA Secretary of State on her first day in office in 2025
Influence: often shapes agricultural and food policy because government relies on its expertise
Limitations: influence reduced where government policy conflicts with fiscal or political priorities (e.g., inheritance tax concerns were ignored)
Case study 2: Extinction Rebellion (XR)
(outsider, protest-based influence)
An environmental movement focused on direct action
Methods: high-visibility protest, civil disobedience, media disruption
E.g., large-scale roadblocks and protests to highlight climate inaction
Influence: successfully keeps climate change in public debate
Limitations: disruptive tactics alienate the public (e.g., 72% disapproved of motorway blockages), reducing political sympathy
Comparison
NFU uses insider, expertise-driven methods; XR uses outsider, disruptive protest
NFU has direct access to policy-makers; XR relies on public pressure
NFU’s influence is typically long-term and policy-focused; XR’s is agenda-setting but politically volatile
Public support helps XR when issues resonate, but resources and access give NFU more consistent influence
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?