Representative & Direct Democracy (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Sarra Jenkins

Written by: Sarra Jenkins

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

Representative democracy

  • Representative democracy is a system where citizens elect people or political parties to make decisions and govern on their behalf, rather than participating directly in law-making

    • E.g. In the 2024 General Election, 29 million voters elected 650 MPs, giving the Labour Party a majority with 411 seats

  • Democracy comes from the Greek words ‘demos’ and ‘kratos’ and can be literally translated as ‘rule of the people’

Features of representative democracy

1. Accountability

  • Representatives must justify their decisions and actions to voters at election time

    • If voters are unhappy with performance, they can remove the representative or the governing party

  • This creates a continuous incentive for MPs and governments to act in the public interest

    • E.g. In the 2010 General Election, Labour lost power after voter dissatisfaction with issues such as the financial crisis and leadership

2. Frequency

  • Elections occur on a predictable timetable, giving stability and regular opportunities for democratic input

  • Fixed terms help ensure fairness by preventing governments from calling elections purely for political advantage

    • E.g. In the UK, General Elections are typically held every 5 years under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act

3. Practicality

  • Representative democracy allows complex decisions to be made by people with the time and resources to analyse issues in depth

  • It works effectively in large, modern states where direct participation by millions would be unrealistic

  • Representatives can consult experts, committees and evidence before making decisions

4. Expertise

  • Those elected are expected to bring a range of skills to their role, such as

    • an understanding of the law

    • awareness of social issues and cultural backgrounds

    • strong spoken communication abilities

    • the ability to assess information and draw logical conclusions

    • being able to listen carefully and respond appropriately

    • clear, logical reasoning when solving problems

    • a careful approach with strong attention to detail

Evaluating representative democracy

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Works well in large populations

  • Representatives can be held accountable through regular elections

  • Decisions made by people with expertise

  • Complex issues can be researched and understood fully

  • Minority views can be protected

  • More stable and consistent decision-making

  • Reduces sudden or emotional decisions

  • Government may become unresponsive

  • Risk of elitism, where those with wealth or connections may have more influence

  • Low turnout can reduce legitimacy

  • Representatives may break promises

  • Pressure groups and lobbyists can influence decisions too strongly

  • Parties may prioritise political strategy over the public interest

Direct democracy

  • Direct democracy is a system where citizens make political decisions themselves by voting on individual issues rather than electing representatives to decide for them

    • E.g. In the 2016 Brexit referendum, 33.5 million voters chose to leave the EU by 52% to 48%

Features of direct democracy

1. Accountability

  • Citizens make the decisions themselves, so responsibility cannot be passed to elected representatives

  • Voters must live with the direct outcomes of their choices, increasing the sense of ownership

2. Frequency

  • Decisions are made whenever an issue arises rather than waiting for a scheduled election

  • This allows a more immediate response to public concerns or emerging issues

3. Practicality

  • Effective when dealing with single, clear issues where the public can give a simple Yes/No response

  • Direct democracy works best in smaller or more localised settings where participation is easier

    • E.g. Local referendums on neighbourhood planning or council tax rises in some UK areas

4. Expertise

  • All citizens can participate regardless of political knowledge, education or experience

  • This increases democratic participation but may lead to decisions influenced by emotion or misinformation

Evaluating direct democracy

Advantages

Disadvantages

  • Decisions reflect the public’s wishes

  • All citizens have an equal voice

  • Encourages participation and increases legitimacy

  • Educates the public on political issues

  • Can act as a strong check on government

  • Impractical in large, modern societies if used often

  • Politicians have little accountability after a referendum

  • Voters may lack expertise

  • Complex issues can be oversimplified into yes/no choices

  • Risk of tyranny of the majority

  • Public opinion can be influenced by media or misinformation

  • Can cause decision fatigue if used too frequently

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The advantages and disadvantages of representative and direct democracy are broadly inverse - the advantages of representative democracy can be seen to be the disadvantages of direct democracy, and vice versa.

Case Study

Evaluating Direct Democracy

The Brexit referendum demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy

Map of Europe showing EU countries in blue with yellow stars and the UK in red with its flag, highlighting Brexit context.
The 2016 referendum on whether the UK should remain in the EU demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of direct democracy
  • Advantages

    • 33.5 million voted, a turnout of 72.2% – highest since the 1992 General Election, showing strong public participation and legitimacy for the decision

    • The result was 52% voting to leave. Whilst it was close, the outcome was clear and the government acted upon it

  • Disadvantages

    • The Brexit vote oversimplified a complex issue into a single “Leave/Remain” choice, leaving a great deal of uncertainty over the UK’s future relationship with the EU

    • The result created division and tyranny of the majority, as those who voted Remain felt ignored, leading to political and social polarisation

Is UK democracy healthy?

Yes, it is

  • The UK’s democracy can be considered healthy for a range of reasons

    • High turnout in referendums showing public desire to participate, lending legitimacy to decisions

      • Turnout in the 2014 Scottish Independence referendum was 85%

      • In 2016 turnout for the Brexit referendum was 72%

    • Growth of the use of e-petitions which have informed Parliamentary action

      • In 2019, the Revoke Article 50 (leaving the EU) petition gained more than 6 million signatures

    • Devolution has allowed for local decision making

      • Scottish universities offer free tuition fees for Scottish students, whilst Mayor of London Sadiq Khan introduced the world’s largest clean air zone in London

    • Increasing voter choice with third parties becoming more popular

      • 43% of voters cast their vote for a party other than Labour or Conservative in the 2024 General Election

    • Rights are well protected through legislation and an independent judiciary

      • E.g. the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Equality Act 2010

No, it is not

  • However, there are some significant signs that the UK’s democracy is unhealthy

    • In recent years, turnout has been low in elections

      • Just 59.7% of people voted in the 2024 General Election and 34% in the 2025 local elections

    • The House of Lords is unelected but has considerable power

      • E.g. House of Lords objections to the 2024 Rwanda Bill led to considerable delay

    • The introduction of Voter ID laws in 2023 risks disenfranchising voters

      • 4% of people who did not vote in 2024 said it was due to voter ID requirements

      • 1 in every 1200 voters was not issued with a ballot paper due to not having suitable ID documents

    • First Past The Post (FPTP) distorts representation

      • The 2024 election was the most disproportionate ever, with Labour gaining just 33.7% of the vote but 63% of the seats

    • The lack of a codified constitution means that rights can be changed easily

      • E.g. the swift introduction of voter ID laws in 2023

The case for democratic reform

Recent examples of democratic reform

  • The Human Rights Act 1998

    • This law codified the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law to better protect individuals' rights

  • Constitutional Reform Act 2005

    • This led to the creation of the UK Supreme Court (operational from 2009)

  • Equality Act 2010

    • This law prevents discrimination on nine protected characteristics, including gender, race and disability

  • Succession to the Crown Act 2013

    • This law ensured that it was the first-born child rather than first-born son was next in line to the throne of the UK

  • Recall of MPs Act 2015

    • This law allowed constituents to force a by-election if their MP receives a custodial sentence, is suspended from the House of Commons for 10 or more days or is convicted under the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009

  • E-petitions

    • From 2015, the House of Commons took responsibility for the e-petitions system

The potential for further reform

Reform

Advantages

Disadvantages

Introduce proportional representation

  • This reform would ensure that the number of seats won more accurately reflects the votes cast

  • It could also increase turnout by making more people feel that their vote matters

  • It would weaken the traditional link between MPs and their constituencies

  • It would also make coalition governments more likely, which can reduce stability

Abolish the House of Lords or make it elected

  • Making the Lords elected would increase its democratic legitimacy

  • It would also make members more accountable for their decisions

  • An elected Lords could create legislative gridlock with the House of Commons

  • It might also lead to the two chambers competing for political authority

Lower the voting age to 16

  • Reducing the voting age could increase turnout by involving young people earlier in political life

  • It would also support political education and build lifelong voting habits, as shown in Scotland

  • Turnout could fall if 16–17-year-olds choose not to vote

  • Some young people may lack the political maturity or knowledge to make informed choices

Introduce online voting

  • Online voting would make participation easier and more convenient

  • It could also increase turnout by reducing practical barriers to voting.

  • Online systems carry risks of fraud or cybersecurity breaches

  • Digital exclusion could disadvantage people without internet or digital skills

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sarra Jenkins

Author: Sarra Jenkins

Expertise: Content Writer

Sarra is a highly experienced A-Level Politics educator with over two decades of teaching and examining experience. She was part of the team that wrote the Edexcel 2017 Politics Specification and currently works as a Senior Examiner. A published author of 14 textbooks and revision guides, her expertise lies in UK and US politics, exam skills, and career guidance. She continues to teach, driven by her passion for this "evolving and dynamic subject".

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.