Funding of Political Parties (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Sarra Jenkins

Written by: Sarra Jenkins

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

How are UK political parties funded?

  • Political parties need money to function, campaign and compete in elections

  • The UK has a mixed funding model involving private donations, membership fees and limited public funding

  • This has created ongoing debates about fairness, influence and transparency

Funding sources

Diagram of funding sources includes membership subscriptions, large private donations, trade union donations, and public funding connected to a central circle.
Source of funds for political parties

Membership subscriptions

  • Members pay annual fees

  • Important for Labour, which gained over £18 million from membership in 2024

Large private donations

  • Wealthy individuals and companies can donate significant sums

    • E.g., Businessman Frank Hester and his company TPP gave the Conservatives £15 million for the 2024 general election

Trade union donations

  • Especially important for Labour

  • Major unions (Unite, GMB, Unison) each donate around £1 million annually

Public funding

  • No public money for general election campaigning

  • But opposition parties receive:

    • Short Money, to support parliamentary work

    • Policy Development Grants, for research and policy work

  • This funding is distributed by the Electoral Commission

Case Study

Case Study: Labour Party Income, 2024

Income Source

Amount (£)

Membership

£18,321,000

Miscellaneous

£7,162,000

Donations

£40,288,000

Commercial Activities

£13,489,000

Fundraising

£2,194,000

Grant

£4,063,000

Total

£90,748,000

Case Study

Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act (PPERA) 2000

The PPERA (2000) tightened UK election rules by creating the Electoral Commission (opens in a new tab), introducing strict donation and spending limits for parties, and increasing transparency.

It aimed to curb undue influence, ensure fairer campaigning, and strengthen public trust in political funding and electoral processes.

Enforcement Example

  • March 2024: Conservatives fined £10,750 for inaccurate and late donation reporting

Strengths

  • Increases transparency

  • Helps regulate spending

Criticisms

  • Fines are small compared to multimillion-pound donations

  • Limited deterrent effect

Debates on state funding

  • State funding refers to political parties receiving money from the public purse to support their operations, policy development and election activity

    • The UK currently uses a limited model called short money

  • This has created debate about whether expanding state funding would make politics fairer and more transparent, or whether it would waste public money and distance parties from voters

Arguments FOR State Funding

Arguments AGAINST State Funding

Reduces influence of big donors

  • Could limit “cash-for-access” concerns

  • E.g., Labour criticised in 2024 for giving Bloomberg (a £150,000 donor) early access to its financial plans

Expensive and low public priority

  • Public money should prioritise frontline services (Labour Party evidence, 1997)

Promotes party pluralism

  • Small parties would have resources to compete

  • E.g., In 2024, Labour & Conservatives spent £7m+, Greens spent under £1m

Could entrench larger parties

  • Successful parties may receive most funding

  • Harder for new or smaller parties to grow

Improves representation

  • MPs rely less on fundraising and more on constituents

  • Committee on Standards: 40% think MPs “very often” act due to donor influence

Unfair to taxpayers

  • Taxpayers would fund parties whose policies they oppose

Greater transparency

  • Regular, predictable state funding reduces scandals

  • Strengthens the Electoral Commission’s regulatory role

Reduced public engagement

  • Parties may engage less with the public if guaranteed funding

Public opinion values the issue

  • Committee on Standards: 82% think party funding is an important issue

Blurs line between party and state

  • Could weaken accountability and damage public trust

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sarra Jenkins

Author: Sarra Jenkins

Expertise: Content Writer

Sarra is a highly experienced A-Level Politics educator with over two decades of teaching and examining experience. She was part of the team that wrote the Edexcel 2017 Politics Specification and currently works as a Senior Examiner. A published author of 14 textbooks and revision guides, her expertise lies in UK and US politics, exam skills, and career guidance. She continues to teach, driven by her passion for this "evolving and dynamic subject".

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.