UK Political Parties in Context (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Sarra Jenkins

Written by: Sarra Jenkins

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

The development of a multi-party system

  • The UK is usually described as having a dominant two-party system at Westminster

    • However, devolution, electoral reform in devolved bodies, and changing voting behaviour have created features of a multi-party system

  • This has consequences for how governments are formed and how parties compete

  • Party success is shaped by factors ranging from leadership and funding to national circumstances and media influence

Party systems in the UK

What is a party system?

  • A party system refers to the number of parties with a realistic chance of forming a government

  • The number of parties that have a chance of forming government is a result of the electoral system chosen

    • Majoritarian and plurality electoral systems generally returning two-party systems

    • Proportional electoral systems generally returning multi-party systems

Types of party systems

One-party system

Two-party system

  • One party has a realistic chance of forming government, with one party dominating for extensive time periods

  • Two parties have a realistic chance of forming a government, and power often changes hands between these two parties

Two-and-a-half party system

Multi-party system

  • Two parties have a realistic chance of forming a government, but a third party may be a coalition partner (although unlikely to gain power alone)

  • Many parties have a realistic chance of forming government or being part of a governing coalition

Arguments the UK is (or remains) a two-party system

  • UK government at Westminster is dominated by Labour and Conservatives and has been for around 100 years

    • Even in 2024, the most disproportionate election ever, Labour and Conservatives gained 57% of the vote but 82% of the seats

  • Labour and Conservative spend considerably more on elections than other parties, spending between 5 and 6 times more each than the Liberal Democrats in 2024

  • Even when minor parties influence policy, these policies are enacted by one of the two major parties, for example Brexit in 2016

  • Labour and Conservative continue to do relatively well in the devolved region elections and in the elections for mayors

Arguments the UK is becoming more of a multi-party system

  • Since 2010: more coalition, minority or small-majority governments

  • Scottish Parliament 2007: Greens (2 seats) held the balance of power between Labour (56) and SNP (57)

  • Northern Ireland: power-sharing since the Good Friday Agreement (1998)

  • Wales: no single-party majority in Senedd elections since 1999; all resulted in coalition or minority governments

Implications of a multi-party system for Government

  • More negotiations and agreements needed to form a government

    • Coalitions, minority governments, confidence-and-supply deals more likely

  • Smaller parties may gain leverage even with few MPs

    • E.g, Greens holding balance of power in Scottish Parliament (2007)

    • E.g, DUP confidence-and-supply deal (2017)

  • Policies may reflect influence of several parties rather than one dominant party

  • Governments can be less stable or shorter-lived

  • Multi-level politics (devolved parliaments) encourages more parties to be viable

Factors affecting party success

  • A range of political, organisational and external factors shape whether parties succeed or fail in UK elections

    • These include leadership, funding, policies, national circumstances and performance in office

    • The media also plays a major role, influencing how parties and leaders are perceived and shaping voter behaviour

  • No single factor guarantees success - different factors matter more or less depending on the political context

Diagram showing factors affecting party success: leadership, policies, funding, performance, media, electoral system, and national circumstances.
Factors affecting party success

Factors affecting party success

Factor

Theory

Example of importance

Example of limited importance

Party leadership

  • A charismatic leader can attract voters

  • 2019: Boris Johnson’s leadership and “Get Brexit Done” message helped Conservative majority

  • 2022: Johnson’s personality did not prevent resignation after Partygate and ministerial resignations

Party funding & resources

  • Money funds campaigns and raises awareness

  • 2024: Labour outspent Conservatives on social media

  • 2024: Liberal Democrats relied on media stunts rather than high spending

Political performance

  • Performance of the incumbent affects voter intent

  • 2024: Labour benefitted from Conservative scandals and instability; 48% voted Labour to “get the Tories out”

  • YouGov 2024: public felt Labour and Conservative policies both “unrealistic” and “unaffordable”

National circumstances

  • Governments rewarded/punished for handling major events

  • 2019: Conservatives’ Brexit campaign helped them win

  • Despite austerity after the financial crash, Conservatives still won successive elections (2010–2024)

Party policies

  • Manifesto policies attract/repel voters

  • 2015: Conservatives included EU referendum to stop losing votes to UKIP

  • In valence issues (broad agreement), policy matters less

Media

  • Media endorsement can shape voter perceptions

  • 2024: The Sun backed Labour for first time since 2005; strong social media use

  • Ofcom 2024: newspaper readership continues to decline; majority use social media for news

Electoral system

  • FPTP favours major parties; PR favours smaller parties

  • 2024: Labour won 34% of votes but 64% of seats

  • 2017: Conservatives won 42% of votes but only 49% of seats; 2015 SNP 4.7% of votes but 9% of seats

Parties and democracy

Parties are good for democracy

  • They:

    • Provide genuine political choice, encouraging participation

    • Allow voters to hold governments accountable

    • Simplify complex issues, improving political education

    • Recruit and train political leaders

    • Organise government and opposition, creating stability

    • Adversary politics ensures scrutiny between elections

Parties are bad for democracy

  • They:

    • Risk becoming narrow elites dominated by wealthy donors

    • Polarisation undermines consensus

    • Reliance on funding raises transparency concerns

    • Whips limit MP independence and local representation

    • Internal factions undermine unity and policy delivery

    • Declining membership suggests weakening public engagement

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sarra Jenkins

Author: Sarra Jenkins

Expertise: Content Writer

Sarra is a highly experienced A-Level Politics educator with over two decades of teaching and examining experience. She was part of the team that wrote the Edexcel 2017 Politics Specification and currently works as a Senior Examiner. A published author of 14 textbooks and revision guides, her expertise lies in UK and US politics, exam skills, and career guidance. She continues to teach, driven by her passion for this "evolving and dynamic subject".

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.