Referendums (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Sarra Jenkins

Written by: Sarra Jenkins

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

How referendums work

  • A referendum is a form of direct democracy in which voters decide on a single specific issue by choosing yes or no

  • Although the government chooses when to hold them, the results are not legally binding, meaning Parliament can choose whether or not to implement the outcome

The referendum process

Flowchart illustrating referendum process: decision, question, campaigning, voting, result announcement, and implementation of choice.

1. The government decides whether to hold a referendum

  • Only the UK government or Parliament can call a referendum

    • There is no legal requirement to use referendums

    • They are held when the government chooses to seek public approval on a major issue

  • Most UK referendums have focused on big constitutional questions, such as devolution or EU membership

2. A single, clear question is set

  • The question is usually written in the form of a yes/no choice to make the vote as clear as possible

  • The Electoral Commission may review and approve the wording to ensure it is understandable and unbiased

3. Voters cast their votes

  • Campaigns supporting each option get underway

    • The 2016 EU referendum featured high profile 'Leave' and 'Remain campaigns

  • All eligible voters receive a ballot paper with the question and the options.

    • Voters simply choose “Yes” or “No”, or relevant equivalents such as Remain/Leave

  • In this way, referendums are much simpler than elections, which involve choosing between many candidates or parties

4. The result is counted and announced

  • Votes are counted across the whole area covered by the referendum (e.g. Scotland, Wales, UK-wide)

  • The option with the majority of votes wins

  • The result is announced, either in Parliament or in the media

5. The outcome is not legally binding

  • Parliament is not required by law to act on the result

  • However, in practice, governments almost always follow the outcome because of the strong political pressure created by a public vote

    • This makes the result politically binding, even if it is not legally enforceable

The use of referendums in the UK

  • Since the late 1990s, referendums have played an important role in settling major constitutional questions across the UK

    • Governments have used them to ask the public directly about issues such as devolution, electoral reform and EU membership

  • Although the results are not legally binding, they carry strong political weight, and in practice they have shaped some of the most significant changes in modern UK politics

Key UK referendums since 1997

Year & Referendum

Question

Turnout & Results

Impact

1997 Scotland

1. Create a Scottish Parliament?

2. Give it tax-varying powers?

60%

1. 74% Yes

2. 64% Yes

  • Led to the creation of the Scottish Parliament

1997 Wales

Create a National Assembly for Wales?

50%

50% Yes

  • Created the Welsh Assembly, later renamed the Senedd / Welsh Parliament

1998 London

Create a Mayor and London Assembly?

35%

72% Yes

  • Established the Greater London Authority with a Mayor and Assembly

1998 Northern Ireland

Accept the Good Friday Agreement?

81%

71% Yes

  • Established power-sharing institutions at Stormont and supported the peace process

2004 North East England

Create an elected regional assembly?

48%

78% No

  • Ended plans for regional assemblies in England

2011 UK

Replace FPTP with AV for the House of Commons?

42%

68% No

  • Maintained FPTP for general elections

2014 Scotland

Should Scotland be independent?

85%

55% No

  • Scotland remained in the UK; prompted further devolution discussions

2016 UK (EU Referendum)

Should the UK remain in or leave the EU?

72%

52% Leave

  • Triggered Brexit, leading to major constitutional, economic and political change

An evaluation of referendums

  • Debates about referendums focus on whether giving the public a direct say strengthens or weakens the UK’s representative democracy

    • Supporters argue that referendums provide legitimacy, boost engagement and help resolve major constitutional issues

    • Critics, however, warn that they can oversimplify complex questions, fuel populism and undermine the role of elected representatives

Arguments in favour of referendums

  • Legitimacy

    • They give strong democratic authority to major constitutional decisions, especially with high turnout and clear results

  • Boost participation

    • They encourage political engagement and increase voter involvement in key national issues

  • Resolve controversies

    • They can settle divisive or long-running debates quickly by giving the final decision to the public

  • Public accountability

    • They make the people clearly responsible for difficult or controversial outcomes

  • Improve political education

    • Campaigns can raise public awareness and understanding of important issues

Arguments against referendums

  • Oversimplification

    • They reduce complex issues to a simple yes/no question, which may not capture the full implications

  • Risk of populism

    • Voters may be influenced by emotional appeals, misinformation or simplistic slogans

  • Undermines representative democracy

    • MPs are elected to make informed decisions, and referendums may weaken their role

  • Majority dominance

    • “Winner takes all” outcomes can ignore or harm minority views

  • Political manipulation

    • Governments can call referendums when it benefits them politically rather than when it benefits the public

  • Non-binding results cause confusion

    • Legally, results can be ignored, but in practice they rarely are, placing governments in difficult positions

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sarra Jenkins

Author: Sarra Jenkins

Expertise: Content Writer

Sarra is a highly experienced A-Level Politics educator with over two decades of teaching and examining experience. She was part of the team that wrote the Edexcel 2017 Politics Specification and currently works as a Senior Examiner. A published author of 14 textbooks and revision guides, her expertise lies in UK and US politics, exam skills, and career guidance. She continues to teach, driven by her passion for this "evolving and dynamic subject".

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.