Parliamentary Privilege & the Role of the Opposition (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Sarra Jenkins

Written by: Sarra Jenkins

Reviewed by: Steve Vorster

Updated on

What is parliamentary privilege?

  • Parliamentary privilege protects MPs and peers from legal action for what they say or do in the course of parliamentary proceedings

  • It amounts to a guarantee of freedom of speech in Parliament

    • MPs and peers can speak openly without fear of prosecution, libel or defamation claims

    • This enables robust scrutiny of the executive and exposure of wrongdoing

Role and significance of parliamentary privilege

  • Allows MPs and peers to raise sensitive or controversial issues

  • Enables Parliament to scrutinise powerful individuals, institutions and the government

  • Supports transparency and accountability

  • Protects Parliament’s ability to hold the executive to account without interference from the courts

  • However, the use of parliamentary privilege can also be controversial, particularly where it conflicts with:

    • court rulings

    • anonymity orders

    • reputational rights

Case Study

Parliamentary Privilege and “Soldier F”

An MP stands before a media microphone, flanked by members of the public
Colum Eastwood MP named "Soldier F" using parliamentary privilege

The context

  • “Soldier F” was a former member of the British Army alleged to have committed murder during the 1972 Bloody Sunday events

  • Courts had previously granted anonymity to “Soldier F”

  • The case formed part of wider debates over accountability for historical crimes committed during the Troubles

Actions taken

  • In July 2021, SDLP leader Colum Eastwood used parliamentary privilege in the House of Commons

  • He publicly named “Soldier F” during parliamentary proceedings

  • This directly contradicted an earlier court direction granting anonymity

Outcome

  • The naming sparked intense political and legal debate

  • It raised questions about:

    • whether legacy cases from the Troubles should continue

    • whether anonymity protections were still appropriate decades later

    • accountability for historical crimes

  • The case demonstrated how parliamentary privilege can override court-imposed restrictions in the interests of scrutiny and accountability

Case Study

Parliamentary Privilege and Russian Oligarchs

Woman wearing glasses and a colourful scarf speaks, seated among others in a formal setting, possibly a legislative or parliamentary session.
Layla Moran MP named Russian oligarchs in the House of Commons in 2022

The context

  • Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, there was increased scrutiny of Russian wealth and influence in the UK

  • Concerns were raised about individuals with close links to the Kremlin operating within the UK economy

Actions taken

  • In February 2022, Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran used parliamentary privilege in the House of Commons

  • She publicly named 35 Russian oligarchs whom she described as “key enablers” of the Kremlin

  • By invoking parliamentary privilege, she was immune from defamation or libel proceedings

Outcome

  • The names entered the official parliamentary record, Hansard

  • Her actions increased political and public pressure on the UK government

  • The case contributed to debate over sanctions and asset freezes

  • It highlighted how parliamentary privilege can be used as a tool for transparency and public interest scrutiny

Evaluation of Parliamentary Privilege

Strengths

Weaknesses

  • Enables fearless scrutiny of the executive and powerful actors

  • Allows MPs to raise issues that could not be raised safely outside Parliament

  • Strengthens Parliament’s role as a forum for accountability

  • Can undermine court rulings and legal protections

  • Risks misuse if applied irresponsibly

  • Raises ethical concerns where individuals are named without due process

The role of the opposition in Parliament

  • The opposition in Parliament could refer to all MPs that are not from the governing party

  • More commonly however, it refers to His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, which is the second largest party in the House of Commons

A group of four people seated at a green table with nameplates, dressed in business attire, in a wood-panelled room with ornate carvings.
Members of the current Shadow Cabinet

Roles of the opposition

  • To provide alternative government, or a ‘government-in-waiting’

  • To hold the government to account through the methods of scrutiny

  • To scrutinise legislation and policy proposed by the government

  • To represent alternative policies that might have favour amongst different parts of the electorate

  • To lead on opposition days

  • To trigger confidence motions if needed

How they carry out roles

  • The Shadow Cabinet offers alternative ministers and policy platforms to those of the government

    • They can also use the media to campaign, set the public agenda and critique the government

  • PMQs and Ministers' Question Time allows the opposition to put ministers on record and highlight their failures

  • Select committees and opposition day debates can necessitate a government response, even if it is not binding

  • They develop their own policy alternatives through manifestos and consultation papers

  • They can use of parliamentary procedures such as urgent questions to scrutinise the government

The influence of the opposition

  • The opposition is vital for democratic accountability

    • It concentrates scrutiny and provides policy alternatives

  • However, its effectiveness depends on resources, unity and media access

  • A strong opposition can shape policy debates but their influence can be limited by large government majorities

Opposition days

  • These are days in the parliamentary timetable when opposition parties choose the topic for debate in the House of Commons, allowing them to challenge and scrutinise the government

    • The opposition is timetabled 20 days per year

Are opposition days effective?

  • Yes - they force the government to respond to opposition priorities and can spotlight issues the government would rather ignore

  • No - these days have limited power, as votes are generally not binding, and are more symbolic than powerful

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Sarra Jenkins

Author: Sarra Jenkins

Expertise: Content Writer

Sarra is a highly experienced A-Level Politics educator with over two decades of teaching and examining experience. She was part of the team that wrote the Edexcel 2017 Politics Specification and currently works as a Senior Examiner. A published author of 14 textbooks and revision guides, her expertise lies in UK and US politics, exam skills, and career guidance. She continues to teach, driven by her passion for this "evolving and dynamic subject".

Steve Vorster

Reviewer: Steve Vorster

Expertise: Economics & Business Subject Lead

Steve has taught A Level, GCSE, IGCSE Business and Economics - as well as IBDP Economics and Business Management. He is an IBDP Examiner and IGCSE textbook author. His students regularly achieve 90-100% in their final exams. Steve has been the Assistant Head of Sixth Form for a school in Devon, and Head of Economics at the world's largest International school in Singapore. He loves to create resources which speed up student learning and are easily accessible by all.