Political Governance: North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) (Edexcel A Level Politics): Revision Note

Exam code: 9PL0

Jane Hirons

Written by: Jane Hirons

Reviewed by: Lisa Eades

Updated on

The significance of NATO

  • The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, like the UN, originated shortly after World War 2 in 1949

    • This was near the beginning of the Cold War which saw the USA and Soviet Union as rivals for global dominance

  • NATO’s aim is collective security, which means that nation states united together are more secure than individual nation states on their own

  • As protection against aggressive actions, Article 5 of NATO states that an attack against one member is an attack against all

  • NATO began with twelve European and North American states who felt threatened by Soviet Russia

NATO's founding member states

Map showing Europe with NATO member countries in blue, including UK, France, and Turkey. The Soviet Union is marked in red.
NATO's founding members in 1949

The significance of NATO

  • NATO, like the UN, is an intergovernmental organisation which sees power in numbers and aims to preserve peace

  • NATO’s original emphasis is on using the threat of a collective force as a deterrent to attack

NATO's changing role

  • Over the years NATO has expanded and now has a membership of 32 nations

  • Its purpose has also changed, particularly after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991

    • "Essentially, NATO not only helps to defend the territory of its members, but also engages – where possible and when necessary – to project its values further afield, prevent and manage crises, stabilise post-conflict situations, and support reconstruction." (Source: Nato website (opens in a new tab))

NATO post-1991

  • The collapse of the Soviet Union, the rise of non-state actors, and Russia’s actions in Ukraine since 2014 have significantly changed the global security environment

  • These developments have led to new security threats, including terrorism and increased state-based conflict

  • NATO responds by strengthening deterrence and defence, managing crises and promoting cooperative security among states

    • It is involved in conflicts and crises, such as natural disasters, even when these do not directly threaten its member states

      • It is also involved in conflict prevention, conflict management and conflict resolution

    • It is no longer confined to the North Atlantic region

  • NATO does not have its own standing army because member states voluntarily contribute soldiers and equipment when required

    • All NATO member states are expected to contribute 2% of their GDP to support NATO operations

    • The United States dominates in terms of financial support

      • This dominance is of concern to some who argue that the USA is really in control of NATO

NATO funding

Chart of NATO defence spending: US $860B, UK $65.8B, Germany $68.1B, France $56.6B, Italy $31.6B, Canada $29B. Other countries shown with smaller values.
Financial contributions to NATO by member country, 2023

Case Study

NATO in Libya

The silhouette of a man against a war-torn landscape, with collapsed buildings and rubble
  • In 2011 the UN Security Council approved resolution 1970, which expressed grave concern over extreme violence and oppression taking place in Libya 

  • As the UN has no armed forces, several state actors and NATO became involved

NATO actions

  • NATO prevented arms from being supplied by sea and took over Libyan airspace

  • They also were responsible for airstrikes which targeted Libyan military but also killed many civilians

  • Later that year, after the leadership of Libya had been defeated, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 2009

    • This established a UN support mission to Libya and supported NATOs action to protect civilians 

The outcome

  • Most would agree that the 2011 humanitarian intervention failed the people of Libya

  • It was left without any form of effective leadership and has experienced extreme political instability and lack of security since 2011

An Evaluation of NATO

Strengths of NATO

Weaknesses of NATO

  • NATO is a powerful organisation with international legitimacy, partly because it often works alongside the United Nations

  • NATO has evolved over time to meet changing global security needs

  • NATO provides pooled resources and collective security for its member states

  • NATO relies heavily on the USA for financial support, which the USA sometimes uses to its advantage but also resents

  • President Trump has threatened to withdraw the USA from NATO on several occasions, and has criticised members that do not meet the requirement to spend 2% of GDP on defence

  • NATO is criticised for overstepping its role in political governance, and some states are suspicious of its motives and its emphasis on Western values

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Jane Hirons

Author: Jane Hirons

Expertise: Content Writer

Jane has been actively involved in all levels of educational endeavors including designing curriculum, teaching and assessment. She has extensive experience as an international classroom teacher and understands the challenges students face when it comes to revision.

Lisa Eades

Reviewer: Lisa Eades

Expertise: Business Content Creator

Lisa has taught A Level, GCSE, BTEC and IBDP Business for over 20 years and is a senior Examiner for Edexcel. Lisa has been a successful Head of Department in Kent and has offered private Business tuition to students across the UK. Lisa loves to create imaginative and accessible resources which engage learners and build their passion for the subject.