Norms (DP IB Global Politics): Revision Note
Shared expectations in the global community
Norms are widely accepted standards of behaviour for states and non-state actors
There is usually some kind of morality embedded in norms
Norms can be found at all levels, but global norms are established by global actors and institutions and refer to values that include:
Respecting human rights
Preventing conflict
Promoting economic and social development
Protecting the environment
Democracy
The concept of global norms is closely linked to liberalism, and is based on the idea that we live in an interconnected and interdependent world in which we must share the same norms and values to live peacefully and sustainably
Norms that regulate
Some argue that norms are more effective than laws in regulating behaviour because actors are persuaded rather than forced to accept them
Many norms reflect values seen in multiple religions and cultures
Norms are drawn from accepted rules of behaviour which promote peace and stability, such as not doing harm to others
Norms can regulate behaviour because states and other actors do not operate in isolation and care about what others think of them
In breaking norms state actors risk condemnation from other actors, which could have serious economic and political consequences
Democracy as a global norm
One global norm is that democracy, though not perfect, is the best form of government because citizens have agency
Some states may represent themselves as democratic so that they seem to conform to this global norm even if, in practice, they are a single-party state
The NGO Freedom House singles out several states in Eastern Europe which claim to be democratic but seem to be moving away from democracy, including
Poland
Hungary
Serbia
Montenegro
Liberalism may argue that this example shows that a respect for democracy is a global norm
If democracy were not so widely accepted as a global norm, states would not put effort into pretending to be more democratic than they are
However, realism would argue that this example proves that global norms don’t exist and states' behaviours cannot be regulated
Shifting global norms
Global norms are not fixed or permanent
In recent years there have been shifts in global norms as states challenge or openly ignore accepted norms about preserving peace and security
Examples include:
Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine in 2022
The USA’s threats against Greenland, Cuba and Venezuela
Israel’s genocide of Palestinians
IGOs, once widely accepted as the best way to work together to resolve political issues and promote economic development, are becoming increasingly challenged
Examples include:
The UK leaving the EU in 2020
Widespread criticism of the UN’s inability to resolve multiple crises
Shifting norms about the responsibility of the state
Norm | How this has shifted | Have norms really shifted? |
|---|---|---|
The state has complete control over what happens within their borders |
|
|
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?