Syllabus Edition

First teaching 2025

First exams 2027

Answering ERQs - Paper 1 (DP IB Psychology): Revision Note

Claire Neeson

Written by: Claire Neeson

Reviewed by: Raj Bonsor

Updated on

Answering ERQs – paper 1

  • Section C consists of two optional extended response questions (ERQs) from two of the four contexts

    • Health and wellbeing

    • Human development

    • Human relationships

    • Learning and cognition

  • The questions are concept-based and so are framed around themes such as:

    • bias

    • causality

    • change

    • measurement

    • perspective

    • responsibility

  • Each ERQs is worth 15 marks

    • The total for Section C is 15 marks, as you only answer one ERQ

  • The examiners are looking for:

    • how well you show breadth and depth of knowledge, using studies and theory

    • how well you provide a balanced evaluation (strengths, limitations, counterarguments, applications)

    • a clear structure, e.g.,

      • Introduction

      • AO1: theory/evidence

      • AO3: evaluation (strengths and limitations)

      • Conclusion

Command terms (AO1 and AO3)

  • The command terms used in Section C include:

    • Describe (AO1)

    • State (AO1)

    • Compare and contrast (AO3)

    • Discuss (AO3)

    • Evaluate (AO3)

    • Examine (AO3)

    • To what extent (AO3)

Example question

  • In the context of human relationships, evaluate the role of bias in Social Identity Theory [15 marks]

How to answer 'Evaluate' questions

  • If you are asked to evaluate, you should:

    • weigh up the strengths and limitations of one or more relevant theories, methods, or strategies

      • e.g., “measuring attachment behaviours is fraught with difficulties from the outset”

    • provide examples of methods/strategies

      • e.g., “Ainsworth’s Strange Situation (1970) uses a controlled observation with behavioural categories”

    • present strengths with expansion and explanation

      • e.g., “a strength of a controlled observation is its standardised procedure; this increases replicability and reliability”

    • present limitations with expansion and explanation

      • e.g., “a limitation is the artificial setting, which reduces ecological validity”

How to answer 'Discuss' questions

  • If you are asked to discuss, you should:

    • offer a balanced and considered review of the topic by presenting more than one viewpoint, explanation, or factor

      • e.g., “psychological treatments such as CBT can promote change, but their effectiveness depends on motivation and context”

    • present an argument supported by evidence

      • e.g., “research by March et al. (2007) suggests CBT is effective for depression, particularly when combined with medication”

    • Show that behaviour or outcomes are not explained by a single factor but by interacting influences

      • e.g., “change in behaviour may depend on cognitive factors, biological processes, and social support”

    • Include both strengths and limitations

      • e.g., “CBT promotes long-term coping skills; however, high drop-out rates suggest resistance to change for some individuals”

    • Link ideas together; don't just list them

      • Use connective phrases to show how points relate, such as "however", "therefore", and "this suggests"

Examiner Tips and Tricks

In Section C on Paper 1, marks are awarded for thinking like a psychologist — defining concepts, applying them thoughtfully, and critically evaluating evidence across different contexts.

Below are some tips to help you succeed in the 15-mark question:

  • Define the concept first

    • Start with a clear definition of the key concept (e.g., change, bias, causality), not a study description

  • Use studies as support

    • Refer to research briefly to show evidence, focusing on what it demonstrates about the concept

  • Make links explicit

    • Clearly explain how the concept applies to the theory or research—don’t assume it is obvious

  • Show complexity

    • Discuss more than one perspective, such as strengths and limitations or different explanations

  • Explain how concepts interact

    • Show how ideas work together (e.g. change and motivation, bias and measurement)

  • Evaluate, don’t just describe

    • Include discussion of effectiveness, limitations, ethics, culture, or real-world use

  • End with a reasoned conclusion

    • Weigh the evidence and directly answer how useful the concept is

  • Be flexible

    • Apply knowledge to the question rather than relying on memorised essays

  • Focus on quality

    • Clear, well-structured arguments score higher than long, unfocused answers

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Claire Neeson

Author: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.

Raj Bonsor

Reviewer: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.