Pre-release materials 2026: South Lincs Reservoir Different Perspectives (AQA GCSE Geography): Revision Note

Exam code: 8035

Bridgette Barrett

Written by: Bridgette Barrett

Reviewed by: Jacque Cartwright

Updated on

Different perspectives on the South Lincs reservoir project

  • There are several different stakeholder views on the proposed development of a reservoir in South Lincs, including:

    • Anglian Water

    • Farmers

    • Local residents in Helpringham and Scredington

    • Local businesses

    • Local MP

    • NFU

  • Each of these groups is either for or against the development

Anglian Water

  • Anglian Water supports the development, as they were the organisation to propose it

  • They argue that the development will:

    • Play a critical role in future water provision

    • Ensure the area's resilience during future droughts

    • Reduce the amount of water taken from chalk streams and groundwater aquifers

    • Provide wider opportunities

"Together with its associated water infrastructure, the reservoir will create a much-needed new water resource."

"The reservoir also presents significant social, economic and environmental opportunities. We’re planning to include features that local communities would value and use."

"If we do not put this investment in, in the way that we did with Grafham and Rutland in the 1960s and 70s, many people will simply not have the water in future decades to farm and to use in homes. "

Head of Supply and Demand Strategy, Anglian Water

Local farmers

  • Farmers have expressed concerns over the:

    • Loss of working farms

    • Loss of productive farmland

    • Risk of flooding in the area

    • Mental health and well-being of the people affected

"Your whole world just falls to pieces. We have hardly slept. To lose your homes and your farm... it's all your hopes and dreams.

"We are setting up a life for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. It's all about leaving a legacy.

"We are talking about 4,500 acres of prime growing land. There are 58 homes affected."

“There is so much more to this than meets the eye, and the massive construction and land-moving effort will give it a huge carbon footprint. Among other things, the uncertainty this has delivered is already affecting people’s mental health.”

Local farmers

Other local residents

  • Over 2000 residents have signed a petition against the reservoir development

  • They are concerned about the:

    • Loss of over 50 homes

    • Negative impacts on businesses and employment

    • Road closures and increased traffic

“Our house is on the market, but all of the fear-mongering around the reservoir means it might never sell, and we could be stuck here.

“I know of one lady who hasn’t had any viewings since the reservoir was announced."

“We moved into the village two years ago and have spent a lot of money doing our house up – will that value be wiped off?"

“Of course it could bring muck and noise, but in the long run it could also be a big asset to the area. It’s hard to be sure at this point."

“Many more livelihoods will be destroyed or severely inconvenienced by the associated infrastructure and disruption during construction."

Views of local residents

Riding school

  • Local businesses are concerned about the impact of construction

“This is my dream I’ve poured my heart and soul into – to say I’m devastated doesn’t even scratch the surface,” the mum-of-four said. “I was hoping to invest in my business next year, but all that will be on hold for four years.”

Riding school owner

Local MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham

“Many of my constituents living within the Scredington, Helpringham, Burton, Spanby and Swaton communities will be incredibly concerned. People are understandably distressed about what these proposals, should they go ahead, mean for their homes and livelihoods, with this area being home to many local farmers in particular.”

Local Member of Parliament

National Farmers' Union (NFU)

  • The NFU (opens in a new tab)supports the expansion of water infrastructure to address climate change and population increase

  • However, they highlight that large-scale reservoirs can harm local communities and farms

“Such major schemes can have significant adverse impacts on farm businesses and the people involved. It’s vital that the design and implementation during construction be carried out in a way that minimises the impact on land ownership and farming operations.

“We will be working to support any members affected by these schemes and to ensure that agricultural water needs are recognised as an explicit part of future resource use plans.”

Deputy President of the National Farmers' Union

Examiner Tips and Tricks

It is important that when you are examining an issue, you consider a range of different viewpoints from stakeholders. Ensure that you have knowledge and understanding of some of the key stakeholders in the South Lincs reservoir development.

Arguments for and against the South Lincs reservoir

Background

  • Water consumption in the UK is high, averaging 140 litres per person per day

  • The East of England has low precipitation levels (around 600mm annually) and an increasing population

  • Climate change means that precipitation levels may fall and become more unpredictable

Arguments for the South Lincs reservoir

Water security

  • With decreasing rainfall and increasing population, the reservoir would help to improve water security in the area

  • It would reduce the level of water stress in the region

  • The project has been designated as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP), which means it is regarded as crucial to the water supply in the area

Environmental benefits

  • The new reservoir would reduce the amount of water which Anglian Water takes (abstraction) from rivers and aquifers

  • The site will provide new wetland and woodland habitats

  • Improved public transport and paths to reduce car use

  • Inclusion of renewable energy sources

Social benefits

  • The site features a range of leisure facilities and activities, which will be beneficial for the health and well-being of the local community

Economic benefits

  • The site will attract tourists, which will boost the local economy and benefit local businesses

    • Existing reservoirs such as Rutland Water and Grafham Water attract a total of two million people each year

  • The new reservoir will create jobs

  • The building of the reservoir will allow more housing to be built

    • Additional housing construction is currently blocked due to concerns about the water supply

  • Guaranteed water supply for agriculture

Arguments against the South Lincs reservoir

Environmental

  • There will be a landscape and visual impact

    • The embankments, which are planned to be over 20m high, will stand out in the flat surrounding landscape

  • Destruction of habitats and ecosystems when areas are flooded

Social

  • Over 50 homes will be lost

    • Compulsory purchase of homes means people will have to leave an area where their family may have lived for generations

  • Impact on people's mental health caused by uncertainty about whether the project will go ahead

  • Disruption caused during construction

    • Additional traffic will lead to congestion and increased travel times for local people

Economic

  • Loss of working farms and productive farmland (over 4500 acres)

  • Impact on businesses that may have to close, such as the riding stables

  • Decrease in property values

  • Water sustainability could be increased more cheaply by:

    • Fixing leaks – Anglian Water lost around 182 million litres a day (Source: Anglian Water) this is more than the new reservoir will provide each day

    • Reducing waste

    • Small-scale projects

  • Increase in water bills to help fund the project

Examiner Tips and Tricks

It is important that when you are examining an issue, you consider a range of different viewpoints from stakeholders. Ensure that you have knowledge and understanding of some of the key stakeholders in the reservoir development.

Summary

  • The UK faces increasing water security issues

  • The demand for water is predicted to rise over the coming years, particularly in the south and east, where the supply of water is lowest

  • The government is committed to reducing average annual water consumption and improving water quality

  • Although water recycling and prevention of leaks will play a significant role in achieving water sustainability, large water transfer and reservoir projects will be needed to meet the future demand

The future

  • Two phases of consultation are now complete

    • Future consultations are planned for 2026 and 2027

  • In May 2025, the government designated the South Lincs reservoir as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP)

    • This means that the planning process is now with the Secretary of State rather than the local authority

    • This aims to ensure that the process happens more quickly

  • Construction is expected to start in 2031

Examiner Tips and Tricks

You will be asked to decide on the issue in the last question. This issue could centre around several possible points, such as:

  • Whether the possible harm to a region is justified because of the UK's water supply issue

  • Is the reservoir sustainable? Sustainability in the economy, society, and environment must all be taken into account

  • Whether the reservoir development should go ahead or not

Which information from the resource booklet would support the decision not to go ahead? and why? Which stakeholders would agree with this decision?

  • These will be mostly social and environmental factors

  • Stakeholders such as the farmers and

What are the environmental, economic and social benefits that mean the development should go ahead? And why?

  • Stakeholders with this view may be local people wanting improved facilities, water companies, and

Make sure that you reach a conclusion that summarises your main points and reinforces your decision.

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Bridgette Barrett

Author: Bridgette Barrett

Expertise: Geography, History, Religious Studies & Environmental Studies Subject Lead

After graduating with a degree in Geography, Bridgette completed a PGCE over 30 years ago. She later gained an MA Learning, Technology and Education from the University of Nottingham focussing on online learning. At a time when the study of geography has never been more important, Bridgette is passionate about creating content which supports students in achieving their potential in geography and builds their confidence.

Jacque Cartwright

Reviewer: Jacque Cartwright

Expertise: Geography Content Creator

Jacque graduated from the Open University with a BSc in Environmental Science and Geography before doing her PGCE with the University of St David’s, Swansea. Teaching is her passion and has taught across a wide range of specifications – GCSE/IGCSE and IB but particularly loves teaching the A-level Geography. For the past 5 years Jacque has been teaching online for international schools, and she knows what is needed to get the top scores on those pesky geography exams.