How to answer a 8 mark question (WJEC Eduqas GCSE Geography B): Revision Note
Exam code: C112
Answering an 8-mark question
These questions are usually about Assessment Objective 3 (AO3)
This means you need to act like a geographical judge, weighing up evidence before giving a final, confident verdict
To gain high marks in the 8-mark questions, you need to deliver a detailed, structured, and balanced argument
What an 8-mark question needs
The main goal of an 8-mark question is to analyse information, apply your wider geographical knowledge, and reach a justified conclusion
What it asks for | Why it matters |
|---|---|
Analysis | Breaking down the arguments (pros and cons). |
Synthesis | Drawing links between the given resources and your own studies. |
Balance | Discussing points for and against the statement in the question. |
Justification | Giving a clear, supported, final decision or view. |
Your 4-step strategy for success
To access the higher bands (Band 3 or 4, worth 5–8 marks), you must focus on structure and depth of reasoning
Step 1: Understand the command word
The 8-mark question will usually feature one of these important command words:
Analyse: This means explaining the advantages and disadvantages, or causes and consequences, using detailed, connected points
Justify your views: You must discuss arguments both for and against the statement, then give a reason for your view
How far do you agree? is a classic evaluation question
You need to explain why you might agree and why you might disagree before coming to a decision
Make sure your whole answer addresses the specific question asked and doesn't just describe the topic in general
Step 2: Build chains of reasoning
In high-tariff questions, the examiner isn't looking for a list of simple facts; they want connected ideas called 'chains of reasoning'
This is essential for accessing Band 3 and 4 marks
Go deep, not wide; instead of making four basic points, aim for two or three highly developed points
Link your ideas: Use linking phrases like 'which means that', 'leading to', or 'consequently'
Use resources as evidence, not answers: If you are given facts, use them as a 'stepping off point' to develop your arguments; don't just copy the text (this is called 'lifting'), which will limit you to the lower bands
Example of a chain of reasoning:
The cost of investment for the project is very high (A). This means the local government must raise taxes or borrow money internationally (B). As a result, this increases the national debt and slows down long-term development in other areas (C)
Step 3: Write a balanced answer(for and against)
To show a 'balanced and coherent evaluation', structure the middle of your answer into two clear sections:
Arguments for, advantages, agreement:
Use evidence from the resources and your own wider geographical knowledge to support the statement
Arguments against, disadvantages, or disagreement:
Use evidence to argue against the statement or propose alternatives
By including both sides, you demonstrate a wider understanding of the issue, which is key to reaching Bands 3 and 4
Step 4: Write a strong, justified conclusion
This is perhaps the most important part of scoring highly!
You need to end with a clear statement that fully backs up the view you came to, bringing together all of your previous points
Avoid simple statements: Do not simply say, 'I agree' or 'I think soft engineering is best'
Justify: Use phrases like 'On balance, I strongly agree because the long-term economic benefits (as shown by my argument about the multiplier effect) outweigh the short-term social costs'
Link back to the question: If the question refers to 'sustainability' or 'different groups of people', your conclusion needs to make reference to those ideas in order to show thorough application
Checklist for an 8-mark question
Use this quick checklist right before and after you write your response:
Did I address the command word (analyse/justify/agree)?
Did I discuss both sides (arguments for and against)?
Did I develop my points into detailed chains of reasoning?
Did I use specific evidence (names, facts, numbers) from the resources or my studies?
Did I provide a clear, reasoned, and justified conclusion?
Did I avoid simply copying sentences from the provided resources?
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?