Martin Luther King's Campaign in Chicago, 1966 (Edexcel GCSE History): Revision Note
Exam code: 1HI0
Summary
Racist and discriminatory laws in the South had been the focus of the civil rights movement in the 1950s and early 60s. However, in 1966, Martin Luther King decided to bring attention to the more informal economic discrimination of the North. King believed economic discrimination ensured Black Americans lived in worse housing, suffered higher unemployment rates and had lower standards of living than White Americans. His campaign in Chicago gained publicity but made very little progress in improving the lives of Black Americans living in Chicago.
The Chicago Real Estate Board & Segregated Housing
The city of Chicago is in the North and its Black residents had not been subject to ‘Jim Crow’ laws
However, Chicago’s housing was highly segregated along racial lines
Legal covenants preventing homeowners from selling to Black Americans had been very common in Chicago but were declared illegal by the Supreme Court in 1948
This did not stop segregation of housing from continuing into the 1960s due to banks refusing to give mortgages to Black Americans
This prevented houses in ‘Black areas’ from being bought or sold
The prices charged for houses were often higher for Black Americans to prevent them from moving to an area
This meant Black Americans in Chicago had no choice but to live in ‘Black areas’ that were rundown, deprived and overcrowded slums or ghettos
This kind of informal, economic discrimination was to be the next target of Martin Luther King’s campaigning
The Chicago Freedom Movement & King’s campaign
In the mid-1960s, Martin Luther King and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) decided to change the focus and the geographical location of their campaigning
Up to this point, their focus has been overturning racist laws and law enforcement in the South
They now decided to campaign for ‘economic freedom’ for Black Americans in the Northern states
Although Black Americans had the right to vote and were not subject to discriminatory laws in the Northern states, King argued they did not enjoy the same level of freedom as White Americans
A quote from a speech by Martin Luther King.
“It is much easier to integrate lunch counters than it is to eradicate slums. It’s much easier to guarantee the right to vote than it is to guarantee an annual minimum income and create jobs”
In January 1966, the segregated housing of Chicago became the focus of King’s campaign in the North and he established the Chicago Freedom Movement
He was keen to show that his non-violent approach could be effective in the North even after riots had broken out all across America
He believed that Chicago was the ideal place for his new campaign because around a quarter of its 4 million population was Black, living in slums and suffering high rates of unemployment
Impact of the campaign in Chicago
King’s tactics of peaceful marches did achieve some successes
These included:
Attracting publicity to the discrimination in Northern cities
Improving access to mortgages for Black Americans
Securing a $4 million federal grant for the SCLC to improve housing in Chicago
Getting the Mayor of Chicago to agree to discussions over housing
However, King’s demands for the redistribution of wealth and an increase in taxes were deeply unpopular with many White Americans
Many saw his campaign as being less about civil rights and more about introducing communist ideas
King was hit by a brick thrown from the crowd on one march and he was shocked by the level of anger shown by many White Americans in Chicago
When King left Chicago at the end of 1966, many people believed he had made things worse for Black people living in the city
King and his supporters were labelled as ‘professional agitators’, accused of stirring up trouble and being at least partially responsible for the riot that broke out in Chicago in July 1966
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In this paper, you may be asked a question that centres around King’s effectiveness as a leader. You will have to use your knowledge about his actions in Montgomery, Birmingham and Selma to argue that he was both inspirational and effective. Your knowledge about his campaign in Chicago can be used to make an argument that he wasn’t always effective. And remember, you always have to include a conclusion where you explain which side of the argument you believe and why you believe it.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?