Cartels (Cambridge (CIE) A Level Economics): Revision Note
Exam code: 9708
Conditions for cartels
A cartel is formed when firms engage in collusive behaviour, cooperating to fix prices and restrict output
They cease to compete as vigorously as they can
The incentive to collude in these markets is high
A collusive oligopoly

Diagram analysis
Five firms meet secretly and agree to fix prices at a particular level
The five firms present in the market as a single firm
The firm produces at the profit maximisation level of output, where MC = MR (Q1)
At this level, AR (P1) > AC (C1)
The cartel is making higher levels of supernormal profit
A cartel is the most restrictive form of collusion and is illegal in most countries
The consequences of overt collusion include:
Higher prices for consumers
Less output in the market
Poor quality products and/or customer service
Less investment in innovation
Overt collusion often happens in the following ways:
Price fixing
Setting output quotas, which limit supply and naturally result in price increases
Agreements to block new firms from entering the industry
Conditions for an effective cartel
Small number of firms in the market
Fewer firms makes monitoring and enforcing agreements easier
Large numbers of firms increase the incentive to cheat
High barriers to entry
New firms find it difficult to enter the market, reducing the threat of competition and helping existing cartel members maintain control
Price stability among members
Members must resist the temptation to undercut each other. A price war—where one firm lowers prices to gain market share—can quickly unravel the cartel
Similar cost structures
If all members have similar production costs, they benefit equally from the agreed price. Large cost differences can lead to dissatisfaction and defection
Presence of a dominant firm
A strong leader within the cartel can enforce discipline, coordinate actions, and deter cheating among members
Legal environment that tolerates cartels
In regions like the EU and USA, cartels are illegal because they restrict competition and harm consumers. Legal enforcement can dismantle cartels quickly
Case Study
Context
Between 1997 and 2011, several major truck manufacturers in Europe formed a cartel to coordinate prices for medium and heavy trucks. The firms involved included MAN, Volvo/Renault, Daimler (Mercedes-Benz), Iveco and DAF. Together these companies controlled around 90% of the European truck market

Collusive behaviour
The firms secretly agreed to fix truck prices and coordinate the timing of price increases. Senior managers communicated regularly to share pricing information and avoid competing aggressively
Outcome
In 2016, the European Commission fined the companies €2.93 billion, one of the largest cartel fines ever issued. The cartel resulted in higher prices for transport firms and reduced competition across the European truck market
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?