Childbearing (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Changing patterns of childbearing
- Patterns of childbearing have changed: - Rise in births outside marriage - 51.4% of children were born outside of marriage in 2022, compared to only 20% in 1986 
- 36.5% of all births were registered to cohabiting parents in 2021 (ONS, 2023) 
 
- Later motherhood - Women are having their first child later than previous generations 
- Between 1971 and 2012, the average age of first-time mothers increased by 4 years, from 24.7 to 28.1 years 
- In 2021, the average age for giving birth rose to 30.9 years 
 
- Fewer children per woman - Fertility rates have declined since the 20th century 
- The average number of children per woman fell from 2.95 in 1964 to 1.63 in 2001, before slightly rising to 1.94 in 2010 
- In 2023, the fertility rate dropped again to 1.44 children per woman 
 
- Childlessness - Increasing numbers of women remain childless 
- 1941 cohort: 17.9% of women were childless at age 30 
- 1990 cohort: 50.1% of women were childless at age 30 
- This reflects a growing trend of voluntary childlessness among more recent generations 
 
 
Reasons for changes in childbearing
- Decline in stigma and rise in cohabitation - Having children outside marriage is no longer heavily stigmatised 
- In 1989, 70% of people believed couples should marry before having children, but this dropped to 42% by 2012 
- Cohabitation is increasingly viewed as a valid and socially accepted alternative to marriage 
 
- Women prioritising careers and education - Many women delay childbearing to focus on higher education and building careers 
- This shift highlights changes in gender roles and greater female financial independence 
 
- Smaller family sizes - Couples are opting for fewer children due to the high cost of raising a family and lifestyle choices 
- According to The Times (2024), the average cost of raising a child to age 18 in the UK is £223,256, including housing and childcare 
 
- Secularisation - Decline in religious influence has weakened the view that marriage and childbearing must be linked 
- Premarital sex is no longer considered ‘sinful’, reflecting broader cultural shifts 
 
Sociological perspectives
- Functionalist perspective - Functionalists argue that while the structure of families is changing, the function of raising and socialising children remains central 
- They see delayed childbearing and smaller family sizes as rational adaptations to modern economic demands 
 
- Feminist perspective - Feminists view delayed childbearing as empowering for women, allowing them to achieve independence and career success 
- They see reduced pressure to marry and have children as a positive shift away from patriarchal expectations 
 
- Postmodern and personal life perspectives - These perspectives highlight individual choice and diversity, arguing that childbearing decisions are shaped by personal goals, lifestyle preferences, and changing social norms rather than fixed traditions 
 
Lone-parent families
- A lone-parent family is where one parent lives with their child or children without a partner present 
- Most are matriarchal, meaning they are headed by the mother, a trend seen in many black families 
- Trends in lone-parent families are shifting - 16% of all families in 2023 were lone-parent families 
- In 2023, 85% of lone-parent families were headed by a mother 
- Children living with a lone parent are twice as likely to be in poverty compared to those living with two parents 
 
Reasons for changes in lone-parent families
- Increase in divorce and separation - Divorce and separation are the leading causes of lone-parent families 
- More recently, the number of never-married women having children has also increased 
 - Decline in stigma - The stigma once attached to having children outside marriage has significantly declined 
- In the past, lone-parent families often arose due to the death of a parent, but this is now far less common 
 - Female-headed households - Women are often seen as more suited to the expressive or nurturing role, making them more likely to receive custody in divorce cases 
- Men are generally less willing to give up work to raise children 
- Social expectations and the belief in maternal responsibility reinforce this trend 
 - Single by choice - Some women choose to have and raise children without a partner 
- Cashmore (1985) found that some working-class mothers, particularly those with limited earning power, opted to live on benefits rather than with a partner who might offer little support 
- Women may also choose lone parenthood to limit the father’s involvement due to personal preference or concerns over the relationship 
 
Sociological perspectives
- New Right perspective - Murray (1984) argues that the rise in lone-parent families is due to an over-generous welfare state, which he claims rewards 'irresponsible' behaviour, such as having children outside marriage 
- Welfare creates a 'perverse incentive' by encouraging single parenthood and a dependency culture, where individuals rely on benefits instead of supporting themselves 
- The New Right believes reducing welfare benefits would restore the traditional nuclear family and reduce lone parenthood 
 
- Feminist critique of the New Right - Feminists argue the New Right blames women rather than recognising the failure of many men to provide financial or emotional support 
- Welfare benefits are not overly generous—most single mothers are in low-paid jobs or seeking work 
- Lone-parent poverty is the result of patriarchal structures and gender inequalities in the labour market, such as the gender pay gap and lack of affordable childcare 
- Feminists view lone-parent families as evidence of women’s independence, as they are no longer forced to remain in unhappy or abusive relationships 
 
- Marxist Feminist view - Marxist feminists link lone-parent poverty to capitalism, which exploits women both in the workforce and at home 
- The state often uses welfare to maintain low-wage labour markets, rather than to support women’s independence 
 
- Personal Life perspective - From this view, lone-parent families should not be seen as “broken” families 
- What matters most is the quality of relationships and emotional bonds, not whether there is one or two parents 
 
Stepfamilies
- Stepfamilies (reconstituted or blended families) are formed when one or both partners bring children from previous relationships into a new family unit 
- Most arise as a result of re-partnering after divorce or separation 
- Trends in stepfamilies have changed - In 2021, 8.8% of dependent children lived in stepfamilies, compared to 9.7% in 2011 
- 85% of stepfamilies include at least one child from the mother’s previous relationship 
- 11% have a child from the father’s previous relationship 
- 4% include children from both partners’ previous relationships 
- Stepfamilies often face specific challenges, such as: - A higher risk of poverty due to financial responsibilities for children from multiple households 
- Divided loyalties, which can cause emotional tension and adjustment issues 
 
 
Reasons for changes in stepfamilies
- Link to divorce and lone-parent families - Stepfamilies typically form when lone parents enter new relationships 
- Therefore, factors leading to a rise in divorce, separation, and lone parenthood—such as reduced stigma and increased cohabitation—also contribute to the growth of stepfamilies 
 
- Children likely to remain with mother - Following separation or divorce, children are far more likely to live with their mothers 
- This explains why the majority of stepfamilies involve children from the mother’s previous relationship 
 
- Risk of poverty - Financial strain is common, as stepfathers or stepmothers may need to support both their biological children and stepchildren 
- The costs of maintaining multiple households further increase economic pressure 
 
- Tensions within stepfamilies - A lack of clear social norms about roles and responsibilities in stepfamilies can create conflict 
- Issues of loyalty may arise, particularly when children maintain strong attachments to their non-resident biological parent 
 
Sociological perspectives
- Functionalist perspective - Functionalists argue that stepfamilies, like nuclear families, fulfil essential roles such as socialisation and emotional support 
- However, they may face greater challenges adapting to complex family dynamics 
 
- New Right perspective - New Right theorists are often critical of stepfamilies, linking them to family breakdown 
- They claim they are less stable than nuclear families due to divided roles and responsibilities 
 
- Feminist perspective - Feminists highlight that stepfamilies can place an additional domestic and emotional burden on women, as they are often expected to care for both biological and stepchildren 
- They also argue that stepfamilies challenge traditional patriarchal family structures by creating more diverse and negotiated roles 
 
- Personal life perspective - From this perspective, what matters most is the quality of relationships rather than biological ties 
- Stepfamilies can provide strong bonds and support networks when relationships are based on emotional connection and cooperation 
 
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?

