Childbearing (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Changing patterns of childbearing
Patterns of childbearing have changed:
Rise in births outside marriage
51.4% of children were born outside of marriage in 2022, compared to only 20% in 1986
36.5% of all births were registered to cohabiting parents in 2021 (ONS, 2023)
Later motherhood
Women are having their first child later than previous generations
Between 1971 and 2012, the average age of first-time mothers increased by 4 years, from 24.7 to 28.1 years
In 2021, the average age for giving birth rose to 30.9 years
Fewer children per woman
Fertility rates have declined since the 20th century
The average number of children per woman fell from 2.95 in 1964 to 1.63 in 2001, before slightly rising to 1.94 in 2010
In 2023, the fertility rate dropped again to 1.44 children per woman
Childlessness
Increasing numbers of women remain childless
1941 cohort: 17.9% of women were childless at age 30
1990 cohort: 50.1% of women were childless at age 30
This reflects a growing trend of voluntary childlessness among more recent generations
Reasons for changes in childbearing
Decline in stigma and rise in cohabitation
Having children outside marriage is no longer heavily stigmatised
In 1989, 70% of people believed couples should marry before having children, but this dropped to 42% by 2012
Cohabitation is increasingly viewed as a valid and socially accepted alternative to marriage
Women prioritising careers and education
Many women delay childbearing to focus on higher education and building careers
This shift highlights changes in gender roles and greater female financial independence
Smaller family sizes
Couples are opting for fewer children due to the high cost of raising a family and lifestyle choices
According to The Times (2024) (opens in a new tab), the average cost of raising a child to age 18 in the UK is £223,256, including housing and childcare
Secularisation
Decline in religious influence has weakened the view that marriage and childbearing must be linked
Premarital sex is no longer considered ‘sinful’, reflecting broader cultural shifts
Sociological perspectives
Functionalist perspective
Functionalists argue that while the structure of families is changing, the function of raising and socialising children remains central
They see delayed childbearing and smaller family sizes as rational adaptations to modern economic demands
Feminist perspective
Feminists view delayed childbearing as empowering for women, allowing them to achieve independence and career success
They see reduced pressure to marry and have children as a positive shift away from patriarchal expectations
Postmodern and personal life perspectives
These perspectives highlight individual choice and diversity, arguing that childbearing decisions are shaped by personal goals, lifestyle preferences, and changing social norms rather than fixed traditions
Lone-parent families
A lone-parent family is where one parent lives with their child or children without a partner present
Most are matriarchal, meaning they are headed by the mother, a trend seen in black families (opens in a new tab)
Trends in lone-parent families are shifting
16% of all families in 2023 were lone-parent families
In 2023, 85% of lone-parent families were headed by a mother
Children living with a lone parent are twice as likely to be in poverty compared to those living with two parents
Reasons for changes in lone-parent families
Increase in divorce and separation
Divorce and separation are the leading causes of lone-parent families
More recently, the number of never-married women having children has also increased
Decline in stigma
The stigma once attached to having children outside marriage has significantly declined
In the past, lone-parent families often arose due to the death of a parent, but this is now far less common
Female-headed households
Women are often seen as more suited to the expressive or nurturing role, making them more likely to receive custody in divorce cases
Men are generally less willing to give up work to raise children
Social expectations and the belief in maternal responsibility reinforce this trend
Single by choice
Some women choose to have and raise children without a partner
Cashmore (1985) found that some working-class mothers, particularly those with limited earning power, opted to live on benefits rather than with a partner who might offer little support
Women may also choose lone parenthood to limit the father’s involvement due to personal preference or concerns over the relationship
Sociological perspectives
New Right perspective
Murray (1984) argues that the rise in lone-parent families is due to an over-generous welfare state, which he claims rewards 'irresponsible' behaviour, such as having children outside marriage
Welfare creates a 'perverse incentive' by encouraging single parenthood and a dependency culture, where individuals rely on benefits instead of supporting themselves
The New Right believes reducing welfare benefits would restore the traditional nuclear family and reduce lone parenthood
Feminist critique of the New Right
Feminists argue the New Right blames women rather than recognising the failure of many men to provide financial or emotional support
Welfare benefits are not overly generous—most single mothers are in low-paid jobs or seeking work
Lone-parent poverty is the result of patriarchal structures and gender inequalities in the labour market, such as the gender pay gap and lack of affordable childcare
Feminists view lone-parent families as evidence of women’s independence, as they are no longer forced to remain in unhappy or abusive relationships
Marxist Feminist view
Marxist feminists link lone-parent poverty to capitalism, which exploits women both in the workforce and at home
The state often uses welfare to maintain low-wage labour markets, rather than to support women’s independence
Personal Life perspective
From this view, lone-parent families should not be seen as “broken” families
What matters most is the quality of relationships and emotional bonds, not whether there is one or two parents
Stepfamilies
Stepfamilies (reconstituted or blended families) are formed when one or both partners bring children from previous relationships into a new family unit
Most arise as a result of re-partnering after divorce or separation
Trends in stepfamilies have changed
In 2021, 8.8% of dependent children lived in stepfamilies, compared to 9.7% in 2011
85% of stepfamilies include at least one child from the mother’s previous relationship
11% have a child from the father’s previous relationship
4% include children from both partners’ previous relationships
Stepfamilies often face specific challenges, such as:
A higher risk of poverty due to financial responsibilities for children from multiple households
Divided loyalties, which can cause emotional tension and adjustment issues
Reasons for changes in stepfamilies
Link to divorce and lone-parent families
Stepfamilies typically form when lone parents enter new relationships
Therefore, factors leading to a rise in divorce, separation, and lone parenthood—such as reduced stigma and increased cohabitation—also contribute to the growth of stepfamilies
Children likely to remain with mother
Following separation or divorce, children are far more likely to live with their mothers
This explains why the majority of stepfamilies involve children from the mother’s previous relationship
Risk of poverty
Financial strain is common, as stepfathers or stepmothers may need to support both their biological children and stepchildren
The costs of maintaining multiple households further increase economic pressure
Tensions within stepfamilies
A lack of clear social norms about roles and responsibilities in stepfamilies can create conflict
Issues of loyalty may arise, particularly when children maintain strong attachments to their non-resident biological parent
Sociological perspectives
Functionalist perspective
Functionalists argue that stepfamilies, like nuclear families, fulfil essential roles such as socialisation and emotional support
However, they may face greater challenges adapting to complex family dynamics
New Right perspective
New Right theorists are often critical of stepfamilies, linking them to family breakdown
They claim they are less stable than nuclear families due to divided roles and responsibilities
Feminist perspective
Feminists highlight that stepfamilies can place an additional domestic and emotional burden on women, as they are often expected to care for both biological and stepchildren
They also argue that stepfamilies challenge traditional patriarchal family structures by creating more diverse and negotiated roles
Personal life perspective
From this perspective, what matters most is the quality of relationships rather than biological ties
Stepfamilies can provide strong bonds and support networks when relationships are based on emotional connection and cooperation
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?