The Future of Childhood (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
The disappearance of childhood
Sociologists continue to debate whether childhood is disappearing, evolving, or simply being experienced differently in contemporary society
Postman's view of childhood
Postman (1994) takes a structural approach, viewing childhood as a shared experience for all in Western society
He argues that childhood is disappearing due to the influence of television and digital media
He claims that the boundary between childhood and adulthood is becoming increasingly blurred
This is due to the breakdown of the information hierarchy:
In the past, adults controlled access to knowledge through the printed word
Children were excluded from this information because they couldn’t read
Now, television and the internet allow children easy access to adult content (e.g., sex, violence, death) without any special skills
As a result, adult and child distinctions in speech, clothing, and behaviour are fading
Postman calls for stricter censorship of television, gaming, and online media to protect children from inappropriate exposure
Postmodernist view of childhood
Jenks (2005) disagrees with Postman as he argues childhood is not disappearing, but it is changing
In today’s postmodern society, relationships are increasingly unstable (e.g., rising divorce rates, job insecurity)
As a result, adults perceive children as vulnerable and in need of protection
In this context, children become a source of security and identity for adults
Therefore, childhood becomes even more protected and central to family life, not eroded
Evaluation of Postman's view
Strengths
Research support:
Surveys from the BBC (2011) and Cambridge University (2007) indicate children are increasingly anxious about adult concerns, such as terrorism or crime
Health concerns:
The UK ranks highly in international studies on obesity, self-harm, depression, and teenage pregnancy
This suggests childhood may be under strain
Criticisms
Childhood still exists:
Opie (1993) found that children continue to enjoy a distinct culture (e.g., games, songs, and rhymes), suggesting childhood is far from disappearing
Overemphasis on one factor:
Postman has been criticised for focusing solely on media
Other factors also affect childhood, such as:
Parental neglect and poor-quality interaction contribute to a "toxic childhood" (Palmer, 2007)
Liberal parenting and children’s rights make parents less authoritative and involved in their children’s upbringing (Phillips, 1997)
The march of progress view
Some sociologists argue that the position of children in Western societies has significantly improved
This "march of progress" view claims that childhood today is the best it’s ever been
Sociologists like Aries and Shorter support this perspective, highlighting how society has become more child-centred:
Laws now protect children from harm and exploitation
Infant mortality rates have fallen, and family sizes are smaller
Children receive more attention, rights, and care than in the past
Parents invest emotionally and financially in fewer children
Children are nurtured, protected, and valued
They are the focal point of family life and take part in decision-making
Much media, toys, and leisure are tailored specifically for children
Evaluation
Palmer (2007, 2010) criticises the march of progress view, arguing that children are suffering from a “toxic childhood”
Rapid technological and cultural changes are harming children's development:
Rise of junk food culture
Long hours spent gaming
Aggressive marketing aimed at children
Parental absence due to long work hours
Overemphasis on testing in schools
A UNICEF (2025) report (opens in a new tab) ranked the UK 21st out of 36 for children's wellbeing – showing that modern childhood isn’t positive for all
The conflict view
The conflict perspective challenges the march of progress view, arguing that childhood is not a universally positive experience
Instead, it is shaped by inequalities linked to class, gender, and ethnicity
Conflict sociologists (e.g., Marxists and feminists) argue that the idea of a happy, child-centred society is idealised and misleading
It ignores the structural inequalities many children face, both among themselves and in their relationships with adults
Inequalities among children
Gender
Hillman (1993) argues that boys are granted more freedom, e.g. using public transport or going out after dark
Bonke (1999) found girls perform more domestic labour, especially in lone-parent families, where they do five times more housework than boys
McRobbie & Garber (1976) found that boys are encouraged to go out, while girls are socialised into staying indoors – a process referred to as 'bedroom culture'
Ethnicity
Brannen (1994) found that Asian parents are generally stricter, especially towards daughters
Bhatti (1999) argues that concepts like 'izzat' (family honour) can place additional restrictions on girls' behaviour in Asian families
Class and poverty
Children from working-class or materially deprived families are more likely to:
have poorer diets and weaker immune systems
experience long-term illness or die in infancy
perform worse in education and have limited life chances compared to middle-class peers
Inequalities between adults and children
Firestone (1979) argues that what march of progress writers view as “protection” is often actually a form of control
E.g., preventing children from working makes them economically dependent and more powerless
Neglect and abuse
The NSPCC (opens in a new tab) (2024) states that one child a week is killed by a parent or carer
Cooper (1971) argues that the family can emotionally 'terrorise' children by teaching blind obedience to authority
Age patriarchy
Gittens (1998) uses the term 'age patriarchy' to describe adult domination over children
Children's lives are controlled through:
space
Restricted movement (e.g., can’t walk to school alone, constant supervision in public)
time
Daily routines are set by adults (e.g. when to wake, eat, do homework, watch TV, and go to bed)
bodies
Adults decide how children dress and behave, and even small acts like whether they can suck their thumb or pierce their ears
resources
Children remain financially dependent on adults
Parents control pocket money and set rules on what it can be spent on
An action approach to childhood
The action approach challenges both the march of progress view and structural theories of childhood by focusing on the individual experiences of children
This perspective, also known as the personal life approach, argues that childhood is not a single, uniform experience
Every child’s experience is unique and influenced by their own choices, relationships, and contexts
Mayall (2004) criticises traditional views that treat children as simply "adults in the making"
She argues that sociologists should study childhood in its own right, not just as preparation for adulthood
Children as active agents
Children are not just passive recipients of adult socialisation — they are active participants in shaping their own lives
They often play a central role in family dynamics, with their needs and routines shaping adult behaviour
Mason and Tipper (2008) found that children decide who they see as “family”, even if people aren't biologically related
E.g., they may include step-parents, friends, or even pets in their definition of family
Individual childhoods
The personal life perspective emphasises that every child is different — their social class, culture, family structure and personality all shape how they experience childhood
Womack (2011) criticises government policies that assume more money = a better childhood
Research suggests that what matters to children — like feeling listened to or having meaningful relationships — isn’t always linked to material wealth
Evaluation
The action approach is supported by interactionist theorists, who also argue that children can be influential within the family
For example, children often teach their parents about social norms, trends, and technology
This perspective sees socialisation as a two-way process, where both adults and children learn from one another through daily interactions
However, the desire for independence as children grow older can lead to conflicts with parents — especially around issues like freedom, friendships, and social media use
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Make sure you know the difference between structural and action theorists. Structural theorists like Postman and Palmer argue childhood is shaped by wider social forces, so it’s the same for all children in the West.
In contrast, action theorists (e.g., Mayall, Mason and Tipper) criticise this view as too general. They believe children are active agents who experience childhood differently, depending on their family, culture, gender and relationships.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?