The Future of Childhood (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
The disappearance of childhood
- Sociologists continue to debate whether childhood is disappearing, evolving, or simply being experienced differently in contemporary society 
Postman's view of childhood
- Postman (1994) takes a structural approach, viewing childhood as a shared experience for all in Western society 
- He argues that childhood is disappearing due to the influence of television and digital media 
- He claims that the boundary between childhood and adulthood is becoming increasingly blurred 
- This is due to the breakdown of the information hierarchy: - In the past, adults controlled access to knowledge through the printed word 
- Children were excluded from this information because they couldn’t read 
 
- Now, television and the internet allow children easy access to adult content (e.g., sex, violence, death) without any special skills 
- As a result, adult and child distinctions in speech, clothing, and behaviour are fading 
- Postman calls for stricter censorship of television, gaming, and online media to protect children from inappropriate exposure 
Postmodernist view of childhood
- Jenks (2005) disagrees with Postman as he argues childhood is not disappearing, but it is changing 
- In today’s postmodern society, relationships are increasingly unstable (e.g., rising divorce rates, job insecurity) 
- As a result, adults perceive children as vulnerable and in need of protection 
- In this context, children become a source of security and identity for adults 
- Therefore, childhood becomes even more protected and central to family life, not eroded 
Evaluation of Postman's view
Strengths
- Research support: - Surveys from the BBC (2011) and Cambridge University (2007) indicate children are increasingly anxious about adult concerns, such as terrorism or crime 
 - Health concerns: - The UK ranks highly in international studies on obesity, self-harm, depression, and teenage pregnancy - This suggests childhood may be under strain 
 
 
Criticisms
- Childhood still exists: - Opie (1993) found that children continue to enjoy a distinct culture (e.g., games, songs, and rhymes), suggesting childhood is far from disappearing 
 
- Overemphasis on one factor: - Postman has been criticised for focusing solely on media 
- Other factors also affect childhood, such as: - Parental neglect and poor-quality interaction contribute to a "toxic childhood" (Palmer, 2007) 
- Liberal parenting and children’s rights make parents less authoritative and involved in their children’s upbringing (Phillips, 1997) 
 
 
The march of progress view
- Some sociologists argue that the position of children in Western societies has significantly improved 
- This "march of progress" view claims that childhood today is the best it’s ever been 
- Sociologists like Aries and Shorter support this perspective, highlighting how society has become more child-centred: - Laws now protect children from harm and exploitation 
- Infant mortality rates have fallen, and family sizes are smaller 
- Children receive more attention, rights, and care than in the past 
- Parents invest emotionally and financially in fewer children 
- Children are nurtured, protected, and valued 
- They are the focal point of family life and take part in decision-making 
- Much media, toys, and leisure are tailored specifically for children 
 
Evaluation
- Palmer (2007, 2010) criticises the march of progress view, arguing that children are suffering from a “toxic childhood” 
- Rapid technological and cultural changes are harming children's development: - Rise of junk food culture 
- Long hours spent gaming 
- Aggressive marketing aimed at children 
- Parental absence due to long work hours 
- Overemphasis on testing in schools 
 
- A UNICEF (2025) report (opens in a new tab) ranked the UK 21st out of 36 for children's wellbeing – showing that modern childhood isn’t positive for all 
The conflict view
- The conflict perspective challenges the march of progress view, arguing that childhood is not a universally positive experience 
- Instead, it is shaped by inequalities linked to class, gender, and ethnicity - Conflict sociologists (e.g., Marxists and feminists) argue that the idea of a happy, child-centred society is idealised and misleading 
- It ignores the structural inequalities many children face, both among themselves and in their relationships with adults 
 
Inequalities among children
Gender
- Hillman (1993) argues that boys are granted more freedom, e.g. using public transport or going out after dark 
- Bonke (1999) found girls perform more domestic labour, especially in lone-parent families, where they do five times more housework than boys 
- McRobbie & Garber (1976) found that boys are encouraged to go out, while girls are socialised into staying indoors – a process referred to as 'bedroom culture' 
Ethnicity
- Brannen (1994) found that Asian parents are generally stricter, especially towards daughters 
- Bhatti (1999) argues that concepts like 'izzat' (family honour) can place additional restrictions on girls' behaviour in Asian families 
Class and poverty
- Children from working-class or materially deprived families are more likely to: - have poorer diets and weaker immune systems 
- experience long-term illness or die in infancy 
- perform worse in education and have limited life chances compared to middle-class peers 
 
Inequalities between adults and children
- Firestone (1979) argues that what march of progress writers view as “protection” is often actually a form of control - E.g., preventing children from working makes them economically dependent and more powerless 
 
Neglect and abuse
- The NSPCC (opens in a new tab) (2025) states that one child a week is killed by a parent or carer 
- Cooper (1971) argues that the family can emotionally 'terrorise' children by teaching blind obedience to authority 
Age patriarchy
- Gittens (1998) uses the term 'age patriarchy' to describe adult domination over children 
- Children's lives are controlled through: - space - Restricted movement (e.g., can’t walk to school alone, constant supervision in public) 
 
- time - Daily routines are set by adults (e.g. when to wake, eat, do homework, watch TV, and go to bed) 
 
- bodies - Adults decide how children dress and behave, and even small acts like whether they can suck their thumb or pierce their ears 
 
- resources - Children remain financially dependent on adults 
- Parents control pocket money and set rules on what it can be spent on 
 
 
An action approach to childhood
- The action approach challenges both the march of progress view and structural theories of childhood by focusing on the individual experiences of children - This perspective, also known as the personal life approach, argues that childhood is not a single, uniform experience 
- Every child’s experience is unique and influenced by their own choices, relationships, and contexts 
 
- Mayall (2004) criticises traditional views that treat children as simply "adults in the making" - She argues that sociologists should study childhood in its own right, not just as preparation for adulthood 
 
Children as active agents
- Children are not just passive recipients of adult socialisation — they are active participants in shaping their own lives 
- They often play a central role in family dynamics, with their needs and routines shaping adult behaviour 
- Mason and Tipper (2008) found that children decide who they see as “family”, even if people aren't biologically related - E.g., they may include step-parents, friends, or even pets in their definition of family 
 
Individual childhoods
- The personal life perspective emphasises that every child is different — their social class, culture, family structure and personality all shape how they experience childhood 
- Womack (2011) criticises government policies that assume more money = a better childhood 
- Research suggests that what matters to children — like feeling listened to or having meaningful relationships — isn’t always linked to material wealth 
Evaluation
- The action approach is supported by interactionist theorists, who also argue that children can be influential within the family - For example, children often teach their parents about social norms, trends, and technology 
 
- This perspective sees socialisation as a two-way process, where both adults and children learn from one another through daily interactions 
- However, the desire for independence as children grow older can lead to conflicts with parents — especially around issues like freedom, friendships, and social media use 
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Make sure you know the difference between structural and action theorists. Structural theorists like Postman and Palmer argue childhood is shaped by wider social forces, so it’s the same for all children in the West.
In contrast, action theorists (e.g., Mayall, Mason and Tipper) criticise this view as too general. They believe children are active agents who experience childhood differently, depending on their family, culture, gender and relationships.
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?

