The Personal Life Perspective of the Family (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note

Exam code: 7192

Raj Bonsor

Last updated

Critique of structural theories of the family

  • The personal life perspective challenges traditional structural approaches such as functionalism, Marxism, and feminism, which often adopt a top-down and overly generalised view of family life

  • Instead, this perspective emphasises the subjective meanings individuals attach to relationships, focusing on how people personally define what ‘family’ means to them

Limitations of structural theories

  • Assumption of the nuclear family as the norm

    • Structural perspectives often present the nuclear family as the most ‘ideal’ or functional family form

    • This ignores the diversity of modern family arrangements, such as lone-parent households, stepfamilies, same-sex families, and chosen families

  • Overly deterministic

    • Functionalist, Marxist, and feminist theories portray individuals as passively shaped by wider social structures, such as capitalism or patriarchy

    • They overlook how individuals actively negotiate and shape their own family experiences

  • Neglect of personal meanings

    • Traditional theories focus on the roles and functions families perform (e.g., socialisation, economic support)

    • They fail to consider how people interpret their relationships and the emotional significance they attach to them

The importance of 'personal life'

  • Smart (2007) suggests replacing the term ‘family’ with ‘personal life’, as 'family' often carries assumptions about what is ‘ideal’ or ‘normal

  • The concept of personal life is neutral, flexible, and inclusive, extending beyond marriage and biological kinship to encompass a variety of meaningful relationships

Reframing what counts as family

  • The personal life perspective adopts a bottom-up approach, focusing on the meanings, experiences, and emotions individuals attach to their relationships by

    • focusing on experience and emotion:

      • Family can be defined by closeness, care, and emotional bonds, not just by legal or biological ties

    • being inclusive of diverse relationships:

      • Recognises a wide range of intimate connections as family, including stepfamilies, cohabiting partners, and close friends

Families beyond blood or law

  • Chosen families

    • People often create meaningful bonds outside traditional definitions, e.g.,

      • Friends who feel like siblings

      • Fictive kin (e.g., calling a parent’s friend 'auntie')

      • Pets treated as family members (Tipper, 2011)

  • Child perspectives

    • Mason and Tipper (2008) found children define family by who cares for and supports them, rather than genetics

  • Donor-conceived families

    • Nordqvist and Smart (2014) observed that emotional investment is valued over biological links

      • A non-genetic mother can be seen as the ‘real’ mum if she actively nurtures and loves the child

Evaluation of the personal life perspective

Strengths

  • Reflects modern family diversity

    • Provides a realistic, flexible view of family life in a varied and changing society

    • Allan and Crow (2001) note that life paths are now less linear, with individuals experiencing multiple relationship stages

  • Focus on emotion and belonging

    • Highlights how close relationships shape identity, security, and a sense of belonging

    • Argues that social and emotional bonds can be as important—or more so—than biological ones

  • Not naively positive

    • Recognises that close relationships can also be harmful, e.g., in abusive households

Criticisms

  • Too inclusive

    • Defining family too broadly risks losing its distinct meaning and overlooks the uniqueness of biological or legal relationships

  • Overlooks power structures

    • Fails to fully address how patriarchy, capitalism, or racism shape family choices and experiences

  • Overlooks cultural differences

    • May (2013) argues that late modernists like Giddens and Beck (opens in a new tab) focus too much on white, middle-class couples

    • Many families face economic or cultural constraints, meaning individual choice is not as free as suggested

Examiner Tips and Tricks

The sociology of personal life is a newer approach influenced by interactionist and postmodernist thinking. It is a useful way to evaluate and critique the more rigid, traditional views of the family offered by structural perspectives.

You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.