The Personal Life Perspective of the Family (AQA A Level Sociology): Revision Note
Exam code: 7192
Critique of structural theories of the family
The personal life perspective challenges traditional structural approaches such as functionalism, Marxism, and feminism, which often adopt a top-down and overly generalised view of family life
Instead, this perspective emphasises the subjective meanings individuals attach to relationships, focusing on how people personally define what ‘family’ means to them
Limitations of structural theories
Assumption of the nuclear family as the norm
Structural perspectives often present the nuclear family as the most ‘ideal’ or functional family form
This ignores the diversity of modern family arrangements, such as lone-parent households, stepfamilies, same-sex families, and chosen families
Overly deterministic
Functionalist, Marxist, and feminist theories portray individuals as passively shaped by wider social structures, such as capitalism or patriarchy
They overlook how individuals actively negotiate and shape their own family experiences
Neglect of personal meanings
Traditional theories focus on the roles and functions families perform (e.g., socialisation, economic support)
They fail to consider how people interpret their relationships and the emotional significance they attach to them
The importance of 'personal life'
Smart (2007) suggests replacing the term ‘family’ with ‘personal life’, as 'family' often carries assumptions about what is ‘ideal’ or ‘normal’
The concept of personal life is neutral, flexible, and inclusive, extending beyond marriage and biological kinship to encompass a variety of meaningful relationships
Reframing what counts as family
The personal life perspective adopts a bottom-up approach, focusing on the meanings, experiences, and emotions individuals attach to their relationships by
focusing on experience and emotion:
Family can be defined by closeness, care, and emotional bonds, not just by legal or biological ties
being inclusive of diverse relationships:
Recognises a wide range of intimate connections as family, including stepfamilies, cohabiting partners, and close friends
Families beyond blood or law
Chosen families
People often create meaningful bonds outside traditional definitions, e.g.,
Friends who feel like siblings
Fictive kin (e.g., calling a parent’s friend 'auntie')
Pets treated as family members (Tipper, 2011)
Child perspectives
Mason and Tipper (2008) found children define family by who cares for and supports them, rather than genetics
Donor-conceived families
Nordqvist and Smart (2014) observed that emotional investment is valued over biological links
A non-genetic mother can be seen as the ‘real’ mum if she actively nurtures and loves the child
Evaluation of the personal life perspective
Strengths
Reflects modern family diversity
Provides a realistic, flexible view of family life in a varied and changing society
Allan and Crow (2001) note that life paths are now less linear, with individuals experiencing multiple relationship stages
Focus on emotion and belonging
Highlights how close relationships shape identity, security, and a sense of belonging
Argues that social and emotional bonds can be as important—or more so—than biological ones
Not naively positive
Recognises that close relationships can also be harmful, e.g., in abusive households
Criticisms
Too inclusive
Defining family too broadly risks losing its distinct meaning and overlooks the uniqueness of biological or legal relationships
Overlooks power structures
Fails to fully address how patriarchy, capitalism, or racism shape family choices and experiences
Overlooks cultural differences
May (2013) argues that late modernists like Giddens and Beck (opens in a new tab) focus too much on white, middle-class couples
Many families face economic or cultural constraints, meaning individual choice is not as free as suggested
Examiner Tips and Tricks
The sociology of personal life is a newer approach influenced by interactionist and postmodernist thinking. It is a useful way to evaluate and critique the more rigid, traditional views of the family offered by structural perspectives.
You've read 0 of your 5 free revision notes this week
Unlock more, it's free!
Did this page help you?