Parenting & Attachment (College Board AP® Psychology): Revision Note
Parenting styles
Research has identified distinct parenting styles
These are consistent patterns of parenting behaviors that reflect different approaches to discipline, warmth, and expectations
Three main parenting styles have been identified:
Style | Characteristics | Typical outcomes for children |
|---|---|---|
Authoritative | High expectations combined with warmth, explanation, and responsiveness. Rules are explained and consistently enforced | Children tend to be socially capable, self-reliant, and academically successful. Most consistently associated with positive outcomes |
Authoritarian | High expectations with low warmth. Strict rules without explanation and a reliance on punishment for disobedience | Children tend to be obedient but may have lower self-esteem, be more dependent, and be less socially skilled |
Permissive | High warmth with low expectations and few rules. Parents are nurturing but make few demands | Children tend to have poor impulse control and self-regulation. They may struggle with independence and authority |
Cultural differences exist in how parenting styles affect outcomes
Authoritarian parenting is associated with poorer outcomes in some Western samples
Authoritarian parenting produces different outcomes in some East Asian and African American families, where it may be associated with high academic achievement
This demonstrates that parenting style cannot be evaluated independently of cultural context
Attachment theory
Attachment is the strong emotional bond that forms between an infant and their primary caregiver
Attachment serves as the foundation for social and emotional development across the lifespan
John Bowlby proposed that attachment is innate and evolved as a survival mechanism:
Infants are born with social releasers
These are innate behaviors that trigger caregiving responses in adults and facilitate bond formation, e.g. smiling, cooing, gripping
Bowlby proposed a critical period for attachment formation
This is approximately 3 to 6 months, but Bowlby later broadened this to a sensitive period within the first 36 months
Bowlby's theory is described as monotropic
He argued that infants form one primary attachment figure before any others, and that the quality of this bond shapes all later relationships
Bowlby proposed that early attachment creates an internal working model
This is a mental representation (schema) of what relationships look like, built from the infant's experience with their primary caregiver
The internal working model impacts relationships in the following ways:
A child who experiences a secure, consistent, and loving relationship will develop an internal working model that leads them to expect positive relationships in the future
A child who experiences an inconsistent or negative relationship will develop a working model that leads them to expect negative treatment or to treat others poorly
The internal working model explains why childhood attachment patterns can affect how adults form relationships
Harlow's monkey studies
The importance of contact comfort over feeding in attachment was demonstrated by Harry Harlow's (1958) studies with rhesus monkeys
Harlow created two wire "surrogate mothers":
One was made of bare wire but dispensed milk
One was covered in soft cloth but dispensed no milk
Eight infant monkeys were exposed to both surrogates over 165 days:
All eight spent the majority of their time clinging to the cloth mother regardless of which dispensed milk
Monkeys fed by the wire mother only visited it briefly to feed before returning to the cloth mother
When frightened, all monkeys ran to and clung to the cloth mother
When exploring novel objects, monkeys kept at least one limb in contact with the cloth mother, using it as a secure base
Harlow concluded that attachment is formed through contact comfort rather than through feeding
This directly contradicting the learning theory view that attachment forms because the caregiver is associated with food
Long-term follow-up showed that monkeys raised with only wire or cloth surrogates, without normal social contact, developed severe behavioral abnormalities in adulthood, such as:
increased aggression
poor social skills
difficulty mating
neglect or abuse of their own offspring
Monkeys who had some peer contact before 3 months showed partial recovery
Those isolated for more than 6 months did not recover normal behavior
This suggests a critical period for social development
Attachment styles: Ainsworth's Strange Situation
Mary Ainsworth devised the Strange Situation
This is a controlled observational procedure designed to assess the quality of attachment between an infant and their caregiver
The procedure involved eight 3-minute episodes in which the infant's behavior was observed during:
exploration with the caregiver present (secure base behavior)
the arrival of a stranger (stranger anxiety)
separation from the caregiver (separation anxiety)
reunion with the caregiver (reunion behavior)
Ainsworth identified three attachment styles from her findings
A fourth was later identified by Main & Solomon (1986)
Attachment style | Behavior during separation | Behavior at reunion | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|
Secure | Moderate distress - upset but able to be comforted | Seeks and accepts comfort from caregiver. Settles quickly | Uses caregiver as a secure base. Trusts caregiver's return |
Insecure-avoidant | Little or no distress. Continues playing | Ignores or avoids caregiver on return | Does not use caregiver as a secure base. Appears indifferent |
Insecure-anxious (resistant) | High distress. Very difficult to settle | Seeks comfort but simultaneously resists it. Cannot be settled | Clingy and ambivalent. Uncertain whether caregiver will return |
Disorganized | Confused, contradictory, or fearful responses | No consistent strategy. May freeze, rock, or show fear toward caregiver | Associated with frightening or unpredictable caregiving |
Cross-cultural research shows that attachment styles vary across cultures
Secure attachment is the most common type globally, but the distribution of insecure styles differs across cultures
Insecure-avoidant attachment is more common in Northern European samples
Insecure-anxious attachment is more common in some East Asian and Israeli samples
These differences in attachment type reflect cultural differences in caregiving norms
Evaluating Ainsworth's Strange Situation
Strengths
The procedure is highly standardized
All infants go through the same eight episodes in the same order, making it replicable and results comparable across studies
It has good inter-rater reliability
Observers agreed on attachment classifications in 94% of cases, suggesting the attachment types are not subjective
The findings of Ainsworth's observations show good predictive validity
Securely attached infants tend to have better outcomes in later relationships, mental health, and academic achievement
Limitations
The observation lacks ecological validity
The setting is artificial and the episodes are unlikely to occur in everyday life, meaning some infants may be wrongly classified
Ainsworth used a culturally limited sample
The findings may not generalize beyond white, middle-class Western infants
E.g., a Japanese study found a high proportion of insecure-anxious classifications, likely reflecting cultural caregiving norms rather than genuine insecurity
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Ensure that you understand these key points:
Harlow's findings do not show that feeding is unimportant in attachment
Harlow's findings show that contact comfort is more important than feeding in forming attachment, as feeding alone is insufficient to create a bond
Nutrition remains important for survival; it just does not drive attachment
Secure attachment is not the only healthy attachment style
While secure attachment is associated with the best outcomes, insecure attachment styles are adaptive responses to specific caregiving environments
They represent strategies for managing an unpredictable caregiver rather than a failure of development
Attachment style is not fixed in infancy and can change
Attachment security can change in response to significant life experiences, such as new relationships, therapy, or changes in caregiving quality can shift attachment patterns
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For Skill 1.A, attachment questions may describe an infant's behavior during separation and reunion and ask you to identify the attachment style
Ensure that you know the key distinguishing behaviors for each attachment style
The CED explicitly names Harlow's monkey studies as demonstrating the importance of comfort over food in attachment
Be prepared to describe the procedure and findings and explain what they tell us about the basis of attachment (Skill 1.A)
For Skill 2.B, Harlow's studies raise significant ethical issues
The monkeys experienced lasting psychological harm. Be prepared to evaluate whether the ethical costs of Harlow's research were justified by the scientific gains
Cultural differences in parenting style outcomes and attachment distributions are explicitly required by the CED
Always consider cultural context when evaluating claims about parenting and attachment (Skill 1.A)
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?