Parenting & Attachment (College Board AP® Psychology): Revision Note

Raj Bonsor

Written by: Raj Bonsor

Reviewed by: Claire Neeson

Updated on

Parenting styles

  • Research has identified distinct parenting styles

    • These are consistent patterns of parenting behaviors that reflect different approaches to discipline, warmth, and expectations

  • Three main parenting styles have been identified:

Style

Characteristics

Typical outcomes for children

Authoritative

High expectations combined with warmth, explanation, and responsiveness. Rules are explained and consistently enforced

Children tend to be socially capable, self-reliant, and academically successful. Most consistently associated with positive outcomes

Authoritarian

High expectations with low warmth. Strict rules without explanation and a reliance on punishment for disobedience

Children tend to be obedient but may have lower self-esteem, be more dependent, and be less socially skilled

Permissive

High warmth with low expectations and few rules. Parents are nurturing but make few demands

Children tend to have poor impulse control and self-regulation. They may struggle with independence and authority

  • Cultural differences exist in how parenting styles affect outcomes

    • Authoritarian parenting is associated with poorer outcomes in some Western samples

    • Authoritarian parenting produces different outcomes in some East Asian and African American families, where it may be associated with high academic achievement

  • This demonstrates that parenting style cannot be evaluated independently of cultural context

Attachment theory

  • Attachment is the strong emotional bond that forms between an infant and their primary caregiver

    • Attachment serves as the foundation for social and emotional development across the lifespan

  • John Bowlby proposed that attachment is innate and evolved as a survival mechanism:

    • Infants are born with social releasers

      • These are innate behaviors that trigger caregiving responses in adults and facilitate bond formation, e.g. smiling, cooing, gripping

    • Bowlby proposed a critical period for attachment formation

      • This is approximately 3 to 6 months, but Bowlby later broadened this to a sensitive period within the first 36 months

    • Bowlby's theory is described as monotropic

      • He argued that infants form one primary attachment figure before any others, and that the quality of this bond shapes all later relationships

  • Bowlby proposed that early attachment creates an internal working model

    • This is a mental representation (schema) of what relationships look like, built from the infant's experience with their primary caregiver

  • The internal working model impacts relationships in the following ways:

    • A child who experiences a secure, consistent, and loving relationship will develop an internal working model that leads them to expect positive relationships in the future

    • A child who experiences an inconsistent or negative relationship will develop a working model that leads them to expect negative treatment or to treat others poorly

  • The internal working model explains why childhood attachment patterns can affect how adults form relationships

Harlow's monkey studies

  • The importance of contact comfort over feeding in attachment was demonstrated by Harry Harlow's (1958) studies with rhesus monkeys

  • Harlow created two wire "surrogate mothers":

    • One was made of bare wire but dispensed milk

    • One was covered in soft cloth but dispensed no milk

  • Eight infant monkeys were exposed to both surrogates over 165 days:

    • All eight spent the majority of their time clinging to the cloth mother regardless of which dispensed milk

    • Monkeys fed by the wire mother only visited it briefly to feed before returning to the cloth mother

    • When frightened, all monkeys ran to and clung to the cloth mother

    • When exploring novel objects, monkeys kept at least one limb in contact with the cloth mother, using it as a secure base

  • Harlow concluded that attachment is formed through contact comfort rather than through feeding

    • This directly contradicting the learning theory view that attachment forms because the caregiver is associated with food

  • Long-term follow-up showed that monkeys raised with only wire or cloth surrogates, without normal social contact, developed severe behavioral abnormalities in adulthood, such as:

    • increased aggression

    • poor social skills

    • difficulty mating

    • neglect or abuse of their own offspring

  • Monkeys who had some peer contact before 3 months showed partial recovery

  • Those isolated for more than 6 months did not recover normal behavior

    • This suggests a critical period for social development

Attachment styles: Ainsworth's Strange Situation

  • Mary Ainsworth devised the Strange Situation

    • This is a controlled observational procedure designed to assess the quality of attachment between an infant and their caregiver

  • The procedure involved eight 3-minute episodes in which the infant's behavior was observed during:

    • exploration with the caregiver present (secure base behavior)

    • the arrival of a stranger (stranger anxiety)

    • separation from the caregiver (separation anxiety)

    • reunion with the caregiver (reunion behavior)

  • Ainsworth identified three attachment styles from her findings

    • A fourth was later identified by Main & Solomon (1986)

Attachment style

Behavior during separation

Behavior at reunion

Key features

Secure

Moderate distress - upset but able to be comforted

Seeks and accepts comfort from caregiver. Settles quickly

Uses caregiver as a secure base. Trusts caregiver's return

Insecure-avoidant

Little or no distress. Continues playing

Ignores or avoids caregiver on return

Does not use caregiver as a secure base. Appears indifferent

Insecure-anxious (resistant)

High distress. Very difficult to settle

Seeks comfort but simultaneously resists it. Cannot be settled

Clingy and ambivalent. Uncertain whether caregiver will return

Disorganized

Confused, contradictory, or fearful responses

No consistent strategy. May freeze, rock, or show fear toward caregiver

Associated with frightening or unpredictable caregiving

  • Cross-cultural research shows that attachment styles vary across cultures

    • Secure attachment is the most common type globally, but the distribution of insecure styles differs across cultures

      • Insecure-avoidant attachment is more common in Northern European samples

      • Insecure-anxious attachment is more common in some East Asian and Israeli samples

    • These differences in attachment type reflect cultural differences in caregiving norms

Evaluating Ainsworth's Strange Situation

Strengths

  • The procedure is highly standardized

    • All infants go through the same eight episodes in the same order, making it replicable and results comparable across studies

  • It has good inter-rater reliability

    • Observers agreed on attachment classifications in 94% of cases, suggesting the attachment types are not subjective

  • The findings of Ainsworth's observations show good predictive validity

    • Securely attached infants tend to have better outcomes in later relationships, mental health, and academic achievement

Limitations

  • The observation lacks ecological validity

    • The setting is artificial and the episodes are unlikely to occur in everyday life, meaning some infants may be wrongly classified

  • Ainsworth used a culturally limited sample

    • The findings may not generalize beyond white, middle-class Western infants

    • E.g., a Japanese study found a high proportion of insecure-anxious classifications, likely reflecting cultural caregiving norms rather than genuine insecurity

Examiner Tips and Tricks

Ensure that you understand these key points:

  • Harlow's findings do not show that feeding is unimportant in attachment

    • Harlow's findings show that contact comfort is more important than feeding in forming attachment, as feeding alone is insufficient to create a bond

    • Nutrition remains important for survival; it just does not drive attachment

  • Secure attachment is not the only healthy attachment style

    • While secure attachment is associated with the best outcomes, insecure attachment styles are adaptive responses to specific caregiving environments

    • They represent strategies for managing an unpredictable caregiver rather than a failure of development

  • Attachment style is not fixed in infancy and can change

    • Attachment security can change in response to significant life experiences, such as new relationships, therapy, or changes in caregiving quality can shift attachment patterns

Examiner Tips and Tricks

  • For Skill 1.A, attachment questions may describe an infant's behavior during separation and reunion and ask you to identify the attachment style

    • Ensure that you know the key distinguishing behaviors for each attachment style

  • The CED explicitly names Harlow's monkey studies as demonstrating the importance of comfort over food in attachment

    • Be prepared to describe the procedure and findings and explain what they tell us about the basis of attachment (Skill 1.A)

  • For Skill 2.B, Harlow's studies raise significant ethical issues

    • The monkeys experienced lasting psychological harm. Be prepared to evaluate whether the ethical costs of Harlow's research were justified by the scientific gains

  • Cultural differences in parenting style outcomes and attachment distributions are explicitly required by the CED

    • Always consider cultural context when evaluating claims about parenting and attachment (Skill 1.A)

Unlock more, it's free!

Join the 100,000+ Students that ❤️ Save My Exams

the (exam) results speak for themselves:

Raj Bonsor

Author: Raj Bonsor

Expertise: Psychology & Sociology Content Creator

Raj joined Save My Exams in 2024 as a Senior Content Creator for Psychology & Sociology. Prior to this, she spent fifteen years in the classroom, teaching hundreds of GCSE and A Level students. She has experience as Subject Leader for Psychology and Sociology, and her favourite topics to teach are research methods (especially inferential statistics!) and attachment. She has also successfully taught a number of Level 3 subjects, including criminology, health & social care, and citizenship.

Claire Neeson

Reviewer: Claire Neeson

Expertise: Psychology Content Creator

Claire has been teaching for 34 years, in the UK and overseas. She has taught GCSE, A-level and IB Psychology which has been a lot of fun and extremely exhausting! Claire is now a freelance Psychology teacher and content creator, producing textbooks, revision notes and (hopefully) exciting and interactive teaching materials for use in the classroom and for exam prep. Her passion (apart from Psychology of course) is roller skating and when she is not working (or watching 'Coronation Street') she can be found busting some impressive moves on her local roller rink.