Theories of Psychological Disorders (College Board AP® Psychology): Revision Note
Different perspectives on the causes of psychological disorders
The eclectic approach
Most psychologists employ an eclectic approach, drawing on more than one psychological perspective when diagnosing and treating clients
This reflects the complexity of psychological disorders, as no single perspective fully explains their causes
Clinicians select explanations and treatments based on the client's presentation, history, and needs, often combining approaches
E.g. a client's depression may be explained by biological (neurotransmitters), cognitive (negative thinking), and sociocultural (isolation) factors, and treated with both medication and therapy
The perspectives below represent different lenses through which the causes of psychological disorders can be examined
Each highlight different contributing factors
The 7 perspectives on causes of disorder
Behavioral perspective
Psychological disorders result from maladaptive learned associations to stimuli
Disorders are learned through the same mechanisms as normal behavior:
classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning
E.g. a phobia develops when a neutral stimulus is conditioned to produce a fear response
Treatment implication: behavior therapy seeks to unlearn maladaptive associations and replace them with adaptive ones
Psychodynamic perspective
Psychological disorders result from unconscious conflicts often developed during childhood:
Unresolved conflicts from early childhood are repressed into the unconscious and continue to drive behavior
Defense mechanisms use to manage these conflicts may contribute to dysfunction
E.g. depression may reflect repressed anger turned inward
Treatment implication: psychodynamic therapy seeks to bring unconscious conflicts into awareness so they can be consciously processed and resolved
Humanistic perspective
Psychological disorders result from being unable to fulfill one's potential due to:
lack of unconditional positive regard due to conditions of worth being placed upon them
persistent incongruence between their real and ideal self
E.g. low self-esteem and depression may result from a lifetime of conditional positive regard and the internalization of conditions of worth
Treatment implication: humanistic therapy (e.g. person-centered therapy) provides unconditional positive regard and promotes movement toward self-actualization
Cognitive perspective
Psychological disorders result from maladaptive thought patterns leading to negative emotional states and maladaptive behaviors:
Cognitive distortions, such as catastrophizing, overgeneralization, or all-or-nothing thinking, generate and maintain psychological disorders
E.g. a person with depression may engage in negative automatic thinking
Treatment implication: cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) identifies and challenges maladaptive thought patterns to change emotional and behavioral responses
Evolutionary perspective
Psychological disorders result from maladaptive expressions of once-adaptive traits
Behaviors that were useful in ancestral environments may be dysfunctional today
E.g. anxiety responses that were adaptive for detecting predators may be triggered maladaptively by modern social or environmental stressors;
The evolutionary perspective helps explain why certain disorders are universal across cultures, as they may reflect shared human evolutionary history
Sociocultural perspective
Psychological disorders result from maladaptive social and cultural relationships and dynamics:
Racism, sexism, ageism, poverty, discrimination, and social inequality all produce and maintain psychological disorders
Lack of social support and social isolation are significant contributors to mental health problems
E.g. higher rates of depression in marginalized groups may reflect the psychological burden of discrimination and social exclusion
Treatment implication: sociocultural approaches emphasize community-based approaches, social support systems, and addressing structural inequalities
Biological perspective
Psychological disorders result from physiological or genetic issues, such as:
neurotransmitter imbalances, hormonal regulation, or brain structure
E.g. schizophrenia is associated with dysregulation of dopamine systems and structural brain differences
Treatment implication: medication targeting the neurobiological causes of disorder, e.g. antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics
Summary table
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For Skill 4.B, you may be asked to make a defensible claim when comparing explanations of psychological disorder
A strong claim is that the biopsychosocial model provides a more complete explanation than any single perspective
Support this with evidence from multiple perspectives
Address the limitations of single-perspective explanations
Conclude that an eclectic or interactionist approach is best supported because psychological disorders usually have multiple contributing causes
Interaction models
No single perspective provides a complete account of psychological disorders
Instead, disorders are best understood as the result of interacting biological, psychological, and social factors
Interaction models emphasise that causes do not operate in isolation
Multiple influences combine to produce disorder.
Two key interaction models that illustrate this are:
the biopsychsocial model
the diathesis-stress model
The biopsychosocial model
The biopsychosocial model proposes that psychological disorders arise from the interaction of three levels:
Biological factors: genetic predispositions, neurochemical imbalances, brain structure, hormonal influences
Psychological factors: maladaptive thought patterns, unresolved emotional conflicts, learned associations, self-concept
Sociocultural factors: social support (or lack of), cultural norms, discrimination, poverty, relationships, community
These factors are interdependent:
biological vulnerabilities may be shaped by psychological and social experiences
social stress can lead to psychological and physiological changes
For example:
Depression is understood as involving:
a biological predisposition (e.g. reduced serotonin activity)
psychological factors (e.g. negative cognitive style, learned helplessness)
sociocultural factors (e.g. social isolation, adverse life events, cultural stigma around help-seeking)
The biopsychosocial model is widely seen as the most comprehensive, reflecting the eclectic approach that is used in clinical practice
The diathesis-stress model
The diathesis-stress model explains disorder as the interaction between vulnerability and stress
Diathesis: a genetic or biological predisposition that makes a person vulnerable to developing a disorder
Stress: environmental triggers (e.g. life events, adversity) that activate the diathesis
The disorder develops when stress exceeds the individual's threshold of vulnerability:
A person with high vulnerability may develop the disorder under relatively mild stress
A person with low vulnerability may only develop the disorder under severe or prolonged stress, or not develop it at all
The diathesis-stress model has strong support from twin studies:
identical twins show higher concordance rates for psychological disorders than fraternal twins
This demonstrates a genetic (diathesis) component
However, concordance rates are not 100% even for identical twins
This shows that genetic predisposition alone is insufficient, as environmental stress is also required
Comparing the two interaction models
Feature | Biopsychosocial Model | Diathesis-Stress Model |
|---|---|---|
Core idea | Disorders result from the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors | Disorders result from genetic vulnerability triggered by environmental stress |
Factors considered | Biological + psychological + sociocultural | Biological (diathesis) + environmental (stress) |
Emphasis | Broad integration of all three levels | Specific interaction between genetic risk and stress |
Both models show that psychological disorders are multifactorial, arising from the interaction of internal vulnerabilities and external experiences
Examiner Tips and Tricks
Ensure that you understand these key points:
A genetic predisposition does not guarantee a disorder
A diathesis only leads to disorder when combined with sufficient environmental stress
Many individuals have genetic vulnerability but never develop the disorder
The biopsychosocial and diathesis-stress models are not the same
The biopsychosocial model is broader, integrating biological, psychological, and sociocultural factors
The diathesis-stress model focuses specifically on the interaction between genetic vulnerability and environmental stress
The diathesis-stress model can be seen as a narrower explanation within the wider biopsychosocial framework
Examiner Tips and Tricks
For Skill 4.B, you may be asked to make a defensible claim about causes of disorder
A strong claim is that neither genetics nor environment alone can explain psychological disorders
Use twin studies as evidence:
identical twins share 100% of DNA but are not always concordant
this shows genetic vulnerability is necessary but not sufficient
environmental stress is also required
For Skill 2.D evaluate twin studies as raising ethical issues. Consider:
informed consent and whether participants understood the research
risk of stigma from how findings are reported
Unlock more, it's free!
Was this revision note helpful?